Reflective writing.

my task is to write a reflection of approximately 300 words (+/-10%), to the feedback my tutor provided to my first essay and from other sources listed below: • UTS Academic Writing Analytics: https://acawriter.uts.edu.au/ • Grammarly: https://app.grammarly.com/ • ProWritingAid: https://prowritingaid.com • Hemmingway Editor: http://www.hemingwayapp.com/ As part of this exercise you need to (at a minimum): 1.Submit your essay to at least one writing analytics tools from the list below. 2. Reflect on the feedback provided by the writing analysis tool. 3. Re-draft your essay using this feedback. Prepare a “Writing reflection” (instructions in the attachment), accounting for how you used the feedback from the analytics tool, Turnitin similarity report and other resources to improve your written communication in your essay, which you submit, with supporting evidence.

Running head: Reflective writing
Reflective writing
Name of the student
Name of university
Authors note

Running head: Reflective writing
I need to make my arguments clearer and use simple language to communicate with the readers.
Even though the main ideas were clear,I need to develop my argument properly so that I am able
to substantiate the ideas with information.
I have used the essay structure and I have also used the Introduction to use the main argument.
Therefore, the introduction has provided the overview of the paper. Even though the structure of
the essay is maintained, the sequencing of ideas needs improvisation. The organization of the
essay had the elements of the basic argument and purpose of the essay was well focused.
However ideas need to presented in a proper sequence so that the reader glides over the read.
I have focused on the structure of the essay and I have realised that I did not incorporate my
sense of thinking, therefore was unable to weave the ideas into a systematic coherent whole.
Lack of involvement with the project hindered me get into the complex ideas and provide me
with limited clarity. As a result, my conclusion is mostly managerial in nature and lacks the
counterfactual thinking. I did not question the taken for granted areas and did not use my
reflective thinking. I have learned to use the information available but I think I need use my
perception to analyses them. The content I have used is accurate and presented in clear fashion.
The use of resources also meets the number of references in a systematic manner. The sentences
are well structures but the grammar is needs to correct. I have to improve the grammar, syntax,
mechanics and sometimes spelling. This is the major area to focus I have learned about the
technicalities of references, use of intent and format of a particular style and so on. I need to
improve my reading style that would add to my communication skills.

Running head: Reflective writing
Appendix
Fig: 1

Running head: Reflective writing
Fig: 2

Running head: Reflective writing
Fig:3