Organisational Behaviour Analysis

This assignment delves into the field of organisational behaviour by examining various theories such as Maslow's Need Hierarchy and Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory. Students are tasked with analysing a provided CAPCO Case Study, applying these theoretical frameworks to understand communication channels, leadership styles, and the impact of teamwork within the organization. The analysis requires critical thinking, interpretation of data, and the ability to connect theoretical concepts with real-world business scenarios.

ORGANIZATION AND
BEHAVIOUR

Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................2
Task 1...............................................................................................................................................2
1.1 Compare and contrast organizational structure and culture:.................................................2
1.2 Relationship between structure and culture, and its impact on business:.............................3
1.3 Factors influence individual behaviour in an organization:..................................................4
Task 2...............................................................................................................................................5
2.1 Compare effectiveness of different leaderships in CAPCO and any other organization:....5
2.2 Organizational theories influence management practice......................................................7
2.3 Evaluation of different approaches of management used by CAPCO and ASDA..............8
TASK 3............................................................................................................................................9
3.1 Impact of different leadership styles on motivation..............................................................9
3.2 Comparison of different motivational theories within Capco Company............................10
3.3 Evaluation of usefulness of motivational theory for managers...........................................13
TASK 4..........................................................................................................................................14
4.1 Explanation of nature of groups and group behaviour in CAPCO Company.....................14
4.2 Factors that may promote or inhibit the development of effective teamwork within
CAPCO Company.....................................................................................................................15
4.3 Impact of technology on team functioning in CAPCO Company......................................16
CONCLUSION..............................................................................................................................17
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................18

Illustration Index
Illustration 1: Maslow's Need hierarchy theory.............................................................................11
Illustration 2: Herzberg's theory of motivation..............................................................................12
1

INTRODUCTION
Organization behaviour is a direct way of knowing company's behaviour within the firm
from multiple aspects. A firm possess number of employees those who work together to
achieve common business goal. Main purpose of organization behaviour is to understand and
control the behaviour of employees working within it(McKenna,2000). Behaviour can affects
individual or group of people and organization structure also. For the present report CAPCO
company is being taken into account. It is globally spread capital market company and working
in several financial sectors; banking, capital market, finance, risk, insurance and investment
management.
Present report will cover organization structure and culture and its impact on performance
of business. How leadership, organization theory, motivation and technology impacts on
performance of business. Organization behaviour is very important to know authority, power and
status of each function perform by people within the firm, improve human behaviour and to
increase performance of company. It deals with individual or group of people, organizational
structure, and how these all information can help business for effectiveness and development
(Aquinas, 2006). Humanistic and optimistic approach of organization behaviour help concern to
perform better and to satisfy people working within the enterprises.
Task 1
1.1 Compare and contrast organizational structure and culture:
Organization structure:
Organizational structure helps to know task allocation, coordination, supervision of
organization and how they related to each other to achieve the goal. There are three types of
structure: Hierarchical(tall), horizontal(flat), Matrix structure. In tall structure business is
organized in many layers and decision is taken by higher authority (French, 2011). In flat there
are fewer layers, decision taken by these few layers and group of workers working within these
layer. In matrix skilled people are required. To compare CAPCO structure, ASDA stores Ltd. has
been taken into practise. CAPCO follows flat organizational structure. This Horizontal structure
creates high motivation in the organization among employees. There are few layers of authority
so that decision making is fast and also communication between different departments is too
effective due to less number of layers. It encourage people to share their ideas and contribution
to achieve company's goal. ASDA follows hierarchical(tall) structure. There are lot of employees
2

