Market Research on the iPhone X
VerifiedAdded on 2023/06/11
|7
|2660
|482
AI Summary
This market research report analyzes Apple's strategies, corporate social responsibility, stakeholder analysis, monitoring process, and contingency plan for the iPhone X. It discusses how Apple attracted customers with exclusivity and magnetism pricing, and how it can improve its CSR efforts for employees in the supply chain. The report also covers the importance of monitoring and risk assessment, and the resources required for a successful product launch.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Market Research on the iPhone X
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Contents
1. INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................3
2. STRATEGIES....................................................................................................................3
2.1 Apple’s strategy to attract customers...............................................................................3
2.2 Apple is the firm for fixing and appealing price..............................................................3
3. APPLE AS STAKEHOLDER............................................................................................4
3.1 Customer..........................................................................................................................4
3.2 Employees of Apple.........................................................................................................4
3.3 Investors...........................................................................................................................4
3.4 Dealers and the Distributors.............................................................................................4
4. APPLE’S CORPORATE PUBLIC RESPONSIBILITIES PERFORMANCE..................4
5. MONITORING PROCESS................................................................................................5
5.1 Monitoring as priority......................................................................................................5
5.2 Main issues focused.........................................................................................................5
5.3 Knowledge of Warning sign............................................................................................5
5.4 Communicate progress.....................................................................................................5
5.5 Risk Assessment...............................................................................................................5
5.6 Identify the risks...............................................................................................................5
5.7 Prioritizing risks...............................................................................................................5
6. CONTINGENCY PLAN....................................................................................................5
7. RESOURCE REQUIRED..................................................................................................6
CONCLUSION..........................................................................................................................6
REFERENCES...........................................................................................................................7
1. INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................3
2. STRATEGIES....................................................................................................................3
2.1 Apple’s strategy to attract customers...............................................................................3
2.2 Apple is the firm for fixing and appealing price..............................................................3
3. APPLE AS STAKEHOLDER............................................................................................4
3.1 Customer..........................................................................................................................4
3.2 Employees of Apple.........................................................................................................4
3.3 Investors...........................................................................................................................4
3.4 Dealers and the Distributors.............................................................................................4
4. APPLE’S CORPORATE PUBLIC RESPONSIBILITIES PERFORMANCE..................4
5. MONITORING PROCESS................................................................................................5
5.1 Monitoring as priority......................................................................................................5
5.2 Main issues focused.........................................................................................................5
5.3 Knowledge of Warning sign............................................................................................5
5.4 Communicate progress.....................................................................................................5
5.5 Risk Assessment...............................................................................................................5
5.6 Identify the risks...............................................................................................................5
5.7 Prioritizing risks...............................................................................................................5
6. CONTINGENCY PLAN....................................................................................................5
7. RESOURCE REQUIRED..................................................................................................6
CONCLUSION..........................................................................................................................6
REFERENCES...........................................................................................................................7
1. INTRODUCTION
iPhone X made a revolution in the smartphone industry. Apple was busy selling the iPhone X
to customers as they are selling a portion of jewellery which is actually a piece of technology.
The look of the smartphone is more appreciable than battery life and speed, and that approach
has driven Apple Watch to develop the bestselling watch ever. At its yearly launch occasion
in September, Apple proclaimed the iPhone X device (which was available for pre-order).
From a selling price viewpoint, a base 64 GB iPhone X model was priced at $999 and $1,149
for 256GB model.
Apple implemented supply chain management to increase the selling of iPhone X. It
invigorated lines at the Apple stores. It provided some small fraction hands-on access earlier
traditional outlets. And maybe the utmost un-Apple change of all period, it gathered the most
shining comments (Giachetti, 2018).
2. STRATEGIES
2.1 Apple’s strategy to attract customers
The X known as for the limited in iPhone. The impression of an exclusiveness is within
customers mind. The greatest expressively influential knowledges were utilized in labelling.
Similarly, Apple’s having set of new products comportments the word “i” as the prefix
appeared, that may have appeared bizarre and the new perhaps also upcoming system to the
traditional “e” prefix instead of this its meanings from the “internet” to the word as pronoun
“I” was have originated as to appear in “compulsive extra with their iPhone devices”.
