Leadership Styles and Educational Settings

This assignment presents a collection of research articles focusing on various aspects of leadership in educational contexts. The papers delve into topics such as followership, servant leadership, distributed leadership, and the influence of different leadership styles on teaching practices and student outcomes. Analyze these articles to understand the complexities and nuances of leadership within educational environments.

Running Head: EDUCATION LEADERSHIP 1
Education Leadership
Name:
Institution Affiliation:

EDUCATION LEADERSHIP 2
Introduction
Education leadership in learning environment refers to the process of enlisting as well as
guiding the talent along with energies of teachers, learners, together with parents and guardians
toward attaining shared educational objectives. In present times, the theory and practices that
relate to educational leadership have undergone the significant changes. The demands of
educational leadership have remained to be evolving. For an individual to face such challenges
brought about by the evolving world as well as the creation of the transformative changes in
education, it is vital for them to know the task of educational leadership (Bush, 2014). The
purpose of the topic of the “educational leadership” is essential as it presents the best opportunity
to conduct the survey and report on the models and importance of education learning to
education stakeholders. The hidden purpose of educational leadership as the topic of the study is
to show the reason why the society needs to have the appropriate structure of educational
leadership to help in supporting the operations of the learning center that can then leading to
improvement of student and teachers performances. The educational leadership focuses on the
leadership within the learning center right from the early years of children’s center all the way to
university level. The focus on these learning institutions is essential because educational
leadership affects their operations. The educational leadership helps in addressing economic
productivity and development of stakeholders of every individual within the learning centers.
All these purposes are enactable in learning sector by showing how the Educational
leadership must involve the collaboration of different personnel in attaining the set objectives
and goals of a given learning institution towards the advancement of their stakeholders like the
teachers, students, and committee members. The collaboration of educational learning stands for
improving educational methods and results of every operation within the schools. From

EDUCATION LEADERSHIP 3
Kindergarten to senior learning institutions, managers in the organization comprise of tutors,
principals, managers, and chairpersons of departments. Therefore, the primary objective of this
investigative article is to focus on the isssue of education learning as an educational organization
by focusing on some of the hidden purpose of the organization.
Literature review on Educational Leadership and its hidden purpose
According to Seger & Bergsten (2013), educational management came into prevalence in
the days of the twentieth century for various motives. There exist some of the demands created
by institutions for higher points of attainment among students along with many people expected
to learn institutions to advance and restructure their operations. Such prospects from the
communities and education stakeholders were accompaniable by the calls for accountability at
learning levels. Besides, a formation of educational leadership has made the maintenance of
status quo to receive little acceptance. The concept of educational leadership is favorable in
learning institutions because it conveys dynamism as well as proactivity (Baker, 2016). In most
cases, school heads or principals is regularly thought to be the school leader, but educational
leadership may comprise of other individuals like the members of the formal leadership team as
well as other people that contribute towards the objectives of a learning institution.
Hidden purpose of education leadership in learning sector
The hidden purpose in any educational leadership is to improve the management and
operations of learning centers. Besides, through this hidden purpose of leadership, schools have
been able to undergo various changes. In recent times, learning leadership has become familiar
as substitutes for learning administration. Educational management arguably shows just the
limited image of functions of learning centers, ministerial or state education agency. Learning

EDUCATION LEADERSHIP 4
management focuses on interdisciplinary writing work, but it preferably differentiates itself
during the spotlight on pedagogy, epistemology, together with human advancement (Riley &
Ward, 2017). However, in modern science studies, educational leadership borrows its ideas from
political science as well as business. Several theories and perspective that most scholars have
presented and explore consists of instructional leadership, social justice, distributes, and teacher
leadership among other theories. Educational leadership has a hidden purpose that allows
education stakeholders to explore how various actions together with practices can influence the
achievement of students, job satisfaction among teachers, or exploration of other issues or
element that relates to the improvement of the school. Educational leadership has presented the
best platform for the scholars to investigate the best methodology along with the quality of the
primary preparation plans (Berkvens, 2017). Moreover, various nations around the world have
explicit policies that relate to educational leadership. Some of the policies consist of budget and
plans for the training as well as the development of leaders of learning institutions like
Kindergarten, primary, high schools, colleges, and Universities.
Many scholars have suggested that the basic practices that make educational leadership
efficient to include the need of setting directions. The ideas of setting trends within the
educational leadership account for the largest portions that influences of operations of leaders in
learning institutions. The set of practices focuses on helping colleagues in learning sector to
create common understanding concerning the association, its actions, and its objectives
(Malakolunthu et al., 2014). The goals of the schools can undergird the sense of the function of
vision as set by the educational leaders. The approach that focuses on the formation of directions
by educational leadership aid in motivating people by an emphasis on the goals that they find
personally compelling and challenging out achievable ideas. Consequently, having such