working in an organization so information has to pass from one layer to another. And for
different layers there is different managers working so it take little time for decision making.
Organization culture:
Culture of organization show values, behaviour and its impact on environment of
company. Four types of culture are here. Power, role, task, person culture. In Power culture
power is held by few individuals . They take decision, how function will be done. In Role culture
responsibilities is distributed and controlled by everyone as per position. In task culture task is
important thing and decision is taken on behalf of team working. In person culture every one is
getting involved in decision making (Parikh, 2010). Being an entrepreneurial CAPCO'S culture
is person culture type. Employees has freedom and flexibility to work. Its culture emphasis
personal growth and rewards for good performance and also challenging portfolio so that people
can learn and take experience. Its culture is flexible, risk taking and creative. But in ASDA'S
culture because of mass employees working into organization, it is very difficult to keep updated
about individual performance so it focuses on customer service mainly. It believes that customers
are the heart of business so they should serve effectively by employees. Experience and strength
shared by each other.
1.2 Relationship between structure and culture, and its impact on business:
To achieve organization's goal it is very important to have a formal structure with good
values. Organization culture helps to define organization structure and also determines the
culture of firm. Structure determines roles and responsibilities of employees and monitoring of
employees (Singh,2009). In centralized structure all powers are in hand of higher authority and
in decentralized structure power is delegated to lower level so that worker feel satisfy with job
and their responsibilities thus work effectively for organization. In CAPCO structure and culture
are inter related. This impacts on culture and same it also impacts on structure as well. As
CAPCO is having less number of layers in its structure so communication in between several
employees are quite easy to perform. And because of this employees are satisfy with their role
and working their best that gives organization profit and more productivity. As it's culture is too
flexible and creative and its flat so employees need to meet with several changes and perform
these tasks so by this they will be able to learn new things and have experience to deal with
several changing conditions. This provides it competitive environment so that can serve better to
its customer. Due to flat structure follow by CAPCO so communication is easy, also decision
3

making is frequent thus employees are highly motivated and do their best to achieve goal of
organization. By this way company will grow and increase its productivity and profitability.
Suitable culture and structure of an organization encourage risk-taking and innovation. As
CAPCO is following flat structure it increasing risk taking programme to innovate new thing in
business (Ranganayakulu, 2005). Because structure is simple and easy so it increases better
coordination between employees, and employees can take risk easily and thus it helps to know
new ideas and innovate new things which can help to achieve targets of company. If structure
and culture is good then loyalty increase and people get motivated and behave positive towards
company. These all factors help employee to perform better for organization thus business will
be profitable.
1.3 Factors influence individual behaviour in an organization:
There are several factors which influence individual behaviour in CAPCO:
1. Personal factor
2. Environmental factors
3. Organizational factors
Personal factor:
Personal factors which influence individual behaviour are as Biographic and Learned.
Biographic characters like age, gender, religion, marital status, experience, intelligence, ability
etc. affects individual behaviour. In learned factor personality, perception, attitude, values etc.
affects behaviour of individual.
Environment factors:
1. Economic factor:
 Employment level and wages: As CAPCO having few layers of hierarchy in its
decision making process so work pressure is too high so me times and employee feels
dissatisfy because according work pressure he is not getting salary (Singh, 2009). And
also other companies are giving more monetary values to employee then also he thinks
for leaving job.
 Technological development: As market is changing rapidly, new technologies are being
in used. Management of CAPCO try to give training in an effective manner so that people
can easily adapt new changes. But some times employees are not comfortable with these
changes and that show in their behaviour.
4

2. Socio- culture factor:
In this employee's friends, family influence affect his behaviour. Ethics of individual, values,
background of individual affects their behaviour(Carr, 2002).
3. Political factor:
Political changes affects individual behaviour. Market shares, values of company get affected
and also change in political background affect individual job performance also. Thus this impact
on employee's behaviour.
4. Legal factor:
Laws and regulations affect individual behaviour and affect his performance.
Organizational factors:
 Physical facilities: like nature of job, office furnishing etc. impacts on individual
behaviour.
 Organization design, culture and structure: Nature of communication, involvement in
CAPCO affects behaviour of individual.
 Leadership: Supervisor behaviour, how employee is getting response from his team
leader. That affect individual behaviour.
 Reward system: Company is giving reward and recognition to individual or not that is
very important. Y this people get motivated. Thus reward system influence individual
behaviour (O’Rawe, 2010).
So that there are many factors which impacts on individual behaviour. As individual is an
important part of organization. It is necessary that individual should have job satisfaction and
perform good to achieve organization goal. These above maintained factors affects individually
and can affect business as well.
Task 2
2.1 Compare effectiveness of different leaderships in CAPCO and any other organization:
Being a global financial organization it is very important to have a good leadership.
Leader should have power, knowledge and ability to motivate his team in a manner so that
employee have faith in their leader. To compare with CAPCO , ASDA has been taken into
practice.
CAPCO company ASDA supermarket Ltd.
5