If the Apple’s iPhone X will not turn out a bit, because its identification is assured to support
which act as the brand name at an insensible level. In a book Fraser Sutterland and Steve
Rivkin wrote that demonstrated a brand with positive tough in agreement with resonances
like “p,” “k,” and “t” have improved recollection Apple have the more memorable brand as
compared with other. Earlier, Apple’s iPhone X announced as iPhone “10,” Warren also
renowned in Verge post, it is impartially unavoidable that some people will said “iPhone X,”
as word “ehks,” suggesting this as the recollection effect.
2.2 Apple is the firm for fixing and appealing price
However, the price known to the customers was $999 was fundamentally costly as $1,000.
The established publicising technique of the rotary despondent the price in that manner which
known as “magnetism costing” is still effect customer which is extra than purchaser may
catch.
Correspondingly, the performance of inaugural the $999 Apple’s iPhone X organised with
cheap substitutes both brands the iPhone 8 Plus with the price of $799 looked seems as cheap
product and made iPhone X appeared as more similar a treat. This conclusive move,
“fastener” has been effective for the Apple product to respectively timing to carry out all
fresh products for the customers. Like the other products of Apple, the latest iPhones might
have an integral end date. The customer observed that as quickly as customer phone started to
deliberate down or fault, in the year 2017, there was a new model parched from on the
complete market alluring customer to the advancement. This type of the cases may not be as
ample of an accident as the customer contemplate. Further, Identical influential technological
companies like Apple, Apple has been suspected of somewhat Known as “planned
obsolescence” was happened once corporations calculatingly prepare products that was not
former if they might give customers a purpose to purchase innovative phone (Mullin et al.
2017).
iPhone X made a revolution in the smartphone industry. Apple was busy selling the iPhone X
to customers as they are selling a portion of jewellery which is actually a piece of technology.
The look of the smartphone is more appreciable than battery life and speed, and that approach
has driven Apple Watch to develop the bestselling watch ever. At its yearly launch occasion
in September, Apple proclaimed the iPhone X device (which was available for pre-order).
From a selling price viewpoint, a base 64 GB iPhone X model was priced at $999 and $1,149
for 256GB model.
Apple implemented supply chain management to increase the selling of iPhone X. It
invigorated lines at the Apple stores. It provided some small fraction hands-on access earlier
traditional outlets. And maybe the utmost un-Apple change of all period, it gathered the most
shining comments (Giachetti, 2018).
2. STRATEGIES
2.1 Apple’s strategy to attract customers
The X known as for the limited in iPhone. The impression of an exclusiveness is within
customers mind. The greatest expressively influential knowledges were utilized in labelling.
Similarly, Apple’s having set of new products comportments the word “i” as the prefix
appeared, that may have appeared bizarre and the new perhaps also upcoming system to the
traditional “e” prefix instead of this its meanings from the “internet” to the word as pronoun
“I” was have originated as to appear in “compulsive extra with their iPhone devices”.
If the Apple’s iPhone X will not turn out a bit, because its identification is assured to support
which act as the brand name at an insensible level. In a book Fraser Sutterland and Steve
Rivkin wrote that demonstrated a brand with positive tough in agreement with resonances
like “p,” “k,” and “t” have improved recollection Apple have the more memorable brand as
compared with other. Earlier, Apple’s iPhone X announced as iPhone “10,” Warren also
renowned in Verge post, it is impartially unavoidable that some people will said “iPhone X,”
as word “ehks,” suggesting this as the recollection effect.
2.2 Apple is the firm for fixing and appealing price
However, the price known to the customers was $999 was fundamentally costly as $1,000.
The established publicising technique of the rotary despondent the price in that manner which
known as “magnetism costing” is still effect customer which is extra than purchaser may
catch.
Correspondingly, the performance of inaugural the $999 Apple’s iPhone X organised with
cheap substitutes both brands the iPhone 8 Plus with the price of $799 looked seems as cheap
product and made iPhone X appeared as more similar a treat. This conclusive move,
“fastener” has been effective for the Apple product to respectively timing to carry out all
fresh products for the customers. Like the other products of Apple, the latest iPhones might
have an integral end date. The customer observed that as quickly as customer phone started to
deliberate down or fault, in the year 2017, there was a new model parched from on the
complete market alluring customer to the advancement. This type of the cases may not be as
ample of an accident as the customer contemplate. Further, Identical influential technological
companies like Apple, Apple has been suspected of somewhat Known as “planned
obsolescence” was happened once corporations calculatingly prepare products that was not
former if they might give customers a purpose to purchase innovative phone (Mullin et al.
2017).
