Benefits of Euthanasia: A Debate on Mercy Killing

This essay discusses the benefits of euthanasia and its ethical acceptance. It argues that euthanasia is beneficial in ending the patient's suffering, giving dignity to the person dying, and providing relief to patients suffering from incurable diseases and chronic health symptoms.

Running head: EUTHANASIA
EUTHANASIA
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author note:

1EUTHANASIA
EUTHANASIA
Euthanasia is defined as the process of mercy killing or intentionally culminating
lifespan of a patient to release the soreness and suffering of the patient. Different countries
have different euthanasia laws, which is characterized as intentional euthanasia, unintentional
euthanasia and non-voluntary euthanasia. Euthanasia concept is accepted by few set of people
and completely dejected by few set of people based on individual concept and mind-set. The
major problem faced by this concept is the ethical acceptance of euthanasia. Some patient
itself requests euthanasia sometimes.
The main issue of euthanasia has been in the hub of extremely intense arguments from
past numerous centuries and is bounded by the ethical, spiritual land practical thoughts.
Euthanasia raised a debate regarding the idea of the meaning and value of a person
independent existence. Hence, this essay will argue on the benefits associated with euthanasia
stating the advantages on the approach of euthanasia.
The concept of euthanasia has taken a different turn in Canada; Quebec approved Bill
52, which permits euthanasia. It was effective after 2015, as the government as well as the
doctor’s required time to frame the policies and arrangement in place (Vanessa, 2019). The
bill permitted Quebecers to undergo mercy death if the patient had any incurable critical
illness or at their end stage of life with no hope of betterment or they are constantly suffering
from physical or mental pain, which cannot be cured any further. Doctors should make sure
that the patient is meeting up to the requirements and the patient is aware of the situation with
his consent.
The Supreme Court of Canada is accepting the concept of mercy killing and will
allow doctor-aided demise and euthanasia permissible across Canada but the debate is still
on. The history of this debate in Canada started long back when a Canadian citizen named

2EUTHANASIA
Donald low pleaded the doctor for mercy death and also urged the government to include this
concept for critically ill patient citing the reference from other countries who have established
this concept. The social and political acceptance of euthanasia is still lacking behind because
there are many doctors who are not in the favour of euthanasia and are not ready to accept
this.
Argument 1: Euthanasia is beneficial is that it ends the patient’s suffering:
i. For the people suffering from any terminal diseases, which cannot be furthered, cured
or can be treated like last stage cancer, euthanasia is the best way to relief the person
from continuous pain (Sanchez, 2019).
ii. People who are struggling with an incurable disease of their ailments would happily
die rather than living in pain and suffering (Nicholas, 2018).
iii. Thus, euthanasia puts an end to a patients suffering by ending the constant
psychological and physical pain of the patient (Fragkou & Galanis, 2018).
iv. Counter: However, euthanasia goes in contradiction of the ethics as the criticizers of
euthanasia claims that no doctor or person has the ethical right to end the life of
another person by the act of euthanasia in spite of the good intents (Campbell, 2016).
Argument 2: Another benefit of euthanasia is that it gives a dignity to the person dying and
ensures patient centred care:
i. Followers of euthanasia, state that it is the wish and right of the patient to decide if he
or she wants to live or die in the way they desire if their life is not worth living
(Kumar & Singh, 2018).
ii. With the utmost dignity and any further pain, the patient can choose euthanasia
(Forcen & Jaramillo, 2018).

