Implementation Plan for Royale Pizza

This document provides an implementation plan for Royale Pizza's business expansion, including management structure, skills of stakeholders, and monitoring process.

Running Head: ROYALE PIZZA
ROYALE PIZZA
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

1ROYALE PIZZA
Table of Contents
Implementation Plan..................................................................................................................2
Surrounding of case study......................................................................................................2
Management structure, Style and culture...............................................................................2
Level of autonomy authority..................................................................................................3
Skills and attributes of stakeholders.......................................................................................3
Monitoring and controlling process...........................................................................................4
Schedule.................................................................................................................................4
Resource Sheet.......................................................................................................................6
Project Performance Evaluation...............................................................................................12
Project Closure.........................................................................................................................13
References................................................................................................................................14

2ROYALE PIZZA
Implementation Plan
Surrounding of case study
The Case study revolves around the business management of the Royale Pizza
wanting to expand their business system. They have been in the food business for the last 20
years now. They have both online and offline food serving and selling options. Their main
focus is on developing the quality of the food that they are selling. This imbibes the fact that
better commencing of the business management gets better due to the processing and
providing of better quality food. Another concern of the business organization is to reduce the
wastage of food that takes place in their cooking process. This process requires
implementation of the processing of the renovation of the entire process. This have been the
main motive of the project.
Management structure, Style and culture
The matrix structure that is implemented in this case. In the matrix structure the main
advantage that is received includes proper management of the functional process of the
business management (Milosevic and Martinelli 2016). The main aspect that is taken into
consideration is that the reporting structure of the resources are taken into consideration for
this process. This is the main reason that proper development of the business management as
well as the renovation process is expected to get completed in a faster and better manner.
As in this case project manager is the head of the project. The technical engineer also
plays an equivalent important role in the processing of the renovation process as the project
manager. The technical engineer reports to the project manager. Contractors has to combine
with the technical engineer to function (Kerzner and Kerzner 2017). Under the contractor the
entire work force will be present. The equipment supplier and the installer and the labors are

3ROYALE PIZZA
present. The completion of the project is highly dependent on the processing of the contractor
and his stakeholders functioning as well and hence the matrix structure is to be followed.
The management style that is followed is the authoritative management style. In
authoritative case the manger needs to have long term vision. This long term vision will help
in understanding the risks that are present in the commencing of the business. This is one of
the main reason that this management style have been successful (Schwalbe 2015). With the
help of this structure the employees get a fair bit of freedom for completion of the project.
This ensures that better execution of the project will take place. Proper feedback is also
provided in this stage. This will ensure that in case the manager of the project is going wrong,
hen will be provided with honest feedbacks. This will help him understanding proper
management section of the project (Eskerod and Jepsen 2016).
Management by design culture is the management culture that will be used. This
ensures the fact that better performing of the functional process is performed. In this case
several charts regarding scheduling of the project, inclusion of budget management table will
also be included in the process.
Level of autonomy authority
The level of autonomy is high in this project. This insists the fact that the entire
projects is dependent on the functionality of the project manager, technical engineer and the
contractors, the shop owners have no say in the process that will be implemented.
Skills and attributes of stakeholders
The skills that are needed to be present includes having proper project scheduling,
budget management, proper installing of the new appliances skill must also be present among
the stakeholders. Technical engineering skills are highly required for execution of this
project.

4ROYALE PIZZA
Monitoring and controlling process
Internal factors that will be analyzed includes values, attitude and priorities of the
employees who are working. The external aspect that is to be analyzed includes customers,
competition, economy, technology used, political and social aspects are considered as the
external aspects of the project management system.
Schedule
WBS
ID Activity Description
Precedenc
e Duration Estimate
Cost
Estimate
$44,552.00
1 Design 30 days $5,560.00
1.1 performing research 3 $480.00
1.2 developing of the
expected design 3 5 $1,000.00
1.3 budget estimation 4 4 $800.00
1.4 planning feasibility of
the project 5 4 $640.00
1.5
Plan the new design as
per the office will be
renovated
6 4 $800.00
1.6 estimating resources that
will be required 7 2 $320.00
1.7 interview the CEO
regarding his needs 8 2 $320.00
1.8 theoretical data
collection 9 4 $800.00
1.9 Primary data collection 10 2 $400.00
2 Procurement and
delivery 65 days $19,000.00
2.1 Starting of execution 11 3 $480.00
2.2 Buying of air condition 13,5 4 $640.00
2.3 delivery of the product 14 6 $960.00
2.4 buying of 3 deep fryers 15 5 $1,800.00
2.5 delivery of the product 16 5 $1,800.00
2.6 Buying of 1 dough roller 17 6 $2,160.00

