This report provides insights into the competitive strategy of Amazon's Kindle Fire device, including a summary of the case study, business strategy analysis, and SWOT analysis.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: MANAGEMENT Competitive Strategy Name of the Student: Name of the University: Author Note:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1MANAGEMENT Executive Summary: The aim of the report is to provide an insight into competitive strategy of the Kindle Fire device of Amazon. The report commences with the summarization of the case study. Amazon’s Kindle Fire initially faced troubled in sales and faced immense competition from Apple iPad. The report discusses how the introduction of tablet increased the sales of the e book. The report also put forward a discussion on the business strategy of Amazon along with providing a SWOT analysis.
2MANAGEMENT Table of Contents Introduction:....................................................................................................................................3 Summary of the Case:......................................................................................................................3 Identification of the Strategic Issues................................................................................................5 Business Strategy of Amazon..........................................................................................................6 SWOT..............................................................................................................................................8 Conclusion:......................................................................................................................................8 References:......................................................................................................................................9
3MANAGEMENT Introduction: The report aims at providing an overview into the competitive strategy of Amazon’s Kindle Fire device. Amazon has been the world’s most renowned multinational company headquartered in Seattle. In the year 1999, Amazon accomplished its founding mission of becoming one of the largest online bookstores (aboutamazon.com 2019). The company also ventured into e-commerce, digital streaming, cloud computing and the artificial intelligence. Kindle Fire of Amazon has initially faced troubled with its sales. However, in a matter close to three months, the sales figures of Kindle portrayed that it captured closer to half the share of non Apple tablet market. Besides, it was also found that the worldwide sales of the e-books grew from lesser than 1 percent to close to 15 percent after the introduction of Kindle. The report commenced with a short summary of the case along with an identification of strategic issues. The report primarily concentrated on the business level strategy with a focus on the general, corporate and the functional strategy. The report also provided an insight to the SWOT analysis followed by a conclusion. Summary of the Case: The case here concentrates on the introduction of Amazon Kindle Fire device in January 2012 that helped in capturing more than half the market share of the non Apple tablet makers (Kristensen et al. 2017). The new products from Amazon have also enhanced the sale of the e- books to about 15 percent in the year 2012. Nevertheless, the CEO of the company had to refine the business strategy of Kindle Fire after the introduction of third generation of the iPad into the market. The position of Kindle Fire was also threatened by the introduction of the newer entrants like Samsung, Google and Motorola into the tablet market. The market share of Kindle Fire was
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4MANAGEMENT captured was also captured by an identical device known as the Nook (Wischenbart 2013). According to Jeff Bezos, Kindle Fire has been the key to the future of Amazon in hardware space. It has also been found that the stock of Amazon dropped by US$40 post the launch of Kindle Fire. Bezos wrestled with the various issues related to the strategy of Kindle Fire. The main concern was positioning the device in response to newer entrants into tablet market. There was also the concern of finding the most suitable target market for Kindle Fire and how it would remain positioned against the competing products (Azim and Hassan 2013). Amazon was solely concerned with turning sales success of Kindle into the business success. Amazon also rolled a platform for a Simple Storage Service (S3) and Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2). Besides, Amazon Web Services initially made up to only 3 percent which is expected to triple in following years. The focus of the internal technology for development has resulted in the significant benefit of the customers. The popularity of the Amazon Prime also helped in building a customer base that motivated the customers in shopping at the Amazon.com. Through the marketplace partners Amazon planned in offering the long tail offerings while lowering the overhead. In absence of the technological advancements customers would not have embraced Amazon as the way it is. Amazon since the founding possessed a stronger history of investing in the emerging years of opportunity ahead of the profitability and revenue (Stone 2013). Besides, the company took closer to six years in becoming profitable primarily due to its commitment to innovation. This commitment towards innovation drove Bezos in finding the hardware development group of
