Taxation Law: Fringe Benefit Consequences of Car and CG Consequences for Asset Selling

This article discusses the fringe benefit consequences of a car and the CG consequences for asset selling under taxation law. It covers the methods of calculating fringe benefits tax for a car and the capital gain tax implications for selling assets. The article provides detailed explanations and calculations for both topics.

Running head: TAXATION LAW
TAXATION LAW
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author Note:

1
TAXATION LAW
Answer 1:
The present case study involves the issue of analyzing the Fringe Benefit (FB)
consequences of the Car as per operating cost method as well as statutory formula method1.
The Fringe Benefit Tax is dealt in the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 in
Australia2. FBT is defined as any type of benefit related to an employment and granted by the
employer or associate to an employee or associate in a year at any time out of a bond of mutual
relationship. This is given in section 136(1) of FBTA. Such benefit can comprise any interest,
right, things of value and even things of personal use. The FBT is given in a year. The tax year
usually runs from 1st of April of a particular year to March 31st of the year next. The type 1 class
of benefit forms the fringe benefits over which GST is applicable. For a Financial Year 2019 to
2019, the FBT’s gross rate is 2.0802. The Fringe Tax Benefit for the same financial year is 47
percent.
Sec. 7 is related to FB of cars. It occurs when car is gifted as a benefit to an employee by
an employer to use it privately. There lies two ways for calculating Car Fringe Benefit. One of
the ways is known as statutory formula (SFM) method given in sec. 9(1) in FBTAA. Another is
called the Operating Cost Method given in sec. 10(2) of FBTAA.
In SFM, formula used is simple and can be represented as (0.2 * Car Base Value * day’s
number of the financial year in which CFB is allowed/ total taxable tax)- Recipient’s payment)
The formula, as per Operating Cost Method, can be represented as OC*(100%-B)-RC
1 Hemmings, Philip, and Annamaria Tuske. "Improving Taxes and Transfers in Australia." (2015).
2 The Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986.

2
TAXATION LAW
Where Operating Cost in period of use including fuel, insurance, maintenance and registration as
in sec. 10(3)(a), B= business percentage, RC= contribution made by recipient is a financial year.
The rate of depreciation is 25% as given under sections 11, 12. The imputed interest rate
for the current financial year 2018-19 as given in TR according to section 11 is equal to 5.2
percent. Under TR2011/3, it is given that if an employee made contribution to car’s purchase
price, then the CP of employer will get reduced by sum of contribution of employee. In the given
case study, Lucinda contributed 1000 dollars towards the car cost. The base value or BV of car is
equal to 18000 dollars that will be decreased by1000 dollars as contributed by Employee. BV
now is 17000
Deemed depreciation for car is calculated as follows:
Deemed Depreciation Amount
Car Base Value 18000
Less Employee contribution 1000 TR
2011/3
Base Value 17000
Depreciation rate 25%
Deemed Depreciation
(BV*25%*365)/365 4250
Operating cost method for calculating FBT of car:
OPERATING COST METHOD
Particulars Amount
Repairing Cost of Car 3300
Imputed INTEREST 884

3
TAXATION LAW
Deemed Depreciation 4250
cost incurred for insurance 2200
Fueling cost 990
OPERATING COST total
PRIVATE Usage
KILOMETER run in total 20000
use of car for
WORK
14000
PRIVATE USE of car by employee 6000
PRIVATE USE percentage 30
Taxable value of Fringe Benefit Tax
(TOC*PRIVATE
USE)
3487.2
Imputed interest for car:
Imputed Interest Amoun
t
Car’s Base Value 18000
Less Employee’s contribution 1000 TR
2011/3
Base Value 17000
Statutory rate of Interest 5.20% TD
2018/2
Deemed Interest
(BV*5.2%*365)/
365
884
Statutory Method:
STATUTORY FORMUAL METHOD
Details Amount
Actual Car Base Value 18000
Less Employee’s contribution 1000 TR
2011/3
Base Value adjusted 17000