EDUCATION LEADERSHIP 5
objectives assist education stakeholders like teachers and learners to make sense of their work.
These directions also enable the stakeholders to find the feeling of identity for themselves within
their working contexts (Jenkins, 2012). Therefore, activities of setting trends in learning sector
by educational leadership often help in identifying specific leadership practices that include
identification and articulation of the school’s vision, fostering the acceptance of goals of groups.
It also aids in the creation of high-performance expectations among the teachers and learners.
The set directions are efficient in monitoring performance of the organization as well as the
promotion of effective interaction all through the institution that aid in the growth of the
common purpose of the learning groups.
Improving and developing changes in learning sector
Educational leaderships have the major hidden function of improving and developing
changes in learning sectors. Besides, educational leadership has the mandate of analyzing
students’ data and observing classes to pinpoint any potential issue along with areas that need
improvements. The leadership also has the responsibilities of building effective teams and
committees that can help in improving and changing structures of organizations. Besides,
educational leadership is responsible for the creation and updating budgets of a given learning
institution (Raffo, 2013). The proper budgeting as set by the leaders helps in ensuring that the
operations of the schools do not decline. The correct update of the budget also supports the
schools in improving the provision of their services in the spirited learning sector. In most cases,
educational leadership is responsible for hiring, evaluating, and assessing policies and
procedures of education in schools and creating improvements that are necessary to ensure that
the committee meets the expectations of the national education body. Therefore, the formation of
educational leadership aid in the process of setting curriculum standards for different schools that

EDUCATION LEADERSHIP 6
they can follow efficiently to improve the performance of students (Black, 2014). The leaders
within education sector work with the motive of reforming education process both on local
people, those in national or state levels. It is necessary for every school to have a committee of
educational leadership to assist its operations in ensuring that it remains competitive and
improving the performance of learners, subordinate staffs, as well as those of teachers.
To accomplish the above responsibilities of educational leadership, it is always
imperative to work as well as have adequate channel communication with other like teachers,
subordinate staffs, and students, along with their facilities. The performance of school mainly
depends on the proper formation of educational leadership and its activeness in ensuring that
they attain every set objective of the school (Vuori, 2017). The benefits of the schools through
the collaborative educational leadership include sharing of findings, concerns, and failures that
stakeholders might find within their operation. Therefore, efficient creation of educational
leadership remains to the stakeholders. It is also essential for every party within the school to
acknowledge and support the functions along with contributions of every education stakeholde
(Brungard et al., 2011). Besides, a real leader in the education system will be capable of creating
the active learning environment where the chances for encouraging alterations are available and
receives support all over the operation of the association. Besides, active learning leadership
creates the variation in developing the process of learning.
Setting directives for stakeholders in learning sector
Premium educational leadership achieves its function by setting directions and through
developing of people. The setting, of course, involves the charting of a clear course that every
party in learning sector understands. Educational leadership also establishes high expectation

EDUCATION LEADERSHIP 7
standards and applying data to track performance and process (Carr et al., 2015). Educational
leadership equips people such as teachers and other learners within the education scheme with an
essential sustainability and education to do well. Moreover, educational leadership has the
objective of creating the schoolwork by guaranteeing that the complete choice of settings
together with incentives for schools to receive support instead of inhibiting teaching and learning
process.
Improving learning and teaching processes
All current reforms effects of education institutions focus on improving learning and
teaching processes. However, there exist vast differences in how leaders go about the changes. In
most cases, some reforms try to develop every learning institution within the country at a given
time. Other changes seek to influence the overall process to learn and teaching within the
learning centers, but only does so one center of learning at a time (Timpau, 2015). Besides, other
educational leadership focuses on the inventive program like the mathematics together with
science. Classically educational leadership addresses a section of the school agenda along with
objective for general implementation, while creative processes to training like supportive
education aiming to alter performances of tutors at a given period (Guthtries & Thompson,
2011). Therefore, educational management can form the highly important function in enhancing
learning process among students.
In cooperation sectors such as different schools, there exists a convincing proof of the
shared center of rehearsals that any thriving managers call on as required. The model that
concerns with the formation of educational leadership focuses on some necessary activities to
improve their operations (Gumbus & Bellibas, 2016). These practices are term by many people