3. APPLE AS STAKEHOLDER
Apple reflects the welfares and apprehensions of numerous key investors in Apple firm
strategies and agendas for business social accountability. Investor collections execute
adjustable requirement in various features of the business (Demir, 2015). Whereas, in
particular Apple’s case the following subsequent stakeholders are important:
i. Customers
ii. Employees of Apple
iii. Investor
iv. Dealers and the Distributors
3.1 Customer.
Apple phone arranges clients as their top investors in planning corporate social responsibility
(CSR) policies. This stakeholder assemblage is consisting of separate and structural
purchasers of Apple’s products. The foremost attention of the customers was to actual and
effective products which are practically priced. Apple’s products have the higher price
opinions.
3.2 Employees of Apple.
Employees are always the secondary-priority of stakeholders in the Apple’s method to trade
public concern. Stakeholder group in Apple is constituting of employees or staffs at Apple’s
services. The major welfares of these stakeholders are appropriate recompense and its career
growth. Employees as the stakeholder group is significant because they unswervingly
regulate human resource competences to modernise and advance money-making products
(Baudry et al., 2017).
3.3 Investors.
Investors are naturally foremost stakeholders and determining factor of a company social
responsibility agendas in productions. The stakeholders of Apple are concerned about
exploiting the revenues on their savings. The business efficiently reports this investor group
over the complete excellent monetary presentation. For instance, Apple is nowadays one of
the furthermost profitable firms in the world.
3.4 Dealers and the Distributors.
Workforces in Apple’s supply chain management strategy are too important thoughts in the
company business social accountability exertions. These labours are indirect investors in
Apple’s professional but control the firm’s business social tasks. The foremost interest of this
investor group is like the benefits of Apple’s personal staffs such as appropriate recompense
and job safety. Also, this group of stakeholders is concerned with the moral service practices.
Apple has a Dealer Code of Conduct. The business executes supplies on the service practices
of organisations in companies supply chain management (Banks, 2016).
4. APPLE’S CORPORATE PUBLIC RESPONSIBILITIES PERFORMANCE
Apple has the significantly high performance in its CSR by sustaining the welfares of
stakeholders. The firm contends the benefits for customers, Apple staffs, and stockholders.
However, Apple can improve its CSR act in the benefits of the employees of the organization
in supply chain management strategies (Russell, 2016). Striking rulebooks on dealers is
Apple reflects the welfares and apprehensions of numerous key investors in Apple firm
strategies and agendas for business social accountability. Investor collections execute
adjustable requirement in various features of the business (Demir, 2015). Whereas, in
particular Apple’s case the following subsequent stakeholders are important:
i. Customers
ii. Employees of Apple
iii. Investor
iv. Dealers and the Distributors
3.1 Customer.
Apple phone arranges clients as their top investors in planning corporate social responsibility
(CSR) policies. This stakeholder assemblage is consisting of separate and structural
purchasers of Apple’s products. The foremost attention of the customers was to actual and
effective products which are practically priced. Apple’s products have the higher price
opinions.
3.2 Employees of Apple.
Employees are always the secondary-priority of stakeholders in the Apple’s method to trade
public concern. Stakeholder group in Apple is constituting of employees or staffs at Apple’s
services. The major welfares of these stakeholders are appropriate recompense and its career
growth. Employees as the stakeholder group is significant because they unswervingly
regulate human resource competences to modernise and advance money-making products
(Baudry et al., 2017).
3.3 Investors.
Investors are naturally foremost stakeholders and determining factor of a company social
responsibility agendas in productions. The stakeholders of Apple are concerned about
exploiting the revenues on their savings. The business efficiently reports this investor group
over the complete excellent monetary presentation. For instance, Apple is nowadays one of
the furthermost profitable firms in the world.
3.4 Dealers and the Distributors.
Workforces in Apple’s supply chain management strategy are too important thoughts in the
company business social accountability exertions. These labours are indirect investors in
Apple’s professional but control the firm’s business social tasks. The foremost interest of this
investor group is like the benefits of Apple’s personal staffs such as appropriate recompense
and job safety. Also, this group of stakeholders is concerned with the moral service practices.
Apple has a Dealer Code of Conduct. The business executes supplies on the service practices
of organisations in companies supply chain management (Banks, 2016).
4. APPLE’S CORPORATE PUBLIC RESPONSIBILITIES PERFORMANCE
Apple has the significantly high performance in its CSR by sustaining the welfares of
stakeholders. The firm contends the benefits for customers, Apple staffs, and stockholders.