3EUTHANASIA
iii. With euthanasia, an individual’s dignity and personality is maintained and hence, he
or she can die in peace and be ‘themselves’ without any pain or suffering
(Gonta&Tarabeih, 2018).
iv. Counter: However, suicide, which is a form of euthanasia, has a psychosomatic
result on societies. If the society accept euthanasia as a usual practice, it will influence
people to take up euthanasia to end their life without any major trauma (Johnson,
2017).
Argument 3: Euthanasia is considered as a humane act of mercy killing
i. The advocates of euthanasia claims that it is one of the most appropriate humane act
to release the patient from suffering instead of using any inhumane method like using
guns (Death, 2018).
ii. In the democratic world, each person has the right to live independently, die
independently with his or her own terms, and condition (Sinnott, 2018).
iii. An individual, as well as his or her family, is alleviated from extreme forms of pain,
suffering and trauma hence, resulting in humane treatment (Ballenger, 2018).
iv. Counter: However, this concept of mercy killing is against the oath of the doctors
who are responsible to carry out euthanasia (Donkin, 2017).
Argument 4: Euthanasia ensures adherence to family centred practice of care:
i. The family who are not financially stable to afford so much of money on the patient
who is incurable (Kavehrad, 2018).
ii. Euthanasia provides those families with an alternative solution to free the patient from
that mental burden (Srivastava, 2018).
iii. Hospitals charge huge amount of money for treating a patient who is critically ill even
after the patient has no scope of betterment (Havill et al., 2018).

4EUTHANASIA
iv. Counter: However, in some cases doctors provides the patient with a false opinion,
which effects the mental condition of the patient and he or she opts for euthanasia.
Hence, in such cases patient loses his or her life based on a false report (Goligher et
al., 2017).
Argument 5: Euthanasia ensures prevention of financial losses and constraints in the
concerned healthcare organizations:
i. Euthanasia frees up the space, funds and the equipment of the hospital (Mani,
Simha&Gursahani, 2018).
ii. Patient suffering from irreversible coma requires huge amount of fund and space with
all calibrated equipment available with a very less chance of survival (German, 2019).
iii. Hence, euthanasia benefits such patients from not utilizing these resources for years
and peacefully dying (Best, 2019).
iv. Counter: However, these ideas of saving resources could increase the corruption in
the hospitals and prompt the authorities to give euthanasia for saving money by
mentally burdening the patient (Zenz, Tryba & Zenz, 2015).
Argument 6: Euthanasia provides relief to patients suffering from incurable disease and
chronic health symptoms:
i. The major benefit of euthanasia is that its releases the burdened life of paralysed and
brain-dead people who are constantly suffering and are considered as almost half dead
with no response to any stimuli (Kontaxaki et al., 2018).
ii. Hence, it helps the patient with bad quality of life to die according to their wish and
command (Quill &Battin, 2018).
iii. The patient can itself decide the time and the day when he or she wants euthanasia
nobody can force him or her (Wilson, 2018).

5EUTHANASIA
iv. Counter: However, in such medical condition the patient cannot make any rational
decision and tend to die with no hope of betterment and give up hopes very easily,
disturbing their ability to think (Porter & Warburton, 2018).
In this essay, it was clearly demonstrated that euthanasia has many benefits to make it
legal and authorized all over the world but also has equal number of cons, which leads to
debate between cultures, doctors and people of different society.

6EUTHANASIA
References:
Ballenger, J. (2018). Living in Death's Shadow: Family Experiences of Terminal Care and
Irreplaceable Loss by Emily K. Abel. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 92(3), 566-
567.
Best, M. (2019). Dignity in Palliative Care. Textbook of Palliative Care, 1-11.
Campbell, D. (2016). Real control over death: A critical evaluation of the voluntary
euthanasia debate. Australian Rationalist, The, 101, 31.
Death, T. V. P. A. (2018, August). LEGAL FRAMEWORKS. In Physician-Assisted Death:
Scanning the Landscape: Proceedings of a Workshop. National Academies Press.
Donkin, A. (2017). Human dignity and the future of the voluntary active euthanasia debate in
South Africa. SAMJ: South African Medical Journal, 107(8), 647-647.
Forcén, F. E., & Jaramillo, J. R. (2018). The Darkness at the End of Life: Suicide in Palliative
Care Settings. In Suicide Prevention (pp. 191-202). Springer, Cham.
Fragkou, D., &Galanis, P. (2018). Ethical issues related to euthanasia and physician assisted
suicide. ARCHIVES OF HELLENIC MEDICINE, 35(6), 834-841.
Germán, R. Z. (2019). Social Aspects of Euthanasia. Cuadernos de bioetica: revistaoficial de
la Asociacion Espanola de Bioetica y EticaMedica, 30(98), 23-34.
Goligher, E. C., Ely, E. W., Sulmasy, D. P., Bakker, J., Raphael, J., Volandes, A. E., ... &
White, D. B. (2017). Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia in the Intensive Care
Unit: A Dialogue on Core Ethical Issues. Critical care medicine, 45(2), 149.
GONŢA, V., & TARABEIH, M. (2018). Euthanasia-the Right to a Dignified Death.

