This report covers quality management system issues with a focus on the philosophy of QMS, various tools used to measure and improve quality, ISO 9001 requirements, and the process of attainment. Learn about the importance of quality management system and its implementation in organizations.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM1 Quality Management System Student’s Name Institutional Affiliation Course Tutor Date:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM2 Introduction The organization is made up of different resources such as capital, human, raw material and fixed assets whether small or big. As companies grow, these resources increases and continue to interact to produces satisfactory products. The production and management method at times are undocumented and does not have a systematic methodology to have a safe and ethical outcome (Eslamy, Newman & Weinberger, 2014). Therefore, the development and need for a quality management system that controls the production process to ensure that customers feelsafeandcomfortablewiththeirpurchases.Thefollowingreportcoversquality management system issues with a focus on the philosophy of QMS, a various tool used to measure and improve quality, ISO 9001 requirements, and process of attainment the same regarding Mauritius. Quality management system refers to a formalized system that documents process, responsibilities, procedures for achieving quality policies and objectives in an organization. Therefore the system aids the organization to communicate to the employee the expectations of a product about the quality specifications (Frisch, 2012). Quality, management dates back in the 1950s,whentheJapanesecompaniesemphasizeonthequalitythroughouttheentire organization under the leadership of W. Edwards Deming. Deming was able to create 14 points that are useful to managers in enhancing the quality of products since he believed that the quality of the product was majorly caused by the management faultiness (Hudson, 2012). According to Deming, the major two concepts of quality improvement are common causes of error and special causes of error. The systematic are shared various personnel, and machines, paper products design, unsuitable raw materials; while special causes are associated with an
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM3 organization’s employee and the equipment, inadequate training, and skills. Other scholars who influenced the development of Quality management are Joseph Juran.Like Deming, Juran worked with Japanese organizations with a focus on improving quality and later established Juang Institute in 1979. According to Juran, Quality refers to the fitness of the product to fit the users’ needs without the worry of defects. Another contributor was Philip Crosby who focused on reducing cost through quality improvement. Crosby quality philosophy was based on: conformance to requirements, doing the right thing for the first time is cheaper, and performance is measured through “zero defect.” This led to the development of Critical for Quality (CoQ) Due to the need for quality management across the world, American manufacturing companies initiated the systems in 18980s after the Japanese footsteps in various companies such as Ford Motors, and later the establishment of Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award as a tool to recognize and promote quality management across the United States (Psomas & Kafetzopoulos, 2014). Thus since the 1980s to date, quality issues have been a significant aspect in all industries across the world as well as the setting of various standards such as ISO 9000. Over these years,Quality Management requires organizations to develop various environmentally friendly practices. Employers are always responsible for safety and health and waste management system. The whole system is the responsibility of both managers and employees. Since the inception of the quality management, different quality improvement tools havebeendeveloped,andeffectivenessdidontheorganization,typeofproductand management. Some of the main used tools are Six Sigma that was developed at Motorola in the 1980s to measure and improve the high-volume production process and later used in other
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM4 service companies such as Citibank and American Express. Six Sigma refers to a statistical measuring tool that has less than 3.4 defects per million and integrates other statistical tools such as statistical process control, design management, and total quality management; thus the objective of Six Sigma thus was to eliminate waste in order to achieve a perfect result(Odendaal & Claasen,2012,p.4). Initially, it was perceived as a manufacturing-oriented tool, how it has proven beneficial in the nonmanufacturing processes such as marketing and information systems (Kornfeld & Kara, 2013, p.6). To effectively implement six sigma improved tool, the following process is essential: StagesActionsAim Definition stageIn this stage, the company defines customer’s requirements while understanding how this requirement will have an impact on different opportunities in the organization The aim is to identify different issues that are negatively affecting quality management MeasureIn this stage, requires one to validate the integrity of the collect information To enhance the understanding of the performance process as well as the key measures in the quality improvement AnalyzeIn this stage, the company leverage all the statistical tools Validation aims to determine the key measures of quality
