SBM 1300 - Research Project.

Hi there, it is research project (thesis). i have attached assignment details and (feasibility analysis and Analysis of methodologies) previous parts for this final proposal. please follow the marking criteria and rubric, i need excellent marking and follow guidelines and structure for this assignment. it is continuous parts for my previous orders ID 1031378, 1031379 i have made some changes as per my lecture suggestions...i have uploaded those files which i have made changes and submitted to my university. please make it perfect .. i need with presentation slides (10 slides) for this proposal.

Running head: RESEARCH PROPOSAL
SBM 1300 – Research Project
Analysis of critical success factors of construction projects in Australia, a case
study of Perth Arena Project
Assessment: Part B - Research Proposal
Name of the Student: Manojkranthi Bathini (201801000)
Lecturer: Dr. Tas Adam
Supervision: Dr. Ming Juan Ding

1RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Abstract
The research study aims to identify critical success factors for the Perth Arena Project in
construction industry. The factors are to be identified from the existing literature and among
which the researcher identified that time and cost are main factors caused the project delays.
Both quantitative and qualitative methods are selected to collect and analyze the data. Based on
the research objectives and research questions, the researcher developed a survey questionnaire
to facilitate the data collection process. Five construction managers in the project will be selected
to perform interviews. The eighty participants including employees from Buckeridge Group of
companies (BGC), contractors and suppliers involved in the project will be randomly selected to
fill the designed questionnaires. Based on the literature review, the hypotheses will be developed.
The regression analysis will be used to analyse the data collected. After reviewing the literature,
specific critical success factors as well as questionnaire survey, the research project is consisted
to establish the factors which are required to be managed. From the entire study, it was found
that lack of top management support is a factor affecting development work of Perth Arena.
From the results, it is shown that in Perth Arena Project, there is sudden increase in project
budget due to improper governance structure and it leads to time delays. Further investigation of
the data highlighted significance of scope, quality and technical factors affect the project success.
It is recommended that there should be a proper approach to motivate project team members,
encourage the managers to be effective and proper planning skills.
Keywords: Critical success factors, project delay, time, cost, construction project.

2RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Table of Contents
1. Research background and objectives...........................................................................................4
1.1 Background of the research study..........................................................................................4
1.1.1 Overview of Perth Arena Project....................................................................................5
1.2 Research objectives...............................................................................................................6
1.3 Research questions.................................................................................................................6
2. Literature Review and Hypotheses development........................................................................7
3. Methodology..............................................................................................................................11
3.1 Design and methodology.....................................................................................................11
3.2 Details of participants..........................................................................................................12
3.3 Description of materials.......................................................................................................13
3.4 Data analysis........................................................................................................................14
3.5 Ethical issues.......................................................................................................................15
6. Area for further research............................................................................................................16
References......................................................................................................................................18
Appendix 1.....................................................................................................................................22

3RESEARCH PROPOSAL
1. Research background and objectives
1.1 Background of the research study
The research study is reflected on analyzing the critical success factors of the
construction projects in Australia based on the case study of Perth Arena Project. The company
taken for analyzing the construction success factors is “Buckeridge Group of Companies
(BGC)”. Alruqi and Hallowell (2019) stated that the construction industry is at risk and because
of its complex nature in construction, there is extra risks added to the construction projects. The
construction project of Perth Arena is a challenge for the contractors as well as client because of
higher project budget as well as scheduling needs. Mhatre, Thakkar and Maiti (2017) argued that
the project manager increases chances to complete the project as well as meet with the project
requirements by means of project planning and execution. The Perth Arena Project suffers to
meet with its project deadlines as well as budget; therefore these two factors need huge
consideration. This paper will discuss on causes of project delays and explore critical success
factors. The project is considered as achievement when the development is to be complete on
time, budget as well as quality. The project is succeeding with standards which help the project
participants for completion of project.
In the construction projects, there are challenges for the project clients as well as
contractors for delivering the project because of increase in complexity of designing and
stakeholder’s involvement. For the contractor, the project is succeeding when the contractor can
get profit from the project work. The project is measured as success when the project achieves on
the scientific performance specifications and superior level of satisfaction concerned the project
outcomes. Chou and Pramudawardhani (2015) discussed that there is successful achievement of
time, cost as well as time are measured as project management success straightly, the project