7EUTHANASIA
Havill, J., Davidson, J., Sparrow, M., Stephens, R., Smales, L., Johnson, L., ...&Kueppers, F.
(2018). Enough doctors support the End of Life Choice Bill to make it operable. The
New Zealand Medical Journal (Online), 131(1479), 88-90.
Johnson, C. (2017). Euthanasia debate important, vexed and difficult. Australian
Medicine, 29(21), 9.
Kavehrad, C. (2018). Criteria for Active Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide.
Kontaxaki, M. I., Paplos, K., Dasopoulou, M., &Kontaxakis, V. (2018). Psychiatry trainees'
attitudes towards euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Psychiatrike=
Psychiatriki, 29(1), 74-78.
Kumar, N., & Singh, A. P. (2018). Favouring a Dignified End to Human Life: Common
Cause v. Union of India. Journal of National Law University Delhi, 5(1), 109-115.
Mani, R. K., Simha, S. N., &Gursahani, R. (2018). The advance directives and foregoing of
life support: Where do we stand now?.Indian journal of critical care medicine: peer-
reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 22(3), 135.
Nicholas, K. (2018). MEASURING MERCY: PROTECTING PATIENT DISCRETION IN
TERMINAL CARE UNDER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT. National
Lawyers Guild Review, 75(2), 100-127.
Porter, K., & Warburton, K. G. (2018). Physicians' views on current legislation around
euthanasia and assisted suicide: Results of surveys commissioned by the Royal
College of Physicians. Future Hospital Journal, 5(1), 30-34.
Quill, T. E., &Battin, M. P. (2018). Physician-assisted dying: Understanding, evaluating, and
responding to requests for medical aid in dying.

8EUTHANASIA
Sánchez, I. C. (2019). The Value and Dignity of Terminal Life. Philosophical Prolegomena
for a Critique of Euthanasia. Cuadernos de bioetica: revistaoficial de la Asociacion
Espanola de Bioetica y EticaMedica, 30(98), 43-53.
Sinnott, G. M. (2018). Euthanasia: A Form of Newgenics? 2018 NCUR.
Srivastava, P. K. (2018). Right to Live with Dignity. Journal of Constitutional Law and
Jurisprudence, 1(1), 25-31.
Wilson, K. G. (2018). Psychological aspects of medical assistance in dying: A personal
reflection. Canadian Psychology/psychologiecanadienne, 59(2), 132.
Zenz, J., Tryba, M., & Zenz, M. (2015). Palliative care professionals’ willingness to perform
euthanasia or physician assisted suicide. BMC palliative care, 14(1), 60.

9EUTHANASIA
Bibliography
Bbc.co.uk. (2019). BBC - Ethics - Euthanasia: Pro-euthanasia arguments. Retrieved from
http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/euthanasia/infavour/infavour_1.shtml
Flowpsychology.com. (2019). 7 Important Euthanasia Pros and Cons | Flow Psychology.
Retrieved from https://flowpsychology.com/7-important-euthanasia-pros-and-cons/
Getrevising.co.uk, R. (2019). Argument For Euthanasia. Retrieved from
https://getrevising.co.uk/grids/argument_for_euthanasia
Vanessa Milne, J. (2019). Medical assistance in dying: should it be legal or banned in
Canada? Retrieved from https://healthydebate.ca/2014/08/newsletter/euthanasia-
assisted-death