5MANAGEMENT Lab126 that led to the development of the future of the e-commerce and the one of the first successful e-reader known as Kindle Fire. Identification of the Strategic Issues Amazon’s Kindle Fire Device remained available a price of $ 199 and lacked many of the feature put forward by the iPad of Apple and thus resulted in mixed response (Ritala, Golnam and Wegmann 2014). There was a strong consensus amongst the market observers of Apple that it should not consider Kindle Fire as its threat and thereby continue in making powerful tablets. The Kindle Fire device did have any camera or microphone and has been available with limited memory capacity (Blake and Berger 2013). In fact it was a smaller app pool that did not have mobile broadband. This led the majority of the market observers in reckoning the fact that Kindle Fire did not have the capabilities of slaying the giant. It is this type of thinking that makes the higher performing companies like Apple vulnerable to the potential threats posed by the disruptive innovation of the competitors. Disruption occurs based on two given criteria. The first criteria are that the incumbents move up market in the profitable segments thereby ignoring the lower end competitors to the bottom of market (Rollins and Calabrese 2016). The second criteria are that a lower end competitor introduces product with business advantage or scalable technology at the core which has the potential of displacing the incumbent. Thus, it can be said that Kindle Fire of Amazon is a lower end competitor to iPad (Celestine 2011). However, Amazon’s device has a scalable technology at the core and ensures an extensive use of Cloud. This aspect however lacks in Apple. This is the reason why Amazon
6MANAGEMENT is able to get away with only 8 GB memory device. Besides, Kindle Fire also has a business model advantage and uses content for subsidizing hardware. Business Strategy of Amazon ThecorporatestrategyofAmazonisdescribedastheconcentricdiversification (Bharadwaj et al. 2013). This strategy depends on the leveraging of the technological capabilities for the success for the success of the business which is followed by strategy of cost leadership aimed towards offering maximum value to customers at lowest price while wrapping the business around customers. Amazon is found to act as the go to portal for meeting the needs of the online shopping. The strategy went well as Amazon can be viewed as one of the largest online retailer that has been a consistent leader in market segments where it operated (Mithas, Tafti and Mitchell, 2013). Having said this, it must be taken into account that the cost leadership might follow law of the diminishing returns where the firms following it are unable in sustaining growth or increasing profitability. Nevertheless, the generic business strategy of Amazon might be explained with help of the Ansoff Matrix described in the following figure. Amazon remains placed in the quadrant of the overall cost leadership and the constant focus on the costs acts as the key towards understanding the overall strategy. The particular measures undertaken by Amazon in this particular pursuit included steeper discounts for the regular members through Amazon Prime program thereby ensuring even and timely express delivery by waiving the shipping charges thereby passing the benefits of avoidance of the state taxes on the consumers through further
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7MANAGEMENT lowering the prices. Thus, the overall strategy depends on making the customer experience smooth and seamless as possible. Figure 1: Ansoff Matrix of Amazon Source:(Mohapatra 2013) Besides, the business strategy of Amazon is also driven by the sources of the competitive advantage where the focus remains on the technology thereby actualizing benefits of the economies of the scale along with the leveraging of the efficiencies from synergies between external and the internal sources that has acted as the cornerstone of business model. Amazon hasalsousedtheBigDataAnalyticsasthetoolformappingtheconsumerbehavior. Nevertheless, the overall cost leadership of Amazon with almost no product differentiation meant that the business model was copied by the competitors. Besides, the focus on the cost reduction at expense of the product differentiation meant that these products have been available
8MANAGEMENT in other portal and hence there existed no product line that remained unique or exclusive to it. Amazon does not stock the products that appeals to immediate gratification. Mostly, the consumers are seen to make impulsive choices. It is also to be noted that the functional strategy of Amazon is built across convenience aspect where consumers does not require visiting the store physically. They can place their order online and receive the order on the same day (Budzinski and Köhler 2015). The focus on non- retail product lines like the cloud based services implies that Amazon is addressing issues of differentiation and had overreliance on the cost leadership. In this context, it can be said that the business strategy of the Kindle Fire device has been designed for bringing the consumers closer to everything that support the sales of Amazon (Varia and Mathew 2014). Thus, pre-loading Kindle Fire paves the way of permeation and stimulation of connections between the marketers, consumers, content providers, services and goods in all corners of the $65 million annual sales.The business strategy of Kindle Fire clearly helps in protecting the media sales that generates over 30 percent of the revenue of Amazon. This helps in bolstering the revenues of Amazon against the recessionary hits although the e-retailing of Amazon has been on growth trajectory that appeared to be increasingly insulated from the economic pressures compared to the brick-and- motor retailers. SWOT Strength:Amazon Kindle Fire is the first in the industry that makes an e-reader. The price of the Kindle Fire device remains attractive to the people who are not able to afford Samsung Galaxy tablet or the iPad.