It has democratic leadership It has Autocratic leadership.
Democratic leadership also called as
participative leadership where employees are
more coordinated and share their ideas and
views in front of higher authority. And higher
authority or team leader think upon their views
and finally implement those ideas if found
suitable for organization.
Autocratic leadership is that where decision
making power is in the hand of managers.
ASDA is having a long hierarchy so total
power is distributed in several department's
authorities. And decisions imposes on
employees. And no one can change their
decision.
Advantages:
 Good learning experience
 Good communication and participation
 More job satisfaction and less job turn
over
 More creativity and innovation
 Highly motivated employees
 Increase production
Advantages:
 Controlling and strict management
 Motivation and rewards
 Individual decision making
 Skilled persons in organization
Disadvantages:
 Slow decision making process
 less competent
Disadvantages:
 Poor and negative motivation
 Less creativity
 Low moral of workers
As in CAPCO there are more coordination between employees and authority so
employees participation is much more than autocratic leadership. Workers and other
management get involved in decision making process. As hierarchy is limited so coordination is
high that helps to increase production. And leaders are so much involve in this and motivate
people to work better (Hosie and Smith, 2009). By this way leaders utilize employee's skill and
knowledge effectively. People get motivated by mentors in this environment and perform their
best to achieve organization's goal. But because of power is decentralized some times decision
6

making takes time. But in ASDA people get recolonization and reward. Decision making is quit
fast. And also strong chain of control is here but it is not good because people feels demotivated
at work place. And unable to perform as they have ability to perform. Thus poor performance
decrease production of company and also employee will be unable to satisfy its customer as well.
2.2 Organizational theories influence management practice
There are several organization theories. Scientific management theory, Classical theory,
Bureaucracy theory, Human relation approach, System approach, Contingency approach.
Scientific management theory:
Scientific management theory influences general management practice. Planning, quality
control, cost accounting etc. influence by this theory (Oplatka and Stundi, 2011). This is useful
theory and used in almost every where. In this manager having all the required information and
analysis it and then use it as per mathematical formulas In this kind of theory scientific method
are used to train employees. For management this theory helps to utilize resources in a better
manner. It helps in reduction in production cost. Harmonious relationship developed between
workers and management.
Human resource theory:
This theory helps to know how management behaviour and structure impacts on
employees behaviour. Each employee have quality like more skilled, creative more responsible,
self directed etc. This theory helps to identifies employees behaviour and its impact on
management. This theory supports human relations in an organization
(Curtis, 2003).
Classical theory:
It is traditional used theory. Classical analysis done on each aspect. This theory focus on
nation's wealth and promote national economic expansion.
These all theories help to identify the structure of organization, working function of
organization, behaviour of employees and management behaviour. CAPCO is using Scientific
management theory in its practice (O’Keeffe, 2002. CAPCO is using latest technologies in its
working functions so large production is done by this and thus it helps to reduce cost of
production. Employees are more coordinative so that better understanding is here and better
quality produce by this way. Scientific theory gives a benefit of simplification . Tasks are
divided into team so that work become easy and more economic benefits can be earned. This
7