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM5 that are needed in establishing a quality improvement plan improvement ImproveThis stage entails the implementation of the quality is improvement plan and determining the financial effect of the implementation The aim to enhance the performance of the entire process or the organization ControlDocumentation of all the implementation and validating stability of the process The aim is to determine the implementation control measures Another commonly applied tool is the Value Stream Mapping (VSM) that refers to the lean manufacturing tool that focuses on mapping the organization's process of product movement from the supplier to the final user while identifying the delays and non-value adding process, to enhance the product quality (Bhamu, Kumar & Sangwan, 2012). The tool entails the development of two maps: Current State Map and Future State Map that will show the progressive improvement of the CSM. The CSM requires the leader to account for the significant proportions of the total annual production volume and sales earnings and is always tracked back to the source of the raw materials. Different data such as from the store are always recorded to aid in developing the current state map. After the capturing of all the information, the timeline is used to identify any value-adding aspects as well as the identification and elimination of any source of wastes to enhance quality. Based on the status of the current state map, future state map is developed while taking into account all the value-adding steps and waste elimination
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM6 through the application of lean thinking. The tool is used by supply chain organization such as Toyota Motors, Amazon Retailers and many others (Meudt Metternich & Abele, 2017). ISO 9001 founded in 1987 by the International Organizational standard refers to the international standards that specific requirements for the quality management, menu system (Wolniak, 2017). ISO 9001 is the most popular standard in the ISO 900 series since most of the organizations apply the set standards to illustrate their capability to consistently offer products and services that meet customer needs and the regulatory requirements. ISO requirements that are mandatory for the QMS are: a)General requirements provide all the requirements needed for the quality management system such as Quality manual that fully describes the scope of QMS in detail; Control documents that ensure that there are efficient communication and consistency in the execution process; and Control record of providing data evidence and retaining the record for future use. b)Management responsibility focuses on outlining the customer commitment requirements and quality policy and objectives of the organization. The standard requires the top management of the organization to be committed in the implementation of the product quality process (Kacmar, 2013). Therefore, every organization leadership structure should be based on ability to handle quality change process. c)Additionally, the management should also focus on improving customer experience and satisfaction through conducting a customer satisfaction survey to determine opportunities for improvement. d)Resource management focuses on the policies required for the management to provide resources such as infrastructure, good working benevolent to the human capital. These
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM7 are achieved through creating competence, creating awareness of quality requirements and training of the employees to acquire relevant skills and knowledge (Dibia, Dhakal & Onuh, 2012, p.370). By taking the employees through the ISO 9000 training courses, they can maintain the quality of the production to ensure continual improvement. e)Product realization requires every company to have a distinctive plan for products and services such as fully illustrating the products requirements, design and development as well as product control. f)Measurement Analysis and improvement focus on the ability of a company to determine the QMS and how to improve the QMS. The section entails monitoring and measurement sections, product monitoring process, internal audit as well as the customer satisfaction's requirement. The organization can use different programs to identify improvement opportunities such as a customer satisfaction survey and employee’s suggestion programs. The evaluation of the ISO 9000 does not entail large cost or reduction of the quality; rather it requires enough knowledge and experience on the results of the various operations process. In most of the organizations, the evaluations of ISO 9000 are based on organizational performance indicators (Meshkani, Rastekenari & Eslamparast 2013). Any company that is employing ISO 9000 on its daily operations should be able to achieve improved customer satisfaction since there is enhanced interaction with customers and the reduction of customer’s complaints. The improved customer’s satisfaction then is translated into the entire organizational performance as a large number of customer purchases and repurchase from the company. Secondly, the company should be able to obtain enhanced employee satisfaction as most of the activities tend to motivate employees to complete the assigned tasks.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM8 The effectiveness of the ISO 9000 implementation in an organization can also be evaluated through the determination of the values of efficiencies through the application of the following formula:RSant=(VFakt)/(Vplan), where RSant-Relative Efficiency, VFakt-Real Value and Vplan-Planned Value. This evaluation method is simple since it does not need to evaluate the resources used in implementing the ISO 9000 and improving the organization's performance (Meshkani, Rastekenari & Eslamparast 2013). Before every evaluation process, the performance indicators are always presented in the description process, and based on data collected; the manager does the analyze on form like in table 1. This same format can be applied in evaluating QMS conformity to a quality standard, evaluation of quality culture of the organizations as well as evaluation of managing principles of an organization for sustained success. processCriterionEvaluation Indicator Real ValuePlanned Value Relative efficiency The Expected Results Table 1: Shows effectiveness evaluation form obtained from (Meshkani, Rastekenari & Eslamparast 2013). The third party refers to an independent organization that is responsible for overseeing and implementing the quality management issues and policies into various companies by the set standard of the ISO 9001(Etilé & Teyssier, 2016, p.399). These organization such as Fair Trade and national Laboratories commonly known as certification bodies and always audits various business to ensure that products and services are both safe and ethical after that approve the companies by certifying them. The process always gives consumers the urge for consumption