4RESEARCH PROPOSAL
contracts with the concluding project objectives. The project success is categorized in four
dimensions such as time, cost, quality and scope. Increasing the globalization project as well as
project management can add towards diverse mix and create challenge for the project manager.
Todorović et al. (2015) provided details that the project manager is required various project
management approaches, required management processes tailored to project requirements in
addition to selection of project manager having competencies. Larsen et al. (2015) argued that
ability to calculate proper predictions of cost is critical towards successful delivery of the project
plan.
1.1.1 Overview of Perth Arena Project
The Perth Arena is located on Northbridge Link site in Perth which was designed as
city’s most spacious and indoor sports as well as entertainment venue. Department of Housing
and Works (DHW) were accountable for development as well as contracting of this project plan.
The scheduled timeframe of this project was December 2009, while in the year 2007 the
contraction work was provide to Minister of Housing and Works. This project was significant for
Western Australia and due to inadequate governance, this project went behind for three years and
the completion schedule was commissioned in the year 2012. Time as well as cost is two main
critical success factors of construction project which was proved by analyzing the case study of
Perth Arena Project. Before conducting in-depth analysis of construction project, the authorities
were arrived estimation of time and calculation of cost. It was resulted in cost escalation as the
project cost was $483 million and due to issue it became $323 million more, means 200% more
than estimated value of $160 million (Raggatt 2017). Suddenly, DHW made changes in design as
well as contract documents without assessing the prices. It makes analysis whether it represented
value for the money. Inadequacies in governance of Perth Arena Project exposed to risks such as

5RESEARCH PROPOSAL
time as well as money. Therefore, the risks are remained due to cost escalation as well as time
delays.
1.2 Research objectives
The main aim of this research work is to explain the study of the literature and critical
success factors in the construction project of Perth Arena. The objectives of this research paper
are as follows:
 To determine the project success factors for successful completion of the Perth Arena
Construction Project
1.3 Research questions
The selected topic is based on exploring the critical success factors of Perth Arena
Construction Project. It is required to identify the factors so that the stakeholders can overcome
with the construction barriers to be competitive in the market. Following are list of the research
questions based on the research objective:
i. What are the critical success factors of Perth Arena construction project?
ii. How the cost and delay factors are correlated to the critical success in the construction
industry?
iii. What are causes of the project delays in Australia’s Perth Arena construction project?
The first research question will analyze the critical success factors in the construction project
cause delay in the construction of Perth Arena. Second research question is focused on the delay
factors related to the success factors. The third question is reflected on analyzing the causes of
project delays so that on time there is classification of impact of factors on accomplishment rate
of the construction project.

6RESEARCH PROPOSAL
2. Literature Review and Hypotheses development
The point of this research study is reflected on investigating critical success factors
influencing successful implementation of Perth Arena Project. Yan, Liu and Skitmore (2018)
defined that time and cost is main factors influence on the project outcome. Darko and Chan
(2016) viewed that the factors should obtain priority attention by the management as it can
constrain the business performance. Nguyen and Hadikusumo (2017) suggested that critical
success factors are important factors determine success and failure of the project. Successful
project completion is included top management support, project team competency as well as
proper mission of construction project. Raggatt (2017) argued that a project is successful to
prepare consistent project plan proceeding to the project design. The key project planning
credentials for Perth Arena Project were not at right place in the year 2009, therefore there was
extension of the time. It resulted to limit ability of DHW to run and direct entire construction
project. The project should require to schedule and organize the project activities for meeting
with project deadlines set from side of Australian government. It was required to identify if cost
and time are on-budget and in escalation. Caffieri et al. (2018) discussed that as the project
planning was not place at proper time, therefore cost and schedule escalation were occurred.
The project team of DHW was included improper project team members for the
construction project. Therefore, there is risk of the project due to lack of project governance
structure along with project insights. Maginn (2018) discussed that the project team members
should conduct poor record keeping on the project plan, therefore there is few evidences on
project planning, monitoring along with reporting. The governance arrangements are
strengthened, while the risks are remained of increase in project cost and time delays. The
findings of this literature study are that governance framework and also risk management can