However, Apple can improve its CSR act in the benefits of the employees of the organization
in supply chain management strategies (Russell, 2016). Striking rulebooks on dealers is
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
problematic considering changes in administrative context. Though, Apple has completed
authority to induce dealers to fulfil with its Dealer Code of Conduct. Therefore, the firm’s
main CSE effort must rally on the overall obedience in Apple’s iPhone X supply chain
strategies (Son et al., 2015
5. MONITORING PROCESS
5.1 Monitoring as priority
If things are not according to plan or they are going off course, purchaser essential to know
about it as quickly as possible so that purchaser can select any essential action. It always has
been a good idea to spot budget intensive care as a top importance item on the suitable team
consultation agenda.
5.2 Main issues focused
At economical monitoring meetings to the highpoints and immense issues. Customer may
need to recognise smaller budget matters that are happening according to strategy, but
customer don’t have necessity to deliberate them. Use customer time to think on the
significant issues.
5.3 Knowledge of Warning sign
Take suitable counteractive action, if customer budget does of the course, do not leave
remedial action till it will too late to pursue anything. All things must be going well,
purchaser shouldn’t be astonished by whatever on customer budget report they get
(Kotamarthi, 2015).
5.4 Communicate progress
The decent and the wicked the progress is, it can be inspiring for customer side or section to
hear decent news, e.g. that the customer are 20% in advance of budget for the quarter.
5.5 Risk Assessment
All business-critical operations are must be addressed in a well-organized manner. A decent
plan classifies all critical commercial functions, and it plans ways to curtail losses.
5.6 Identify the risks
A Risk Analysis has been always conducted by the Apple to avoid the risk and to classify the
numerous risks that customer commercial firms may face.
5.7 Prioritizing risks
Too much planning is sometime by the customer can make them confuse to select a product it
is the one of the biggest challenges of possibility planning is make sure that the customer do
not plan too much (Zapico, 2017).
6. CONTINGENCY PLAN
Following are the key steps that has been incorporated by Apple for the contingency plan and
maintaining a process:
i. Connect the plan to everybody in the firms.
ii. Notify all employee their parts and everyday jobs connected to the plan.
iii. Deliver essential exercise for persons to fulfil these parts and everyday jobs.
iv. Conduct tragedy drills where applied.
authority to induce dealers to fulfil with its Dealer Code of Conduct. Therefore, the firm’s
main CSE effort must rally on the overall obedience in Apple’s iPhone X supply chain
strategies (Son et al., 2015
5. MONITORING PROCESS
5.1 Monitoring as priority
If things are not according to plan or they are going off course, purchaser essential to know
about it as quickly as possible so that purchaser can select any essential action. It always has
been a good idea to spot budget intensive care as a top importance item on the suitable team
consultation agenda.
5.2 Main issues focused
At economical monitoring meetings to the highpoints and immense issues. Customer may
need to recognise smaller budget matters that are happening according to strategy, but
customer don’t have necessity to deliberate them. Use customer time to think on the
significant issues.
5.3 Knowledge of Warning sign
Take suitable counteractive action, if customer budget does of the course, do not leave
remedial action till it will too late to pursue anything. All things must be going well,
purchaser shouldn’t be astonished by whatever on customer budget report they get
(Kotamarthi, 2015).
5.4 Communicate progress
The decent and the wicked the progress is, it can be inspiring for customer side or section to
hear decent news, e.g. that the customer are 20% in advance of budget for the quarter.
5.5 Risk Assessment
All business-critical operations are must be addressed in a well-organized manner. A decent
plan classifies all critical commercial functions, and it plans ways to curtail losses.
5.6 Identify the risks
A Risk Analysis has been always conducted by the Apple to avoid the risk and to classify the
numerous risks that customer commercial firms may face.
5.7 Prioritizing risks
Too much planning is sometime by the customer can make them confuse to select a product it
is the one of the biggest challenges of possibility planning is make sure that the customer do
not plan too much (Zapico, 2017).