EDUCATION LEADERSHIP 8
to be the essentials flourishing educational management. Often are such exercises efficient for
influential planning to expand the process of learning among students within different schools
significantly. However, exclusive of the necessary activities within the educational leadership,
not much would happen in learning sectors (Reynolds, 2011). Different basics that form the
essential core of successful educational leadership practices include the ideas of setting
directions, developing individuals, as well as redesigning the operations of an organization.
Inspiring management of learning institutions
In most cases, the input of schools most definitely relies on the inspirations along with
capabilities of tutors and managers that collaborate as well as individually. Through educational
leadership, learning institutions can develop extrinsic financial incentives that aim at achieving
school performance targets under different conditions. Educational leadership aids in
establishing schools to be effective organizations that sustain as well as support the performance
of teachers, administrators, along with learners (Luckcock, 2011). Educational leadership leads
to specific practices that typically associated with sets of basics that comprise of strengthening
the culture of schools, modifying the structure of organizations, and developing collaborative
process (Hughes & Panzo, 2015). Such practices help in assuming that the function behind the
redesign of the culture of the organization along with arrangements is to ease the duty of member
so that learning sector and the flexibility of structure need to contest the shifting character of
improvement agents of learning institutions.
Improve effectiveness of learning processes
At every doctoral level, an individual has the option when it approaches their training for
management functions in the learning sector. The kind of the choice of educational leadership by

EDUCATION LEADERSHIP 9
a person or an institution depends on their interests as well as career objectives. Besides, the
doctor of the education process in educational management is tackling particularly towards
educational experts (Klein-Collins & Werthelm, 2013). In learning institutions that focus on
educational leadership, learners concentrate exclusively on management in the perspective of
education and study besides other experts within the education sector that have similar
backgrounds along with perspectives. Moreover, a physician of learning in interdisciplinary
management concentrates on edging for practitioners in every organization such as learning
sector (Timpau, 2015).The interdisciplinary educational leadership allows the classmates to have
a broad range of experience and backgrounds. The experience makes the learners have different
prospects on contests as well as possible strategies for dealing with such problems and eventually
create the richer skill of learning.
Improving learning outcome among learners
Several steps are involved in enacting the issues that arises from education leadeership.
For instance, educational leadership leads to applications of different approaches to improving
the learning process in schools. However, improvement in outcome of a learner depends on their
achievement of the incentives as well as competencies of confined educational management
(Rapp, 2011). According to report by Zhang (2014), any form of development by educational
leadership improves the functions of learning of students unless school management team agrees
with its purposes as well as appreciate what is essential in making it work. Local authorities, for
instance, are always able to assist their counterparts in understanding how the externally initiated
reforms might undergo the process of integration into the efforts of local improvements.
Educational leadership also offers the vital chains for the students whose performances might
shift and have to win the collaboration together with the sustainability of parents along with

EDUCATION LEADERSHIP 10
other people in the local society. Therefore, effective educational leadership is critical to the
development of capacities of students to progress and operations of schools reforms. The
stakeholders have to know how the educational leadership seems to and appreciate the immense
deal concerning how it operates.
Identifying and maintaining the values of learning sector
The greater priority that result from the enaction of education leadership remains to be
ability to motive art that influence and direct people so that they work as a team to achieve the
objectives of learning sector or broader organizations. Therefore, educational leadership provides
the chance to get to display and identify effective communication and interpersonal skills.
Educational leadership begins with identifying and understanding the values of the organization
(Mariana, 2016). Active collaboration of educational leadership in education encompasses team
culture, discipline, communication, resolving conflict, and leadership styles. Other frameworks
of educational leadership include leadership in action, understanding, and managing change,
solving the problem, and making decisions concerning the operations of the learning sector.
Improving ability of managing learning institutions
Educational leadership becomes the second essential issue in learning only to the
instruction of classroom amid every factor that relates to school and adds to what learners study
in every learning center. However, evidence concerning effects of educational leadership on
learning of students can be puzzling to deduce, much of the available surveys underestimate its
influences (Havey & McCrohan, 2017). The straight, as well as implicit things of educational
management on the process of student education in schools, relates concerning the whole quarter
influences of schools. The proof of properties of educational leadership in the education of a