4
TAXATION LAW
Statutory method rate 20%
Private use 365%
Total Days 365
Taxable value
(BV*20%*(PU/TD) 3400
Thus, from the above calculation, it can be inferred that Statutory Formula Method is
better.
Answer 2:
Section a:
Part 1:
The issue to be discussed here is to make analysis of the CG consequences for asset
selling as per the Income Tax Assessment Act 199734.
Capital gain denotes a statutory income which needs the existence of a CG asset as well
as CG event. One of the most common class of CG event is Capital Gain Event A1 which
happens when disposal of CG asset is done by TP. It is provided in sec. 104-10(1)5. The date of
disposal in a financial year of such CG asset determines whether it is a post CGT asset or not. An
asset disposed before 20 Sep 1985 is not included as CGT asset. Under the rules given in sec.
108-56, a house is included under CGT assets which imply that selling of house will allow a
Capital Gain Event A1. In the decision given in F.C. of T. v McDonald7, it was entrenched that
the Capital Gain Event A1timing is denoted when a CGT asset is received or sold or disposed of.
Capital proceeds (CP) minus Cost Base (CB) gives the Capital Loss (CL) or Capital gain (CG).
3 Woellner, Robin H., et al. Australian taxation law. CCH Australia, 2010.
4 The Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth).
5 The Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth), s. 104-10(1).
6 The Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth), s.185-4.
7 F.C. of T. v McDonald (1987) 18 ATR 957.

5
TAXATION LAW
That is, CP-CB=CG or CL.
CP is the sum of money incurred by selling an asset under sec. 116.208. CP also includes
any amount that can be received in future. Ideally, CB comprises of five elements. This shows
price money received by TP for an asset is mentioned under sec. 110-25(1). The cost price is the
first element. Hence, Element 1 of CB of the house equals to 70000 dollars as per subsec.2 of
110-25. Sum of 15000$ granted to real estate agent forms the element 2 of CB as per sub sec. 3
of 110-25. Thus CB= 85000$. The date of formation of contract appears to be 29th of June’ 19.
Thus, CP is the amount to be received and equals to 865000 dollars. Net capital gain of Ray is
780000 dollars. He is eligible for claiming 50 percent discount as per Division 115. However,
some of the conditions are to be satisfied for this which are individual persons, selling of asset
after 21st of September’ 99 and asset must be held for one year. all these are provided under s
115-10, 115-15 and 115-25. Total CG= 390000 dollars. But as per the facts of the case, Ray
resided in the house for about thirty years; hence it is his residence. So, Capital gain by sale of
house is exempted as per sec. 118-110. So, he is not needed to pay CGT in this year. Since the
events of contract being cancelled and the deposit being retained occurs in the next financial
year, hence they are excluded.
Part 2:
Capital gain denotes a statutory income which needs the existence of a CG asset as well
as CG event. One of the most common class of CG event is Capital Gain Event A1 which
happens when disposal of CG asset is done by TP. It is provided in sec. 104-10(1). The date of
disposal in a financial year of such CG asset determines whether it is a post CGT asset or not. An
asset disposed before 20 Sep 1985 is not included as CGT asset. Under the rules given in sec.
8 The Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth), s. 116.20.

6
TAXATION LAW
108-5, a house is included under CGT assets which imply that selling of house will allow a
Capital Gain Event A1. In the decision given in F.C. of T. v McDonald (1987) 18 ATR 957, it
was entrenched that the Capital Gain Event A1timing is denoted when a CGT asset is received or
sold or disposed of. Capital proceeds (CP) minus Cost Base (CB) gives the Capital Loss (CL) or
Capital gain (CG).
That is, CP-CB=CG or CL.
CP is the sum of money incurred by selling an asset under sec. 116.20. CP also includes
any amount that can be received in future. Ideally, CB comprises of five elements. This shows
price money received by TP for an asset is mentioned under sec. 110-25(1). The cost price is the
first element. It indicates CB’s first element for the painting by Preston is equal to 15000 dollars
according to sec. 110-25 (2). Painting being received before 20.09.1985 forms a CGT asset as it
was not bought before 11.55 pm of 19.09.1985. The CP= 125000 dollars which is incurred by
sale. Here CG= 125000-15000= 110000 dollars. However, some of the conditions are to be
satisfied for this which are individual persons, selling of asset after 21st of September’ 99 and
asset must be held for one year. All these are provided under s 115-10, 115-15 and 115-25.
Hence, CGT=55000 dollars as all criteria are met by Ray.
Part 3:
Capital gain denotes a statutory income which needs the existence of a CG asset as well
as CG event. One of the most common class of CG event is Capital Gain Event A1 which
happens when disposal of CG asset is done by TP. It is provided in sec. 104-10(1). The date of
disposal in a financial year of such CG asset determines whether it is a post CGT asset or not. An
asset disposed before 20 Sep 1985 is not included as CGT asset. Under the rules given in sec.