7RESEARCH PROPOSAL
strengthen since the year 2009. Love et al. (2017) argued that daily basis management of the
construction project is resourced properly. Increase in project cost can reduce the project budget
available for fitting out and need extra funding. Bhargava et al. (2018) stated that uncertain
completion date can provide influence capacity to plan project events.
Lingard and Wakefield (2019) discussed that it is a key significant requirement to
manage daily activities of construction project and better resource management. Daily
administration of the project plan is robust for improving project credentials, and project
reporting. Greater resources are allocated to direct the Perth Arena Project. The project team is
responsible to monitor the construction work and analyze how much time is spent on the project.
The management group is receiving daily basis information on the budget spent in the project.
Zegarra and Alarcón (2019) mentioned that due to identification of project risks on time, there is
better management of the project resources and result in project success. In this particular
research paper, the success of project is being discussed in field of construction management. By
means of summary from the evaluation of project work, it is clear that there are two main critical
factors are taken to get project success such as project time and cost.
2.1 Cost factor
Approved budget of the construction work is $483 million, while there is an increase in
budget cost. Balashova and Gromova (2017) stated that when the construction cost increases,
then there are two possibilities. Either the project requires governmental funding or additional
project cost will require meeting as of $42 million budget for fit out of Arena Project. ()
discussed that it is risk of increasing the construction cost. The cost is increased due to change in

8RESEARCH PROPOSAL
design as well as construction requested by Australia state. All the critical success factors are
linked with each other as when there is increase in cost, the project is delayed.
According to Caffieri et al. (2018), after reviewing the business case of Perth Arena
Construction Project, there is reduction of forecasted annual operating profit to approximately
$3.1 million in initial year as well as $3.9 million in following years. There is $1 million less as
compared to the estimation which can forecast the operating profit $4.3 million in year one as
well as $5 million in following years. Revision of the estimation of budget showed that the
replacement cost of Perth Arena Project could approximately $4.8 million in one year (Bell and
Jones 2015). Government funding is also required for the project to bridge gap among operating
profit as well as capital replacement cost of the construction project.
Hypothesis 1: It is hypothesized that the cost factor has positive effects on the project success.
2.2 Time factor
Venues west had followed strategy to move from the completion of construction towards
operations. The date of completion of Perth Arena Project is at higher risk. According to Larsen
et al. (2015), agreed completion date of construction is 2011. The project manager accounted
that the project work was feasible and the construction work was completed by 2011, Arena was
operational in time for 2012. The construction work was extended beyond 2011 after the
construction completion, and then there was addition of three months to schedule time and
caused delay at the opening date beyond 2012. Raggatt (2017) stated that uncertain completion
of this construction project affected capacity to engage the private sector on positive terms.
Lingard and Wakefield (2019) explained that success of project plan is categorized in
four dimensions of dependent on time. First dimension is considered throughout the execution of

9RESEARCH PROPOSAL
project and after completion of this plan like proper budget plan and time scheduling. The
construction work is based on satisfaction rate of the project clients, functional as well as
technical specifications of construction work. After completion of this project work, there is
required to prepare for future. Balashova and Gromova (2017) discussed that commitment of the
project team helped to complete the work by achieving cost as well as time. Weekly project
meetings conducted to meet with materials quality ensure to gain project success. Therefore, the
project manager is responsible to schedule the construction plan properly based on project along
with client requirements.
Hypothesis 2: It is hypothesized that the time factor has positive effects on the project
success.
Figure 1: Conceptual model
Time factor
Cost factor
Critical success
factors Project Success

10RESEARCH PROPOSAL
3. Methodology
3.1 Design and methodology
In order to perform the research study and respond to the research questions as well as
test the provided research hypothesis, research methods are selected. The first step which is taken
into the research study was examining the established critical success factors from the previous
literature work (Alvesson and Sköldberg 2017). The construction project such as Perth Arena is
being analyzed before obtaining set of the project delay factors. In order to conduct this
particular research work, three research methods are selected so that there is proper analysis of
the critical success factors such as time and cost in the construction projects such as:
Qualitative methodology: This research method is being selected to gather non-numerical
data and it only supports the theoretical models related to the selected topic. It is suitable for this
research as it explored to perform team work in the construction project and recognize factors
which are critical to the construction project, its success and project performance (Bresler and
Stake 2017). This selected method is proper for analyzing the first research question. The data
are to be collected by means of interview method where it is analyzed from 5 construction
managers working in Buckeridge Group of Companies. The data which are collected through this
method is contained higher predictive quality; therefore it should base on observations in Perth
Arena Project and experiences of construction managers.
Quasi-experimental design: This research method is chosen for identification of the
variables. It is provided description of the research topic so that the reader can understand as well
as experiments are performed by using survey questionnaires. This selected research method is
appropriate for the last research question related to causes of the delays in project of Perth Arena.