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM9 since they feel safe and comfortable with various purchases. The organization gets certified by following a specific process and meeting particular requirements. a.The first step is developing the management system by identifying the core of the business process, document the properly and share them with various stakeholders. b.The second step is the implementation of the system through ensuring that all process adheres to the description and all employees are trained with the required skill (Kramer, 2013). Additionally, there must be effective monitoring, evaluation, and improvement and reporting channels. c.The third step is to verifying the effectiveness of the system through an internal auditor to determine the streets and weakness of the quality management system. The organization at that point takes relevant corrective measures. d.The fourth step is the registration of the system through a certified body. The certifying organization should contact a relevant certification body that uses CASCO standard and ensures that the third party certifying company is credited with ISO 9000, 9004 and 19011(Javorcik & Sawada, 2018). At this stage, the company might contact different bodies such as Mauritius Public Accountant to ensurethatthefinancialstatementsareauditedandapprovedasperthe Companies Act, 2001. Additionally, the Mauritius Committee on corporate Governance ensures that every company is managed by the set corporate governance requirements. An ISO 9001 certified QMS could be effectively managed on an on-going basis through having a well-structured measuring, monitoring, implementation and improvement yardstick to
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 10 every department and process (Yeung, 2017). The QMS has to continuously collect data and analysis to ensure that every system of production is up to standard. Through this, the management maintains track on the quality objectives and performance is capable of developing new performance and able to determine any obstacle that might hinder quality attainment. It is upon the management to ensure all the identified improvement opportunities are supported by every stakeholder such as employee, customers, leaders, and suppliers through proper communication and engagement. Conclusion From the above report, quality management is an ancient process that benefits all the stakeholders of an organization and quality provision is a responsibility of all stakeholders. The introduction of ISO 9000 is significant as it ensures that product and services production and provision are in accordance to the set standards, the third-party certification companies approve organizations after the systematic process and attainment of the required standard. References Bhamu, J., Kumar, J. and Sangwan, K. (2012). Productivity and quality improvement through value stream mapping: a case study of the Indian automotive industry.International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 10(3), p.288.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 11 Dibia, I., Dhakal, H. and Onuh, S. (2012). Lean: a continuous improvement philosophy in agile systems based on quality management principles.International Journal of Agile Systems and Management, 5(4), p.370. Eslamy, H., Newman, B. and Weinberger, E. (2014). Quality Improvement in Neonatal Digital Radiography: Implementing the Basic Quality Improvement Tools.Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI, 35(6), pp.608-626. Etilé, F. and Teyssier, S. (2016). Signaling Corporate Social Responsibility: Third-Party Certification versus Brands.The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 118(3), pp.397-432. Frisch, M. (2012). Pioneers in Quality of Life Research: Section Introduction.Applied Research in Quality of Life, 7(3), pp.327-329. Hudson, K. (2012). Pioneers of Quality-W. Edwards Deming.Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 28(3), pp.247-248. Javorcik, B. and Sawada, N. (2018). The ISO 9000 certification: Little pain, big gain?.European Economic Review, 105, pp.103-114. Kacmar, M. (2013). Implementation of Link-based DMS Supporting ISO 9001 QMS: Case Study.Quality Innovation Prosperity, 17(2). Kornfeld, B. and Kara, S. (2013). Selection of Lean and Six Sigma projects in the industry.International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 4(1), pp.4-16. Kramer, A. (2013). Quality Assessing the Quality Assessment*.Critical Care Medicine, 41(8), pp.2040-2041.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 12 Meshkani, F., Rastekenari, M. and Eslamparast, M. (2013). Evaluation the Relationship between Resource Dependence Theory is Based on the ISO 9000 with Operating Performance in ISO 9000 Certificated Companies : Case Study : Gilan Province.Singaporean Journal of Business , Economics and Management Studies, 2(5), pp.30-37. Meudt, T., Metternich, J. and Abele, E. (2017). Value stream mapping 4.0: Holistic examination of the value stream and information logistics in production.CIRP Annals, 66(1), pp.413-416. Odendaal, C. and Claasen, S. (2012). SIX SIGMA AS A TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT TOOL.The South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 13(1),p1-16. Psomas, E. and Kafetzopoulos, D. (2014). Performance measures of ISO 9001 certified and non- certified manufacturing companies.Benchmarking: An International Journal, 21(5), pp.756-774. Wolniak, R. (2017). Analysis of the relationship between using certificates ISO 9001 vs. ISO 14001 and ISO 9001 vs. ISO/ TS 16949.Scientific Papers of the Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series, 2017(108), pp.421-430. Yeung, S. (2017). Linking ISO 9000 (QMS), ISO 26000 (CSR) with accreditation requirements for quality indicators in higher education.Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 29(13-14), pp.1594-1611.