6. CONTINGENCY PLAN
Following are the key steps that has been incorporated by Apple for the contingency plan and
maintaining a process:
i. Connect the plan to everybody in the firms.
ii. Notify all employee their parts and everyday jobs connected to the plan.
iii. Deliver essential exercise for persons to fulfil these parts and everyday jobs.
iv. Conduct tragedy drills where applied.
v. Measure the outcomes of exercises and trainings and make any essential variations.
vi. Appraisal the strategy on a steady groundwork, particularly if there are applicable
technological, working and personnel changes.
vii. Allocate reviewed strategies all over the corporation, and make sure that the old plan
must castoff.
viii. Review the plan occasionally.
ix. Reconsider the dangers to the business.
x. Examine exertions to control risk by associating actual outputs with the performance
levels pronounced in contingency plan.
xi. Indorse and make variations, if essential (Coelho, 2018)
7. RESOURCE REQUIRED
Apple was more focused on the Resource Planning strategies to make iPhone X a good
product. The resources are essential to obtained a good result and to compete the product
available in the market (Tarhini, 2015). Apple having user friendly interface which is upgrade
every time according to the customer requirement. Furthermore, the resource also required to
know how good the corporation’s work intake procedure is and how carefully managers
uphold their reserve pool. Resource attainment emphases on important the wants for the
project, and finding the correct resources for the crew and additional resources and
apparatuses available to achieve the exertion (Berton et al. 2015)
CONCLUSION
iPhone X made a revolution in the smartphone industry. Now days the impression of
exclusiveness is in customers mind along with one of the greatest expressively influential
letters were used in labelling. However, the price known to the customers was fundamentally
expensive, the established marketing technique of rotary despondent the cost in that way
called “magnetism costing” can still effect customer which more than purchaser might catch.
Apple can improve its corporate public responsibilities (CSR) act in the benefits of the
employees of businesses in iPhone X supply chain management strategies. Striking direction
on dealers is problematic considering changes in administrative context. The contingency
plan is used by Apple to make the iPhone X as a brand for customer to appeal for the product
and maintaining a process. Apple was more focused on the Resource Planning to made
iPhone X a good product by understanding the possibility of a got result and essential the
categories of resources wanted to complete the product research.
vi. Appraisal the strategy on a steady groundwork, particularly if there are applicable
technological, working and personnel changes.
vii. Allocate reviewed strategies all over the corporation, and make sure that the old plan
must castoff.
viii. Review the plan occasionally.
ix. Reconsider the dangers to the business.
x. Examine exertions to control risk by associating actual outputs with the performance
levels pronounced in contingency plan.
xi. Indorse and make variations, if essential (Coelho, 2018)
7. RESOURCE REQUIRED
Apple was more focused on the Resource Planning strategies to make iPhone X a good
product. The resources are essential to obtained a good result and to compete the product
available in the market (Tarhini, 2015). Apple having user friendly interface which is upgrade
every time according to the customer requirement. Furthermore, the resource also required to
know how good the corporation’s work intake procedure is and how carefully managers
uphold their reserve pool. Resource attainment emphases on important the wants for the
project, and finding the correct resources for the crew and additional resources and
apparatuses available to achieve the exertion (Berton et al. 2015)
CONCLUSION
iPhone X made a revolution in the smartphone industry. Now days the impression of
exclusiveness is in customers mind along with one of the greatest expressively influential
letters were used in labelling. However, the price known to the customers was fundamentally
expensive, the established marketing technique of rotary despondent the cost in that way
called “magnetism costing” can still effect customer which more than purchaser might catch.
Apple can improve its corporate public responsibilities (CSR) act in the benefits of the
employees of businesses in iPhone X supply chain management strategies. Striking direction
on dealers is problematic considering changes in administrative context. The contingency
plan is used by Apple to make the iPhone X as a brand for customer to appeal for the product
and maintaining a process. Apple was more focused on the Resource Planning to made
iPhone X a good product by understanding the possibility of a got result and essential the
categories of resources wanted to complete the product research.
REFERENCES
Banks, M.A., Vera, D., Pathak, S. and Ballard, K., 2016. Stakeholder management as a
source of competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 45, pp.18-27.
Baudry, G., Delrue, F., Legrand, J., Pruvost, J. and Vallée, T., 2017. The challenge of
measuring biofuel sustainability: A stakeholder-driven approach applied to the French
case. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, pp.933-947.
Breton Miller, L. and Miller, D., 2015. The paradox of resource vulnerability: Considerations
for organizational curatorship. Strategic management journal, 36(3), pp.397-415.
Brownlee, A. and Swan, J., 2017. Never mind the iPhone X, battery life could soon take a
great leap forward. The Conversation.
budget center. In Monitoring performance in the public sector (pp. 67-100). Routledge.
Coelho Albertin, Y., 2017. Supply Chain Risk management:: Understanding and Facing the
Main Risks on the Supply Chain.