11RESEARCH PROPOSAL
The data are collected by means of primary data collection by using survey questionnaires (Flick
2015). The data are to be examined by means of regression analysis.
Time series method: This method is used to forecast and predict future values based on
the observations in the Perth Arena Construction Project. This method will help to determine
relationship between critical factors as well as project delay factors in Perth Arena Project.
Therefore, this method is suitable for analyzing and collecting information for second research
question. The data are to be collected through descriptive analysis where it included with
statistical analysis for predicting the future values based on current observations. Bell and Jones
(2015) stated that the time series is helpful to forecast future related predictions. The present
presentation of series is compared with history performance of time series. By means of this
particular method, past behavior is being considered and forecasted the future predictions related
to the construction project work in Perth Arena.
From the three selected research methods, it is reviewed that the researcher is necessary
to conduct preliminary data analysis as well as survey study to assemble data associated to the
critical success factors in the construction project. The data are to be reviewed in addition to
analyzed by means of focus group, research observations as well as interview method.
3.2 Details of participants
The selected sample used to analyze selected research topic into the Australian
construction project is consisted numerical as well as non-numerical values suited with the
criteria of research work. Simple random probability sampling method is selected for this work
where no such particular criteria are selected to select the research participants or population
from the employees of the selected construction company. There is some form of random

12RESEARCH PROPOSAL
selection. The interested participants should take part in the survey and interview while no
participants are forced to provide their responses.
Quasi experimental design is helpful for this research study as it assists to lessen time as
well as resources. The results of these particular experiments are required to be genuine as there
is no such artificial research testing (Leatherdale 2019). By means of survey questionnaires, the
employees those are working in Buckeridge Group of Companies are selected. Here, in order to
perform quasi-experimental research, 50 employees are selected.
Qualitative research work is also conducted using interview from 5 construction
managers working in Buckeridge Group of Companies involved in Perth Arena Project. By
means of this particular method, the data is to be collected based on observations and
experiences. Through interview method, the researcher will get responses from the construction
manager with additional details related to the time and cost factors affect the construction project
success (Fletcher 2017). The total sample population for qualitative method is 5.
There is development of questionnaires by means of key factors recognized by the
professionals working into the Buckeridge Group of Companies for providing their own views.
Base on the sample population of quasi-experimental and qualitative research work, the total
sample size considered for this research study is 55. This two techniques or methods allowed the
researcher to analyze collected data received from the participants.
3.3 Description of materials
3.3.1 Survey Questionnaires

13RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Quasi experimental method is used to collect data using survey from 50 employees those
are working in Buckeridge Group of Companies involved in Perth Arena Project. Please refer to
the Appendix 1 to go through the survey questionnaires.
3.3.2 Interview Questions
Qualitative data analysis is performed to collect data using interview from five
construction managers of Buckeridge Group of Companies involved in Perth Arena Project. The
interview questions have been developed to explore the key success factors (See Appendix 1).
3.4 Data analysis
In this research work, both qualitative as well as quantitative data analysis method is
selected. Therefore, mixed data analysis is considered for analyzing the collected data and
getting the research findings. The quantitative data is performed using questionnaires where the
data analysis is provided in form of graphs as well as charts (Long 2016). The result of mixed
data approach is evaluation of the employees to provide responses on critical success factors in
the selected construction project. The analysis method is selected to get numerical data
understand to exhibit graphical plan which can present leanings and triangulations. Regression
analysis is carried out to experiment the research hypothesis using the formula:
The regression model of the hypothesis can be stated as follows:
Dependent variable of hypothesis = A + B* independent variable of hypothesis
Where, A= Intercept of the Model
And B= Relationship between the dependent and independent factors

14RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Mainly, the researcher has selected this data analysis method for highlighting relationship
between dependent as well as independent variables linked with the identified research
hypothesis. ANOVA test is performed to verify validity as well as reliability of collected data
using survey questionnaire method. For each of the research hypothesis, null and alternative
hypothesis are taken. When the value of significant F is less than 0.05, then null hypothesis is
rejected in addition to alternative hypothesis is accepted (Mackey and Gass 2015). The interview
data are to be analyzed in discussion form where for each interview questions, the results from
the responses are to be taken.
3.5 Ethical issues
In processing the research methods, the researcher is tried to maintain code of conduct to
classify accurate set of behaviors required to perform the work. By following the ethical code of
conduct, the researcher helps to add equivalence to the selected topic.
Application of data: The data which are taken for conducting this research work is
assisted to understand the critical success factors in the Perth Arena Project which is critical
towards project success. Commercial application of data is avoided in this case as the data and
information in the research can be limited to academic purpose only.
Consent form: The participants those are involved in the research work should require
providing their details. In this case, they are required to fill up consent form before providing
their responses in the interview and questionnaires. Due to this reason, some participants are not
interested as they are not interested to provide their personal details, which is an ethical issue.
Therefore, identities of the participants are hidden as per their requests.

15RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Involvement of respondents: The researcher is tried not to provide any external pressure
or force the participants to take part in the survey. The respondents those are interested in
providing their responses should participate in the survey. The researcher has ensured that no
metal as well as physical harassment is involved with them while taking their responses. The
details of the respondents are not shared with any third party person. The data collected from
them are kept confidential.
6. Area for further research
This study is focused on effect of critical success factors in the construction projects.
There are few projects which are not accomplished on planned time and estimated budget. In
order to perform further research in the future, there is required for the organization to analyze
strategies on how to guide the construction project in anticipation of it gets success. In this
particular paper, time as well as cost is defined as factors to measure success. In future research,
quality, project scope and technical factors are considered as critical success factors which
provide impact on successful completion of construction projects. Other construction related
projects should be analyzed to determine how those factors cause effect on project completion
work. Identification of factors are key significant as it allowed the construction firms to build
abilities of the contractors to lead project performance in construction industry. It will make
improvement over project success. Identification of the critical success factors will become
helpful for successful management of all kinds of the construction projects. It will assist the
business organization to boost efficiency levels in construction business.
In the future study, the critical success factors should be used for guiding the factors in
order to predict project profitability. The researcher should take those projects where quality,

16RESEARCH PROPOSAL
project scope and technical factors are considered as aspects to get success in the construction
project work. Delays are considered as unpredicted uncertainties through the phase of
construction. Associated risks to the development delays as well as highlighted delay suggestions
should be on success of construction project. The future study will determine to reduce existing
gap into the literature work focusing relationships between critical delays and factors. It will
establish further future local study will reduce claims for the project delays as those can reason
controversial arguments to determine.

17RESEARCH PROPOSAL
References
Alruqi, W.M. and Hallowell, M.R., 2019. Critical success factors for construction safety: review
and meta-analysis of safety leading indicators. Journal of construction engineering and
management, 145(3), p.04019005.
Alvesson, M. and Sköldberg, K., 2017. Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative
research. Sage.
Balashova, E.S. and Gromova, E.A., 2017. Lean construction as an effective organization model
in Arctic. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 117, p. 00011). EDP Sciences.
Bell, A. and Jones, K., 2015. Explaining fixed effects: Random effects modeling of time-series
cross-sectional and panel data. Political Science Research and Methods, 3(1), pp.133-153.
Bhargava, M.G., Vidyullatha, P., Rao, P.V. and Sucharita, V., 2018. A Study on Potential of Big
Visual Data Analytics in Construction Arena. International Journal of Engineering &
Technology, 7(2.7), pp.652-656.
Bresler, L. and Stake, R.E., 2017. Qualitative research methodology in music education.
In Critical Essays in Music Education (pp. 113-128). Routledge.
Caffieri, J.J., Love, P.E., Whyte, A. and Ahiaga-Dagbui, D.D., 2018. Planning for production in
construction: controlling costs in major capital projects. Production Planning & Control, 29(1),
pp.41-50.

18RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Chou, J.S. and Pramudawardhani, D., 2015. Cross-country comparisons of key drivers, critical
success factors and risk allocation for public-private partnership projects. International Journal
of Project Management, 33(5), pp.1136-1150.
Darko, A. and Chan, A.P., 2016. Critical analysis of green building research trend in
construction journals. Habitat International, 57, pp.53-63.
Fletcher, A.J., 2017. Applying critical realism in qualitative research: methodology meets
method. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(2), pp.181-194.
Flick, U., 2015. Introducing research methodology: A beginner's guide to doing a research
project. Sage.
Larsen, J.K., Shen, G.Q., Lindhard, S.M. and Brunoe, T.D., 2015. Factors affecting schedule
delay, cost overrun, and quality level in public construction projects. Journal of Management in
Engineering, 32(1), p.04015032.
Leatherdale, S.T., 2019. Natural experiment methodology for research: a review of how different
methods can support real-world research. International Journal of Social Research
Methodology, 22(1), pp.19-35.
Lingard, H. and Wakefield, R.R., 2019. Integrating Work Health and Safety Into Construction
Project Management. Wiley-Blackwell.
Long, Q., 2016. A novel research methodology for supply network collaboration
management. Information Sciences, 331, pp.67-85.

19RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Love, P.E., Irani, Z., Smith, J., Regan, M. and Liu, J., 2017. Cost performance of public
infrastructure projects: the nemesis and nirvana of change-orders. Production Planning &
Control, 28(13), pp.1081-1092.
Mackey, A. and Gass, S.M., 2015. Second language research: Methodology and design.
Routledge.
Maginn, P.J., 2018. The evolution of urban regeneration in Perth, Western Australia, 1990–
2016. Urban Regeneration in Australia: Policies, Processes and Projects of Contemporary
Urban Change.
Mhatre, T.N., Thakkar, J.J. and Maiti, J., 2017. Modelling critical risk factors for Indian
construction project using interpretive ranking process (IRP) and system dynamics
(SD). International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 34(9), pp.1451-1473.
Nguyen, H.T. and Hadikusumo, B., 2017. Impacts of human resource development on
engineering, procurement, and construction project success. Built Environment Project and Asset
Management, 7(1), pp.73-85.
Raggatt, H., 2017. An architecture of ideas. Architecture Australia, 106(2), p.100.
Todorović, M.L., Petrović, D.Č., Mihić, M.M., Obradović, V.L. and Bushuyev, S.D., 2015.
Project success analysis framework: A knowledge-based approach in project
management. International Journal of Project Management, 33(4), pp.772-783.
Yan, P., Liu, J. and Skitmore, M., 2018. Individual, group, and organizational factors affecting
group bidding decisions for construction projects. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2018.

20RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Zegarra, O. and Alarcón, L.F., 2019. Coordination of teams, meetings, and managerial processes
in construction projects: using a lean and complex adaptive mechanism. Production Planning &
Control, 30(9), pp.736-763.

21RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Appendix 1
Survey questionnaire
Section 1: General information
1. Gender
o Male
o Female
2. Age group
o 25-29 years
o 30-39 years
o 40-49 years
o Above 50 years
3. How long have you been working with the construction industry?
o 1-5 years
o 5-10 years
o 11-20 years
o Above 21 years

22RESEARCH PROPOSAL
4. Please mention your profession
Answer: __________________________________
5. Do you have experience to work in the construction field?
o Yes
o No
Section 2: Analysis of critical success factor of construction projects in Australia, a case
study of Perth Arena Project
1. How far do you agree that in Perth Arena Project, there is proper availability of
resources?
o Strongly disagree
o Disagree
o Neutral
o Agree
o Strongly agree
2. How far do you agree that top management support require achieving project goals?
o Strongly disagree
o Disagree

23RESEARCH PROPOSAL
o Neutral
o Agree
o Strongly agree
3. How far do you agree that client consultation is vital to successful implementation of the
Perth Arena Project?
o Strongly disagree
o Disagree
o Neutral
o Agree
o Strongly agree
4. How far do you agree that inadequate governance provide negative effect on cost
increase?
o Strongly disagree
o Disagree
o Neutral
o Agree
o Strongly agree

24RESEARCH PROPOSAL
5. How far do you agree that workshops are most significant communication method used
in the construction project?
o Strongly disagree
o Disagree
o Neutral
o Agree
o Strongly agree
6. How far do you agree that stakeholder participation carried out in the construction
project to get success?
o Strongly disagree
o Disagree
o Neutral
o Agree
o Strongly agree
7. How far do you agree that regular communication with the top managers is a method of
monitoring and evaluation the Perth Arena Project?
o Strongly disagree
o Disagree

25RESEARCH PROPOSAL
o Neutral
o Agree
o Strongly agree
8. How far do you agree that increase in project budget lead to cause effect on the project
delays?
o Strongly disagree
o Disagree
o Neutral
o Agree
o Strongly agree
9. How far do you agree that cost and time is influencing successful implementation of
Perth Arena Project?
o Strongly disagree
o Disagree
o Neutral
o Agree
o Strongly agree

26RESEARCH PROPOSAL
10. How far do you agree that presentation during the stakeholder meetings help to get
construction project success?
o Strongly disagree
o Disagree
o Neutral
o Agree
o Strongly agree
Interview Questions
1. Do you think that there is higher influence of project team on successful development of Perth
Arena Project?
2. Do you think that top management support required getting success in construction project?
3. Do you think that time and budget provides impact on successful completion of Perth Arena
construction project?