EDUCATION LEADERSHIP 11
student presents the widespread in improving leadership to be fundamental to the winning
execution of the main educational reforms. Additionally, properties of educational leadership are
somewhere along with when they are required most. For instance, at the time when people
imagine of educational leadership in official managerial functions well the better the contest, the
better the influence of their measures on education among students. Bush (2014) reports that
there are small but significant effects of the leadership of educational leadership activities on the
education of students across the band of learning institutions, the present study also demonstrates
that confirmed results of thriving educational management are significantly better in learning
institutions in desperate conditions (Salehzaheh, 2017). Certainly, it is believable that there is no
virtual documentation instance of troubled learning centers being turn around without
intervention through the dominant form of educational leadership. Several other issues may add
to such spin, although educational management is just a means in the process of learning.
Therefore, it is always essential to improve educational leadership among the less performing
learning institutions as the section of their development hard work, or it can form the part of
school reconstitution.
Developing people
Collection of evidence in schools and non-school organizations concerning the
contributions of different practices to effects of leaders is always substantial. Clear as well as
compelling directions of a body contribute significantly to work-related motivations among
members. However, educational leadership is not conditionable to focus on improving
motivations of people in ensuring that every party can improve its performance (Zhang, 2014).
More sets of practices of leadership positively and largely influence the direct experiences of
stakeholders in schools. For instance, educational leadership offers rational inspiration by

EDUCATION LEADERSHIP 12
providing individualized sustainability along with suitable representations of ideal exercise and
attitudes to be vital towards operations of learning institutions.
Continuing educational leadership and their actions are shifting from the margin of higher
learning sectors to the foundation, although there is the need of skilled ongoing education experts
who are always set to walk into the ever-increasing essential functions of leadership. Several
public and private higher learning centers face long-term budget challenges (Luckcock, 2011).
However, educational leadership has made institutional leaders look at their ongoing learning
institutions along with sections to develop different plans as well as actions that aim at increasing
the access, assist learners in accelerating their moment to earn the mark and improve streams of
revenue all through creative strategies. Educational leadership has made institutions leaders be
able to recognize the versatility of progressive education of their leaders to focus on supporting
and advancing institutional objectives in the variety of new along with parallel functions.
Therefore, continuing education of leaders is assuming the responsibility for essential sections
like the international programs together with advancement and increasingly essential duties
within offices of academic affairs (Riley & Ward, 2017). Educational leadership has led to the
development of skills vital to successful ongoing education management that are equally
attractive in some sections of the institution of higher learning.
Conclusion
The purpose of educational leadership has remained as an essential factor in education
because learning institutions currenty operates in complex environments. From this discussion, it
is necessary for the educators to develop the skills of leadership to assist them in directing
organizational change, craft cooperative agreements with different stakeholders within learning

EDUCATION LEADERSHIP 13
sector and navigate challenges at the school, state, local, and federal levels. The idea of
mastering of educational leadership helps education professionals to develop different skills that
are essential, to forge networks across institutions together with political boundaries.from the
above discussion. It is evident that educational leadership prepares educators together with
administrators to become leaders through the combination of relevant coursework along with
experiences of work. The typically different program covered in this context consists of theories
and ethics of leadership, administration, planning, and allocation of resources, along with school-
related issues that build effective educational, cultural competency as well as deepening content
knowledge of people. Through educational leadership, tutors, learners, and school administrators
can find the wealth of opportunities to extend their influence beyond their classroom settings and
schools to their teaching teams, states, districts, schools, and national levels. The ultimate stand
is that the concept of educational leadership is equivalent to ensure the effectiveness in learning
sector and to manage the change and structure of the organization.

EDUCATION LEADERSHIP 14
References
Baker, K. (2016). Women in Educational Leadership Conference Hosts 30th Annual Conference.
Women In Higher Education, 25(12), 1-1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/whe.20378
Berkvens, J. (2017). The Importance of Understanding Culture When Improving Education:
Learning from Cambodia. International Education Studies, 10(9), 161.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n9p161
Black, D. (2014). Confucius on Educational Failure: Three Types of Misguided Students.
Educational Theory, 64(2), 143-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/edth.12054
Brungardt, C. (2011). The Intersection Between Soft Skill Development and Leadership
Education. Journal Of Leadership Education, 10(1), 1-22.
http://dx.doi.org/10.12806/v10/i1/rf1
Bush, T. (2014). Educational leadership and leadership development in Africa. Educational
Management Administration & Leadership, 42(6), 787-791.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1741143214549135
Carr, R., Palmer, S., & Hagel, P. (2015). Active learning: The importance of developing a
comprehensive measure. Active Learning In Higher Education, 16(3), 173-186.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1469787415589529
Gumus, E., & Bellibas, M. (2016). The effects of professional development activities on
principals’ perceived instructional leadership practices: multi-country data analysis using