7
TAXATION LAW
108-5, a house is included under CGT assets which imply that selling of house will allow a
Capital Gain Event A1. In the decision given in F.C. of T. v McDonald (1987) 18 ATR 957, it
was entrenched that the Capital Gain Event A1timing is denoted when a CGT asset is received or
sold or disposed of. Capital proceeds (CP) minus Cost Base (CB) gives the Capital Loss (CL) or
Capital gain (CG).
That is, CP-CB=CG or CL.
CP is the sum of money incurred by selling an asset under sec. 116.20. CP also includes
any amount that can be received in future. Ideally, CB comprises of five elements. This shows
price money received by TP for an asset is mentioned under sec. 110-25(1). The cost price is the
first element. It means element 1 of CB of the yacht is equal to 110000 dollars as per sec. 110-
25(2). CP= 60000 dollars. There is a CL of 50000 dollars. As per sec. 108-20(2), loss of capital
on personal use asset is not taken into account. So, loss must be ignored. CB here is to be
denoted as the Reduced cost base (RCB)
Part 4:
Capital gain denotes a statutory income which needs the existence of a CG asset as well
as CG event. One of the most common class of CG event is Capital Gain Event A1 which
happens when disposal of CG asset is done by TP. It is provided in sec. 104-10(1). The date of
disposal in a financial year of such CG asset determines whether it is a post CGT asset or not. An
asset disposed before 20 Sep 1985 is not included as CGT asset. Under the rules given in sec.
108-5, a house is included under CGT assets which imply that selling of house will allow a
Capital Gain Event A1. In the decision given in F.C. of T. v McDonald (1987) 18 ATR 957, it
was entrenched that the Capital Gain Event A1timing is denoted when a CGT asset is received or

8
TAXATION LAW
sold or disposed of. Capital proceeds (CP) minus Cost Base (CB) gives the Capital Loss (CL) or
Capital gain (CG).
That is, CP-CB=CG or CL.
CP is the sum of money incurred by selling an asset under sec. 116.20. CP also includes
any amount that can be received in future. Ideally, CB comprises of five elements. This shows
price money received by TP for an asset is mentioned under sec. 110-25(1). The cost price is the
first element. It means E1 of CB for shares= 75000 dollars according to sub section 2 of 110-25.
Interest over loan will not be considered here though it forms a not deductable expense as Ray
has a CL. RCB is not including Element 3 of sec. 110-25 (4). Element 3 is the interest. Stamp
duty of 250 dollars is the Element 2. CP here = 80000 dollars. It will be reduced by brokerage
fee of 750 dollars as per sec. 116-30. So, total Capital gain = 75250-79250 = -4000, hence CL. In
addition to this, CL from last year will reduce CG by 10000 dollars.
Ray’s net Capital gain or Capital loss for FY 2018-19:
House=0
Painting=55000
Yacht= 50000 (not considered)
Shares= -4000
Loss of last year= 10000
Total CG = 49000

9
TAXATION LAW
Section b:
In account of the net CG for FY is 2019-19, Ray is to pay IT as it forms a statutory
income. The gain must be assessed in the Ray’s income.
Section c:
In account of the net CL for FY is 2019-19, Ray is eligible to offset the amount in next
FY of 2019-2020 as done for shares. But collectables can offset other collectables. Loss on
personal asset can’t be offset.

10
TAXATION LAW
References:
F.C. of T. v McDonald (1987) 18 ATR 957; 87 ATC 4541
Hemmings, Philip, and Annamaria Tuske. "Improving Taxes and Transfers in Australia." (2015).
The Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986
The Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth)
Woellner, Robin H., et al. Australian taxation law. CCH Australia, 2010