9MANAGEMENT Weakness:In order to protect the ecosystem, Amazon is making it difficult for the consumers to view the purchased book outside. The approach followed in targeting the avid readers with the Kindle Fire device narrowed the positioning strategy since the consumers perceived Kindle as the tablet for the book lovers. Opportunities:Amazon partners with the school so that the students are able to use the table as the primary text book. Threat:Apple seems to be not only their biggest threat but competitor having the first mover advantages. Conclusion: On a concluding note, it can be said that the future looks brighter for Amazon. Provided the company focuses on the core competencies along with the expansion of the international value chain then there exists no reason as to why Amazon cannot maintain the market leadership. Amazon though faced a tough competition from Apple in launching its Kindle Fire device as Apple kept betting that the Kindle Fire was not good enough. Jeff Bezos however wondered that it would be difficult for the Kindle Fire to survive amongst such tough competitors. Besides, Amazon also remained exposed to the demanding product cycles and fickled based on the whims of the technology customers. However, it can be mentioned from the report that Kindle Fire was not only well positioned for signaling to the investors regarding the futuristic growth prospects of the Amazon business.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
10MANAGEMENT References: aboutamazon.com 2019. [online] Available at:https://www.aboutamazon.com/ [ accessed 26 May, 2019] Azim, R. and Hassan, A., 2013. Impact analysis of wireless and mobile technology on business management strategies.Journal of Information and Knowledge Management,2(2), pp.141-150. Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O.A., Pavlou, P.A. and Venkatraman, N., 2013. Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights.MIS quarterly, pp.471-482. Blake,L.J.andBerger,K.A.,2013.AmazonKindleFireClaimsanImportantMarket Position.Journal of Case Studies,31(2), pp.91-97. Budzinski, O. and Köhler, K.H., 2015. Is Amazon The Next Google?.ORDO,66(1), pp.263-288. Celestine, 2011.Amazon's Kindle Fire Vs Apple's iPad: How dramatically different the two companiesare![online]Availableat: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/hardware/amazons-kindle-fire-vs-apples-ipad-how- dramatically-different-the-two-companies-are/articleshow/10198179.cms?from=mdr[Accessed 28 May 2019]. Kristensen, M., Penner, J., Nguyen, A., Moy, J. and Lam, S., 2017. Company Synopsis for: Amazon. com, Inc. Mithas, S., Tafti, A. and Mitchell, W., 2013. How a firm's competitive environment and digital strategic posture influence digital business strategy.MIS quarterly, pp.511-536.
11MANAGEMENT Mohapatra, S., 2013. E-commerce Strategy. InE-Commerce Strategy(pp. 155-171). Springer, Boston, MA. Ritala, P., Golnam, A. and Wegmann, A., 2014. Coopetition-based business models: The case of Amazon. com.Industrial Marketing Management,43(2), pp.236-249. Rollins, T. and Calabrese, A., 2016. Amazon. com. InGlobal Media Giants(pp. 427-441). Routledge. Stone, B., 2013.The everything store: Jeff Bezos and the age of Amazon. Random House. Varia, J. and Mathew, S., 2014. Overview of amazon web services.Amazon Web Services, pp.1- 22. Wischenbart, R., 2013.The global eBook market: current conditions & future projections. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".