EDUCATION LEADERSHIP 15
TALIS 2013. Educational Studies, 42(3), 287-301.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1172958
Guthrie, K., & Thompson, S. (2011). Creating Meaningful Environments for Leadership
Education. Journal Of Leadership Education, 9(2), 50-57.
http://dx.doi.org/10.12806/v9/i2/rf4
Harvey, J., & McCrohan, K. (2017). Improving AACSB Assurance of Learning with
Importance-Performance and Learning Growth: A Case Study. Marketing Education
Review, 27(3), 172-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2017.1323554
Hughes, & Panzo. (2015). Developing an Organizational Leadership Graduate Program: A
"CHAT" about Leadership Education. Journal Of Leadership Education, 13(3).
http://dx.doi.org/10.12806/v14/i1/i1
Jenkins, D. (2012). Exploring Signature Pedagogies in Undergraduate Leadership Education.
Journal Of Leadership Education, 11(1), 1-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.12806/v11/i1/rf1
Klein-Collins, R., & Wertheim, J. (2013). Growing Importance of Prior Learning Assessment in
the Degree-Completion Toolkit. New Directions For Adult And Continuing Education,
2013(140), 51-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ace.20073
Luckcock, T. (2011). Spirited Leadership and the Struggle for the Soul of Headteachers:
Differentiating and Balancing Nine Types of Engagement. Educational Management
Administration & Leadership, 38(4), 405-422.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1741143210368302

EDUCATION LEADERSHIP 16
Malakolunthu, S., McBeath, J., & Swaffield, S. (2014). Improving the quality of teaching and
learning through leadership for learning. Educational Management Administration &
Leadership, 42(5), 701-717. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1741143213510510
Mariana, D. (2016). The Importance Of Service Placement And Channellingto Prepare Human
Resources For Students To Meet The Careers Of The Future. JETL (Journal Of
Education, Teaching And Learning), 1(1), 41. http://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jetl.v1i1.34
Raffo, D. (2013). Teaching Followership in Leadership Education. Journal Of Leadership
Education, 12(1), 262-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.12806/v12/i1/262
Rapp, S. (2011). The director of education as a leader of pedagogical issues: a study of
leadership in municipal educational sector activities. School Leadership & Management,
31(5), 471-490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2011.587405
Reynolds, K. (2011). Servant-Leadership as Gender-Integrative Leadership. Journal Of
Leadership Education, 10(2), 155-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.12806/v10/i2/rf8
Riley, J., & Ward, K. (2017). Active Learning, Cooperative Active Learning, and Passive
Learning Methods in an Accounting Information Systems Course. Issues In Accounting
Education, 32(2), 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/iace-51366
Salehzadeh, R. (2017). Which types of leadership styles do followers prefer? A decision tree
approach. International Journal Of Educational Management, 31(7), 865-877.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijem-04-2016-0079

EDUCATION LEADERSHIP 17
Seger, J., & Bergsten, U. (2013). Teaching about Leadership or Teaching through Leadership?.
Journal Of Leadership Education, 12(1), 252-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.12806/v12/i1/252
Timpau, C. (2015). Importance of Self-Directed Learning. Logos Universality Mentality
Education Novelty. Section: SOCIAL SCIENCES, 04(01), 37-49.
http://dx.doi.org/10.18662/lumenss.2015.0401.03
Vuori, J. (2017). Distributed leadership in the construction of a new higher education campus
and community. Educational Management Administration & Leadership,
174114321772532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1741143217725322
Zhang, L. (2014). Book Review: Creative Educational Leadership: A Practical Guide to
Leadership as CreativityCreative Educational Leadership: A Practical Guide to
Leadership as Creativity by TurnbullJacquie. Bloomsbury Publishing, London, 2012, 175
pp., US$39.95, ISBN 9781441167743. Educational Management Administration &
Leadership, 42(1), 159-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1741143213492262