The Essay on Case Scenario of Wasim
Added on 2020-03-16
12 Pages2968 Words139 Views
Running Head: NURSINGNursingName of the StudentName of the University Author Note
1NURSINGIntroduction The essay deals with the case scenario of Wasim, who is in a dilemma regarding the useof stimulants for academic performance as advised by his friends. In response to the case study,the essay aims to address the PICO question developed by Wasim, which is “Do stimulantsincrease academic performance in university students?” Finding evidence to this question willhelp Wasim to make clinical decision. The use of the latest research studies about the problemarea conscientiously, is referred as evidence-based practice. The essay aims to evaluate the twopieces of evidence pertaining to the clinical area and discuss barriers to implement the evidence.PICO model involves the formulation of well-built clinical foreground question. The fourcomponents of the PICO question are - “P (population/problem), I (Intervention), C (comparisonor placebo), and O (Outcome)”. In PICO question developed by Wasim university students arepopulation, the stimulants use is intervention, and the academic performance enhancement is theoutcome measured. These components help to identify specific literature evidence about theeffect of the stimulants (Ahadi & Habicht, 2017). Part A1.Hildt, E., Lieb, K., & Franke, A. G. (2014). Life context of pharmacological academicperformance enhancement among university students–a qualitative approach.BMCmedical ethics,15(1), 23.Authorship
2NURSINGThree authors from different professional backgrounds collaborated in the first qualitativeresearch paper titled “Life context of pharmacological academic performance enhancementamong university students”. The first Author, Elisabeth Hildt, is professor of philosophy anddirector of the Centre for the Study of Ethics in the Professions at Illinois Institute ofTechnology”, where her research focuses on philosophical and ethical issues in neuroscience,most significantly the field of cognitive enhancement. The second Author, known as ProfessorKlaus Lieb, is the Director of the Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy at MainzUniversity. The third author AndreasGünterFranke, works as a trainee in Department forPsychiatry and Psychotherapy at Mainz University (Hildt et al., 2014). Their qualification givesthe confidence that the results are reliable. Moreover, the researchers obtained ethics approvalfor the study from local committee. It can be interpreted that the ethical issues were considered.It is evident that the research is well conducted.AimsThe study aimed at reducing the gap concerning the empirical data related to theenhancement of the academic performance. As there is insufficient literature about contextualfactors of the stimulants use and the associated real world effects on the academic outcomes, theaims and objectives of the study seems justified. As per the literature review conducted by theauthor, it is unclear if the stimulants are used for cognitive and academic performanceenhancement. It is unclear if it can also serve any other purpose. In this context, the author haswell supported the background and rational for the study supporting with relevant literature. Design
3NURSINGThe author has selected qualitative research methodology. For the data collection, face-to-face interview is used as instrument that contains open-ended questions. The interviews arebased on semi-structured interview guidelines. A sample size of 18 people was included. As perinclusion criteria, only participants involved in non-medical use of stimulants for academicperformance improvement were involved. To get better insights of the participants’ opinions,values and perception, open-ended questions in qualitative interview is justified. It will helpunderstand the cause underlying the behaviour. The qualitative study will help generate ideas forimprovement by studying the impact of stimulants in broad context (Mertens, 2014). FindingsAs per the study results, the main reason for administering the stimulants is to increasethe memorising power and cope up with the academic pressure. The results can be interpretedthat the improvement in academic performance due to stimulants is not an isolated performance.The sole target of these smart drugs is not the improvement in cognitive functioning. It is alsointegrated into the multifaceted context of life, which signifies its crucial relevance. In additionto improvement in the studies, the students can better cope with the academic curriculum andbalance it with time off. Thus, it appears to be advantageous for them. It can be concluded thatthe study aims are achieved. Strength and weaknessThe credibility of the research is realised from their details given in the paper thatincludes work experience. Authorship determines the strength of the paper as it ensures that theauthors have expertise to conduct research in this domain (LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, 2017).Thus, there may be no conflicts of interest about the findings considering the expertise,
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.
Related Documents
Evidence Based Practice in Nursing Essaylg...
|11
|2617
|362
Clinical Practice Issue Essaylg...
|10
|2506
|225
Nursing Assignment | Health Case Studylg...
|12
|2674
|129
HLSC122 : Evidence For Practice Nursing Assignmentlg...
|10
|2462
|48
Critical Evaluation of Evidence Essaylg...
|9
|2316
|110
Inquiry in Health Care - Assignmentlg...
|12
|2871
|64