5ROYALE PIZZA
2.7 delivery of the product 18 6 $2,160.00
2.8 buying of 2 boilers 19 5 $1,800.00
2.9 delivery of the product 20 6 $2,160.00
2.10 buying of chair and
tables 21 3 $1,080.00
2.11 delivery of the product 22 6 $2,160.00
3 Construction phase 30 days $7,280.00
3.1 prototype creation 23 4 $800.00
3.2 setting of standard 25 5 $1,000.00
3.3 removing of stair case 26 5 $1,320.00
3.4 Creation of dining space 27 6 $1,584.00
3.5 demolition plan 28 3 $792.00
3.6 Floor designing 29 3 $792.00
3.7 kitchen designing 30 3 $792.00
3.8 Wire management 31 1 $200.00
4 Installation 60 days $12,712.00
4.1 Installation of Air
condition 32 7 $1,400.00
4.2 installing 3 deep fryers 34 8 $1,600.00
4.3 installing 2 boilers 35 8 $1,600.00
4.4 installing 1 dough roller 36 8 $1,600.00
4.5 Painting 37 8 $2,112.00
4.6 Monitoring and
controlling 38 8 $1,280.00
4.7 risk management 39 8 $1,920.00
4.8 Safety check 40 5 $1,200.00
The above chart displayed shows the tasks that are to be performed as per the
processing of the management of the renovation process. The areas that are to be monitored
includes processing of the designing phase. Proper monitoring of the procurement and the

6ROYALE PIZZA
delivery phase will also be required. Monitoring in the construction phase is also required.
Installation of the entire project is also performed (Lientz and Rea 2016). Usage of project
management tool, Scoro can be beneficial for the monitoring of the project. Implementation
of Gantt chart will also be beneficial.
The tool that can be used for performing time monitoring in the project includes
TimeCamp. The main reason of selecting the same includes proper accessing of the tracking
of the project delay along with the progress of the project. Proper understanding of the time
that is taken for completion of each tasks is also well tracked (Hornstein 2015).
The tool that is used for the monitoring of the cost expenditure includes SAP. This
section involves the fact that proper management of the business management is performed
as per the commencing of the ERP system implementation that will help in proper monitoring
of the cost (Heagney 2016).
Teamweek is the tool that will be used for the resource monitoring phase. This
imbibes the fact that better understanding of the management purpose of the entire resource
list can be monitored.
Usage of control charts for performing the quality monitoring process will be helpful
as it compares the data generated during the functional process with the data that is supposed
to be generated (Muller and Turner 2017).
Resource Sheet
W
B
S
Re
so
ur
ce
Dir
ect
Cos
ts
Indi
rect
Cos
ts
Tot
al
Esti
mat
e
Met
hod
Constrains
/
Assumptio
ns Additional Information
1.
1
Pro
ject
ma
$48
0.00
$480.
00
Acco
unt
anal
Time will be
the main
constraint

7ROYALE PIZZA
nag
er ysis
1.
2
Tec
hni
cal
Ma
nag
er
$80
0.00
$800.
00
Acco
unt
anal
ysis
Testing of the
design will be a
constraint
1.
3
Tec
hni
cal
Ma
nag
er
$64
0.00
$640.
00
Acco
unt
anal
ysis Unexpected risk
arrival
1.
4
Pro
ject
ma
nag
er
$64
0.00
$640.
00
Acco
unt
anal
ysis
Standard setting
is arbitrary
hence reults
might vary
1.
5
Tec
hni
cal
Ma
nag
er
$64
0.00
$640.
00
Acco
unt
anal
ysis
Prototype
designing is the
major issue
1.
6
Pro
ject
ma
nag
er
$32
0.00
$320.
00
Acco
unt
anal
ysis NI constraint
1.
7
Pro
ject
ma
nag
er
$32
0.00
$320.
00
Acco
unt
anal
ysis No constraints
1.
8
Tec
hni
cal
Ma
nag
er
$64
0.00
$640.
00
Acco
unt
anal
ysis
Research tikme
will be a
constraint
1.
9
Tec
hni
cal
Ma
nag
er
$32
0.00
$320.
00
Acco
unt
anal
ysis No constraint
2. equ $43 $432. Acco Improper
planning might