Demir, A., 2017. Apple is trying to resolve many of their marketing and management
problems. PressAcademia Procedia, 4(1), pp.143-147.
Giachetti, C., 2018. Explaining Apple’s iPhone Success in the Mobile Phone Industry: The
Creation of a New Market Space. In Smartphone Start-ups (pp. 9-48). Palgrave
Macmillan, Cham.
Kotamarthi, K., Wang, X., Grossmann, G., Sheng, Q.Z. and Indrakanti, S., 2015, September.
A Framework Towards Model Driven Business Process Compliance and Monitoring.
In Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW), 2015 IEEE 19th
International (pp. 24-32). IEEE.
Mullin, T.M., Phillips, N.R., Martinez, C., Moorman III, C.T. and Bytomski, J.R., 2017. Use
of The SWAY Balance Application for The Apple IPhone as an Objective Assessment for
Sports-Related Concussion Balance Testing in High School and College Athletes. Sports
Injr Med: JSIMD-123. DOI, 10.
Russell, C.A., Russell, D.W. and Honea, H., 2016. Corporate social responsibility failures:
how do consumers respond to corporate violations of implied social contracts?. Journal of
business ethics, 136(4), pp.759-773.
Son, I., Lee, H. and Kim, J., 2015. Preannouncement effect of innovative new product on
global telecom industry: focused on iPhone. Indian Journal of Science and
Technology, 8(24).
Tarhini, A., Ammar, H. and Tarhini, T., 2015. Analysis of the critical success factors for
enterprise resource planning implementation from stakeholders’ perspective: A
systematic review. International Business Research, 8(4), p.25.
Zapico-Goñi, E., 2017. Performance monitoring for budget management: A new role of the
Banks, M.A., Vera, D., Pathak, S. and Ballard, K., 2016. Stakeholder management as a
source of competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 45, pp.18-27.
Baudry, G., Delrue, F., Legrand, J., Pruvost, J. and Vallée, T., 2017. The challenge of
measuring biofuel sustainability: A stakeholder-driven approach applied to the French
case. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, pp.933-947.
Breton Miller, L. and Miller, D., 2015. The paradox of resource vulnerability: Considerations
for organizational curatorship. Strategic management journal, 36(3), pp.397-415.
Brownlee, A. and Swan, J., 2017. Never mind the iPhone X, battery life could soon take a
great leap forward. The Conversation.
budget center. In Monitoring performance in the public sector (pp. 67-100). Routledge.
Coelho Albertin, Y., 2017. Supply Chain Risk management:: Understanding and Facing the
Main Risks on the Supply Chain.
Demir, A., 2017. Apple is trying to resolve many of their marketing and management
problems. PressAcademia Procedia, 4(1), pp.143-147.
Giachetti, C., 2018. Explaining Apple’s iPhone Success in the Mobile Phone Industry: The
Creation of a New Market Space. In Smartphone Start-ups (pp. 9-48). Palgrave
Macmillan, Cham.
Kotamarthi, K., Wang, X., Grossmann, G., Sheng, Q.Z. and Indrakanti, S., 2015, September.
A Framework Towards Model Driven Business Process Compliance and Monitoring.
In Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW), 2015 IEEE 19th
International (pp. 24-32). IEEE.
Mullin, T.M., Phillips, N.R., Martinez, C., Moorman III, C.T. and Bytomski, J.R., 2017. Use
of The SWAY Balance Application for The Apple IPhone as an Objective Assessment for
Sports-Related Concussion Balance Testing in High School and College Athletes. Sports
Injr Med: JSIMD-123. DOI, 10.
Russell, C.A., Russell, D.W. and Honea, H., 2016. Corporate social responsibility failures:
how do consumers respond to corporate violations of implied social contracts?. Journal of
business ethics, 136(4), pp.759-773.
Son, I., Lee, H. and Kim, J., 2015. Preannouncement effect of innovative new product on
global telecom industry: focused on iPhone. Indian Journal of Science and
Technology, 8(24).
Tarhini, A., Ammar, H. and Tarhini, T., 2015. Analysis of the critical success factors for
enterprise resource planning implementation from stakeholders’ perspective: A
systematic review. International Business Research, 8(4), p.25.
Zapico-Goñi, E., 2017. Performance monitoring for budget management: A new role of the
1 out of 7
Related Documents
Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
+13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
© 2024 | Zucol Services PVT LTD | All rights reserved.