Skills and Qualities for Literature Review in Health and Social Care

This document discusses the skills and qualities required to conduct a literature review in health and social care. It covers research skills, written skills, ICT skills, critical thinking skills, and time management skills. The document also explores the ways in which literature reviews influence evidence-based practice in the field.

EVIDENCE BASED
RESEARCH

P2. Explain the skills and qualities needed to conduct a literature review in health and
social care
Some of the better literature review research skills includes; research skills, written skills, ICT
skills, critical thinking skills and time management skills. These skills have been explained
below:
Research skills: Research skills are our ability to find the answer to a question or find the answer
to a problem. Analytical capabilities include the ability to collect data on the subject, to analyze
that data, and to analyze and validate the data in a way that responds to us.
Written skills: A literary reporter has to invest a lot of energy turning his ideas on various works
into presentations and documents, so the best majors are people who have strong writing abilities
and are not also in danger from writing suggestions (Chiappelli, 2014).
ICT Skills: This skills related to surfing and browsing on desktop; in this skill researcher could
find out the valuable keyword which can take him to required information on internet. At this
time, internet is flooded with lots of information but through this technique; researcher could
easily get to their information in minimum time (Chiappelli, 2014).
Critical thinking skills: Being a writing analyst means you have the ability to consider everything
you read and write. You should be able to look at work from all angles and consider which one is
the most important. At that point, you need to articulate these reflections well.
Time management skills: Because the analyst needs to invest so much energy reading,
composing, and communicating your ideas and thoughts in the classroom, the writing majors
have more time better for action skills than keeping track of everything. This includes knowing
when and where you work best nearby and being happy to invest a little extra energy in the
library to make sure you understand the material (even at the end of the week).
Qualities requires:
1. There should be strong evidence of analytical thinking shown through the connections you
make between the literature being reviewed.

2. A good Literature Review is not simply a list describing or summarizing several articles, a
literature review is discursive prose which proceeds to a conclusion by reason or argument
3. It strike a balance between sources supporting and opposing a particular aspect or particular
subject of subject
4. Should be wide enough to cover or provide enough information required on the subject
P7 Describe different ways in which the literature review influences evidence-based health
and social care practice
Literature reviews involves answering centralized questions to: clarify experts and patients about
the best diagnosis accessible when deciding on medical care options; impact strategy; and
identify future research needs.
Knowledge creation within corporate research is accelerating at great speeds while remaining
shared and interdisciplinary. This makes it difficult to be aware that you are at the forefront and
at the forefront of the study, just to gauge overall validity in a particular area of business
analysis. This is why studying writing as a study method is more suitable than any other time as
a recent reminder. Routine writing reviews regularly require thoroughness and depth and are
conducted quickly, rather than following a specific technique (Prasad, 2013). As a result,
questions may be raised about the quality and reliability of these types of studies.
In several areas, strategy and practice developments continue on a limited test basis.
Controversial points affecting large volumes of studies include: adequately designed and overly
involved studies; inconsistency and vulnerability in the estimation of results; ignoring the views
of people with dementia and friends; and the inability to understand the intricacies of living with
depression and the types of media multitasking that should help with success and success. The
gaps in existing evidence base shift both towards experts seeking guidance on how to best plan
and implement evidence-based management to inform people who are living with dementia in
the network and assist their carers and those who are accused of evaluating administrations
(Brockopp and Hastings-Tolsma, 2003).
One of the added benefits of doing the writing survey is that it can quickly find out which experts
have done the most on a particular topic and, after all, perhaps the experts on the point. Someone

who has done twenty articles on one point or related topics is probably more educated than
someone who has done a solo article. This similar author is likely to appear as a source of insight
in a large number of different articles made on a similar point. From the number of articles
written by the writer and the times on which the essay was submitted by different writers, an
analyst will have the opportunity to assume that the particular writer is an expert in the area and,
as a result. , a particular benefit for discussion in the study of the flow to be included.
Although much non-judgmental information on coordinated thinking has been developed, it is
expected that there will be a better understanding of the components that guide behavioral
measures, dynamics, collaboration, and governance in rooted networks of thought. To gain an
understanding of these points and to gain a coordinated understanding in more depth, many basic
assumptions of thought that have been generated have been developed and identified in this
study. An orderly writing survey helps identify the basic estimates of coordinated thinking.
Quality Assurance has been used as a hypothesis system for analysis.
A writing survey may only include a summary of key sources, but in sociology, a writing survey
is usually an authoritative example and combines both a summary and a summary. mixture, often
within a clearly marked classification. A summary is a repetition of the important data from the
source, but a recap, or rearrangement, is a combination of that data in a way that teaches how
you want a case study to be conducted. she studies.
P8 Explain how recent research has had a positive impact on current practice to improve
service delivery
Recent research has positive impact on current practice by providing essential information
necessary to take decision related to improve service delivery. Recent research can be used as
references to avoid failures while doing experiments. For instance, if in past some experiments
has failed and the reason is mentioned in research than practitioners can avoid such mistake and
can give quick result through eliminating extra time consume on failure (LoBiondo-Wood and
Haber, 2017).
Recent research helped current practitioners by improving service in delivering quality care to
clients in better way.

The development and availability of standards for patient well-being can meet some needs. They
can implement minimum levels of achievement or they can set consistency or consistency
between different people and societies. Another reason for the guidance is that they set a desire.
The road to creating leadership can create a desire for societies and wellness experts influenced
by principles. The distribution and distribution of the guidance also helps to define the desires of
buyers and sellers (LoBiondo-Wood and Haber, 2017).
Employability skills are fundamental in the current era of mechanical disturbance and
globalization. Businesses are complaining about the lack of staff capacity. Research trains these
producers by supporting them with sensitive or complex knowledge and competency skills
relevant to the world in order to be profitable and ready for use by the company.
Recent research also helps in identifying development needs of own professional skills and
identifies the gap between available skills and required knowledge in particular field. It supports
in list down essential skills and qualities requires by practitioners to fulfill assign role in the
hospitality industry.
Evidenced based research provides some solutions looking by practitioners while they are stuck
into cases which they don’t understand about the causes. Experimenting medicines directly on
client could result into unpredictable dangerous outcomes in the form of even death of the
patient. In such situation, already applied evidenced based research gives confidence to these
curers to implement their solution to give direct benefit to clients.

Conclusion
After analyzing whole report, it can be concluded that; Research-based evidence can contribute
to practices that have a significant impact on the lives of groups of people. A literature review
provides an overview of previous research on a topic that critically evaluates, organizes, and
analyzes what has been shared on a particular topic. It allows the creator to bring in and stage the
visual analysis and visual writing relevant to the point. It helps to map the different ways of
handling a particular application and finding projects. It will be the foundation for the creator's
research and confirm the importance of the new study.

References
Brockopp, D.Y. and Hastings-Tolsma, M.T., 2003. Fundamentals of nursing research. Jones &
Bartlett Learning.
Chiappelli, F., 2014. Fundamentals of evidence-based health care and translational
science (Vol. 18). Heidelberg: Springer.
LoBiondo-Wood, G. and Haber, J., 2017. Nursing research-e-book: methods and critical
appraisal for evidence-based practice. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Prasad, K., 2013. Fundamentals of evidence based medicine. New York: Springer.