8ROYALE PIZZA
1
ip
me
nt
sup
plie
r
2.00 00 unt
anal
ysis be a constraint
2.
2
equ
ip
me
nt
sup
plie
r
$57
6.00
$576.
00 Acco
unt
anal
ysis No constraint
2.
3
equ
ip
me
nt
sup
plie
r
$86
4.00
$2,0
00
$2,86
4
Acco
unt
anal
ysis No constraint
2.
4
sho
p
sup
erv
isor
,
equ
ip
me
nt
sup
plie
r
$1,4
40.0
0
$1,44
0.00
Acco
unt
anal
ysis No constraint
2.
6
sho
p
sup
erv
isor
,
equ
ip
me
nt
sup
plie
r
$1,4
40.0
0
$450
$1,89
0
Acco
unt
anal
ysis No constraint
2.
7
sho
p
sup
erv
$1,7
28.0
0
$1,72
8.00
Acco
unt
anal
ysis No constraint

9ROYALE PIZZA
isor
,
equ
ip
me
nt
No
cons
train
t
sup
plie
r
2.
8
sho
p
sup
erv
isor
,
equ
ip
me
nt
sup
plie
r
$1,7
28.0
0
$2,4
99
$4,22
7
Acco
unt
anal
ysis No constraint
2.
9
sho
p
sup
erv
isor
,
equ
ip
me
nt
sup
plie
r
$1,4
40.0
0
$1,44
0.00
Acco
unt
anal
ysis No constraint
2.
1
0
sho
p
sup
erv
isor
,
equ
ip
me
nt
sup
$1,4
40.0
0
$2,5
00
$3,94
0
Acco
unt
anal
ysis
No constraint

10ROYALE PIZZA
plie
r
2.
1
1
sho
p
sup
erv
isor
,
equ
ip
me
nt
sup
plie
r
$1,7
28.0
0
$1,72
8.00
Acco
unt
anal
ysis No constraint
2.
1
2
sho
p
sup
erv
isor
,
equ
ip
me
nt
sup
plie
r
$86
4.00
$1,0
00
$1,86
4
Acco
unt
anal
ysis No constraint
2.
1
3
sho
p
sup
erv
isor
,
equ
ip
me
nt
sup
plie
r
$1,7
28.0
0
$1,72
8.00
Acco
unt
anal
ysis No constraint
3.
1
Tec
hni
cal
Ma
nag
er
$64
0.00
$640.
00
Acco
unt
anal
ysis Designing
constraint
3.
2
Tec
hni
$80
0.00
$800.
00
Acco
unt
Designing
constraint

11ROYALE PIZZA
cal
Ma
nag
er
anal
ysis
3.
3
con
trac
tor
$72
0.00
$720.
00
Acco
unt
anal
ysis Designing
constraint
3.
4
con
trac
tor
$86
4.00 $1,0
00
$1,86
4
Acco
unt
anal
ysis Designing
constraint
3.
5
con
trac
tor
$43
2.00
$432.
00
Acco
unt
anal
ysis Designing
constraint
3.
6
con
trac
tor
$43
2.00
$432.
00
Acco
unt
anal
ysis Designing
constraint
3.
7
con
trac
tor
$43
2.00
$432.
00
Acco
unt
anal
ysis Designing
constraint
3.
8
Tec
hni
cal
Ma
nag
er
$16
0.00
$160.
00
Acco
unt
anal
ysis Designing
constraint
4.
1
inst
alle
r
$1,0
08.0
0
$1,00
8.00
Acco
unt
anal
ysis Technical
constraint
4.
2
inst
alle
r
$1,1
52.0
0
$1,15
2.00
Acco
unt
anal
ysis Designing
constraint
4.
3
inst
alle
r
$1,1
52.0
0
$1,15
2.00
Acco
unt
anal
ysis Designing
constraint
4.
4
inst
alle
r
$1,1
52.0
0
$1,15
2.00
Acco
unt
anal
ysis Designing
constraint

