Quantitative and Qualitative Job Insecurity and Well-being

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE JOB INSECURITY AND WELL-BEING 1
Quantitative and Qualitative Job Insecurity and Well-being
Student’s Name
Affiliation

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE JOB INSECURITY AND WELL-BEING 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction 3
2. Background of the Study 3
3. Research Question 4
4. Measures 4
5. Research Methodology 5
a. Data analysis 5
b. Reliability of results 6
c. Discussion 7
d. Analysis of hypothesis 8
7. Limitations 10
8. Conclusion 11
9. References 12

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE JOB INSECURITY AND WELL-BEING 3
Quantitative and Qualitative Job Insecurity and Well-being
1. Introduction
Recent studies show that Job insecurity has raised various concerns about the employees’
long term and working conditions of their future jobs. The research study focuses on the side
effects on the employee's issues with continued lack of confidence in their job referred to as
quantitative job insecurity. Arguably such relations have impacted to the threats on employment-
related insecurity qualitatively. The main objective for carrying out this research was to
investigate existing overall strength relations linking quantitative job insecurity and qualitative
work insecurity of employees also by considering their general well-being. The study also
conducted ways of controlling socio-demographic issues, negative effects on job associations by
using samples of Belgian bank workers (Lăzăroiu, 2015).
2. Background of the study
Job insecurity as a global challenge began in early 1984 concerning the future of the
employees and their working conditions. Quantitative job insecurity has inspired many
organizations in structuring the associated costs for the loss of work. Evidently from research
quantitative job uncertainty is linked with the poor and the well - being of workers. While the
qualitative job uncertainty perceives the threats of low-quality standards in the working place
such as reduced salary and deteriorating working conditions (Khan et al., 2012). However, the
study focuses on the three areas that are: the importance of quantitative and qualitative job
uncertainty, results from those two combinations and employees interests.
De Witte et al. (2010) asserts that the conditional relationship of quantitative view of
employment insecurity is strongly attached to ill health conditions, brain stressors, and strain.
While the qualitative aspect of employment insecurity is strongly attached to the attitudes

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE JOB INSECURITY AND WELL-BEING 4
towards job satisfaction. It was revealed that some poor interests of the well being of the
employees are strongly attached to a quantitative view. Both the aspects contribute to various
negative issues of concern of their workers understanding (Lastad et al., 2015). Research
questions
Study question investigates the relationship between the two employment insecurity of
employees and their individual interests. Investigate proper reason for collecting data by
responding why the sample led size was necessary? Discuss the benefits and shortcomings of
using random sampling method? Responding to the validity of the variables of measures and
comment on the negative and positive side of the research design used.
3. Research methodology
a. Data collection and respondents
In an attempt to tackle these questions, a sample of 15,000 employees was surveyed to
answer some of the questions asked comprehensively to complete the questionnaire through
internal dispatch for every bank. All the sixty-three banks were involved in the survey and
21% of their workers responded by joining the survey (Vander, 2014). The participants were
randomly selected with no specific level of age, gender or the rank of the employee. The
participants received the questionnaire through their emails that were sent by their employers
based on their personalized addresses. The respondent returned the completed questionnaire
using their bank mails and a team of researchers collected the filled questionnaires from each
bank (Garcia, 2014).
4. Measures