Reflection on Public Health Principles and Practice covering Module 1-4
Verified
Added on 2023/06/08
|3
|1423
|65
AI Summary
This reflection covers Module 1-4 of Public Health Principles and Practice. It includes topics such as new public health concepts in tuberculosis control, determinants of health inequities in cancer care, and reducing social exclusion among high school students. Credible references are provided for each topic.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Assessment 1PUBH6000Template Assessment 1 Reflection 1:Reflection on public health principles and practice Reflection 1: Covering Module 1- 4 Please reflect on your understanding of the topics covering module 1-4. You are required to writewithin 200 words per question. Please read the Assessment 1 briefbefore developing your assessment. You are required to support your ideas by providingat least 2 crediblereferences for each topic. TheAPA referencingsystem is required for in-text citation and reference list. Please compile all your references outside the table. Reflection of your understanding/perspective on the given topics below Module 1-2 Please provide two examples of how the new public health concepts have been used in the control of tuberculosis in your home country or any country of choice. Answer:- Tuberculosis is thirteenth leading cause of death and the second leading infection that increase the death rate after COVID-19. In 1993, TB is declared as global emergency by the World health Organisation. The person and complexness with active TB disease are determined by the health professionals. Person then got examined to find out whether they have active TB disease themselves or anyhow they have been contaminative with theM. tuberculosis, or they want window prophylaxis, If children or adults are at higher risk (Hamilton, Tolfree & Mytton (2018)). Person who are at high risk due to latent TB infection, screening, testing and treatment are done and subsequent TB diseasepersons who can most benefit from treatment for latent TB infection. The requirement for holding a broad level of disbelief for TB when analysing patients who have TB symptoms and also the value of early diagnosis, separation, and therapy initiation should underlined by the TB control program. Instruction to the facility staff giving care for TB patients about the need for routine periodic evaluation of infection control exercises should be performed by the TB control program and might also assist in the evaluation process(Ruth, Wachman & Marshall (2019)). facilitation can include giving modified suggestions and directions to the facility, giving names of specialist in infection control, or giving access to department participating in programmatic evaluations. Module 3 Health inequities and inequalities is a global problem. Identify and explain any two determinants that cause inequity in access to health care for cancer in any country. Answer:-Health inequities are biased,evitablevariation arising from poor administration, corruptness or cultural rejection. On the other hand, Inequality are referred to uneven dispersion of health and health resources between various populations groups, and developing from social condition in which people are born, grow up and work. Socio-economic constituent such as unemployment, insufficient education, neediness and income PUBH6000 Assessment 1 Reflection 1 (Module 1-4) template T2 22 Ver. 1.0ΙMay 2022Page1of3
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
inequality are most important social determinants for cancer. It is demonstrated that less- income persons are at excess risk of bundle of adverse health resultant and more likely to die prematurely. There are unmistakeable path through which social inequalities seem to lead to health inequalities(Weinhold & Gurtner (2018)). For example, In united states, most uneven distribution of income can be seen. Financing in public education and social safety is very low-level. There is a well constituted difference in cancer survival by socio-economic status, education, race, poverty and access to the health care. Poverty is concomitant to another factor like lack of health security, lack of primary care physician. In consideration of these social determinants, efficacious involvement are needed, in which cancer patients or survivor can live and treated. Social support and social networking is another key element. Existence of socialism have been shown to be a conserving factor for caring of good health and quality of life. Patient with sufficient social influence have more approach to health care, more participation in care, treatment options and a good relation with healthcare benefactor(Furceri & Ostry (2019)). In relation to Cancer patients, social separation with poorer quality of life is seen. Existence of social communication and high levels of interpersonal support provide a preventive factor for holding back good health and quality of life. Social support are connected with physical and mental wellness, good self-rated health, attenuated depression, and good quality of life, which are crucial sign of whole well-being Module 4 Social exclusion is one common issue among many populations. In your opinion, what could be two ways that public health professionals can do to reduce social exclusion among high school students in Australia or any country of your choice? Answer:- social exclusion is the cognition in which definite groups are consistently disfavours. on the basis of ethnicity, race, religion, sexual orientation, caste, descent, gender, age, disability, HIV status, migrant status or where they live they are discriminated.Those interpersonal leave outs are most likely to be poor, and this leads to trouble not only for themselves but for society also. Children who are exposed to social exclusion has to compromise with their mental, physical and emotional health(Retuerto & et.al. (2020)). For example, lower immunity, reduce calmness, reduced sleep, feeling of anxiety, lower self-esteem and depression, these all have been observed in excluded children. Health professional should reduce social exclusion among children by Be responsive to the students. Assurethem that they have the right to be safe and feel unafraid and that they will help them by talking with the school and providing a safe environment. For senior students, perceive to the activity that they would like to take and talk over with students when it would be suitable to talk with the school, for example, if they are still being excluded at the end of the week or if things intensify. School health professionals should consider over the origination of the non-acceptance experience,whether they are interpersonal or intergroup when reacting to social exclusion. Children often battle with both interpersonal and intergroup rejection and exclusion (Vranken (2019)).Health- care professionals should guarantee that their care involves awareness to effects related to psychological and behavioural health. This is especially important because exclusion can lead to mental health issues. PUBH6000 Assessment 1 Reflection 1 (Module 1-4) template T2 22 Ver. 1.0ΙMay 2022Page2of3
References (for all topics) Furceri, D., & Ostry, J. D. (2019). Robust determinants of income inequality. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 35(3), 490-517. Hamilton, K., Tolfree, R., & Mytton, J. (2018). A systematic review of active case-finding strategies for tuberculosis in homeless populations. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 22(10), 1135-1144. Retuerto, I & et.al. (2020). Scenarios from the margin: Narratives of adolescents and adults about their theatre experience in contexts of social exclusion in Santiago, Chile. Applied Theatre Research, 8(2), 197-212. Ruth, B., Wachman, M. K., & Marshall, J. (2019). Public health social work. Handbook of health social work, 93-118. Vranken, J. (2019). Unravelling the social strands of poverty: Differentiation, fragmentation, inequality, and exclusion. In Governing European Cities (pp. 71-91). Routledge. Weinhold, I., & Gurtner, S. (2018). Rural-urban differences in determinants of patient satisfaction with primary care. Social science & medicine, 212, 76-85. PUBH6000 Assessment 1 Reflection 1 (Module 1-4) template T2 22 Ver. 1.0ΙMay 2022Page3of3