12ROYALE PIZZA
4.
5
con
trac
tor
$1,1
52.0
0
$1,15
2.00
Acco
unt
anal
ysis Designing
constraint
4.
6
Pai
nte
r
$1,2
80.0
0 $5,0
00
$6,28
0
Acco
unt
anal
ysis Designing
constraint
4.
7
saf
ety
cert
ific
atio
n
bod
y
$1,1
52.0
0
$1,15
2.00 Acco
unt
anal
ysis Designing
constraint
4.
8
saf
ety
cert
ific
atio
n
bod
y
$72
0.00
$720.
00 Acco
unt
anal
ysis Designing
constraint
Due to delay in the completion of project
for 60 days, calculating a daily fine of
$300, the company will be paying a fine
of $18,300
Project Performance Evaluation
The strategies and techniques that are to be followed doing project performance
evaluation includes comparing the completion time taken for activities of the project with the
projected time that was stated during the initiation of the project (Kerzner 2019). In case the
activities are performed as per the scheduled manner it is said to be a successful project.
Usage of MS Project tool can be used for creation of the schedule (Hazır 2015). After the
completion of the project the quality of the project is checked. In case the standards that were
set during the initiation of the project are followed the project evaluation can be performed
and positive results can be expected (Gan and Chin 2019). The technique that can be used
includes change management process. Cost estimation strategy is also important for the

13ROYALE PIZZA
processing of the project performance evaluation process. Stakeholders satisfaction is the
most important and vital strategy that is used for the processing of the performance
evaluation process.
Project Closure
Performing of the root cause analysis after the completion of the project will help in
understanding the risks mitigation after completion of the project. The risks that are
performed in this case are detected and mitigated (Abramova, Pires and Bernardino 2016).
The wiring issue is the main risk after completion of the project. Technical engineer will be
responsible for mitigating this issue as it was planned. Safety board will check the same and
provide them with certification which will mark the closure stage of the project (Battisti
2018). The closure stage activities include risk management, risk mitigation and certification
of the safety control.

14ROYALE PIZZA
References
Abramova, V., Pires, F. and Bernardino, J., 2016. Open source vs proprietary project
management tools. In New Advances in Information Systems and Technologies (pp. 331-340).
Springer, Cham.
Battisti, C., 2018. Unifying the trans-disciplinary arsenal of project management tools in a
single logical framework: Further suggestion for IUCN project cycle development. Journal
for Nature Conservation, 41, pp.63-72.
Eskerod, P. and Jepsen, A.L., 2016. Project stakeholder management. Routledge.
Gan, R.C.C. and Chin, C.M., 2019. Project Management Guide and Project Management
Maturity Models as Generic Tools Capable for Diverse Applications. In Diverse Applications
and Transferability of Maturity Models (pp. 269-315). IGI Global.
Hazır, Ö., 2015. A review of analytical models, approaches and decision support tools in
project monitoring and control. International Journal of Project Management, 33(4), pp.808-
815.
Heagney, J., 2016. Fundamentals of project management. Amacom.
Hornstein, H.A., 2015. The integration of project management and organizational change
management is now a necessity. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2),
pp.291-298.
Kerzner, H. and Kerzner, H.R., 2017. Project management: a systems approach to planning,
scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
Kerzner, H., 2019. Using the project management maturity model: strategic planning for
project management. Wiley.

15ROYALE PIZZA
Lientz, B. and Rea, K., 2016. Breakthrough technology project management. Routledge.
Milosevic, D.Z. and Martinelli, R.J., 2016. Project management toolbox: tools and
techniques for the practicing project manager. John Wiley & Sons.
Muller, R. and Turner, J.R., 2017. Project-oriented leadership. Routledge.
Schwalbe, K., 2015. Information technology project management. Cengage Learning.