theory avoids disputes between labour and management because of close communication and
better understanding. So that there is less conflicts issues that helps management to perform
better. By this way management can provide better working conditions. Consumer gets quality of
product and they are much more satisfy that increases brand value of management (Bissell and
Dolan,2012). This theory helps to achieve CAPCO goal and objectives. And management can
provides better guidance for effective working and can motivate employees. Some times CAPCO
uses human resource theory also it helps it to understand employee's skilled and resources can be
used in an effective manner.
2.3 Evaluation of different approaches of management used by CAPCO and ASDA
There are several kinds of approaches used by different organizations. These are Passive
management, steering, capacity building approach. CAPCO generally capacity building approach
in its practice. As CAPCO is having few layers in its organization structure so people are much
more connected with each other (Okurame, 2012). Management is capable to identifies skilled
of each employees. And can know needs and requirement of employees. And to satisfy employee
motivate them according to their need. Thus by this way working capabilities of employee will
increase and he will do better work at work place. Employee will be much more loyal towards
company as well. It will help to know employee's problem and find its solution for making
workplace effective. In this approach employees have flexibility to work that enhance their
confidence. In this approach objective is very much clear that is to enhance capacity of
employees so that they can perform better at workplace and give good result to company.
In ASDA steering management approach is used by management. It is focusing on
rewards and recognition of employees. By this approach firm can make plans, strategies and
implement in a way so that result could have become positive. As planning and processing is
pre-define it helps to identify circumstances coming in business and what prevention should take
to deal with these problems (Hashim and Wok, 2014). If problems are identify in a right manner
then employees will work good because good environment is here and it impacts on business
productivity. Profitability of organization will increase if more satisfy people are in it.
8

TASK 3
3.1 Impact of different leadership styles on motivation
Before choosing any leadership style CAPCO management first analyze their internal
environment and according to their environment they choose their leadership style. At their
internal environment management chooses Democratic leadership styles(Parikh, 2010). It is
beneficiary for their better development of firm. By adopting this, they can easily create a
positive relationship with their staff members (McKenna,2000). The impact of leadership style
on Capco company as follows:
Democratic leadership style
Democratic leadership style provides more flexibility and freedom to their all staff
members. In this leadership style, management involved their all staff member into decision
making process and before taking any decision take advise from all employees (Aquinas, 2006).
By doing this they create a positive relationship with their staff members and build the power of
trust. On other hand, when company involved them at the time of decision making process so
they all are feel motivated and they can easily give their best efforts to CAPCO. Furthermore,
they all are ready to accept all challenge task at workplace. Apart from this, organization
provides all the facilities to their staff member and time to time organized team meting with their
staff members (Parikh, 2010). In this, manager analyse the changing behaviour of their staff
members and by providing proper suggestion solve their queries.
Autocratic leadership style
Autocratic leadership style provides fewer opportunities to the staff members of CAPCO.
On other hand, management do not involved their staff members into decision making process.
Apart from this, they are providing direction to their all employees so they can easily do their
work. Staff members follow all the instruction of their top management (Parikh, 2010). But the
negative point of this leadership style is employees they feel demotivated and cannot give their
best output to the CAPCO (Ranganayakulu, 2005). The main reason behind this is, management
feel that their all staff members are not capabler to take any decision and if they take wrong
decision so the brand image of the company goes down. So they do not involved they at the time
of decision making process.
Laissez-Faire leadership style
9

This leadership style provides all the freedom to their all staff members, where they can
take their all decision as per their thoughts. For this, sometimes they take a suggestion form their
top management (Hashim and Wok, 2014). By doing this, can easily create a positive
environment at CAPCO company. It motivates the workers and also increase their decision
making capability. Further, by adopting the leadership style staff member become more
responsible and increase the power of empowerment.
3.2 Comparison of different motivational theories within Capco Company
Motivational theories are based on the behaviours and satisfaction level of all employees
who are working at CAPCO. By involving their all staff members into decision making process
they increase the level of motivation at workplace. On other hand, when employees feel
motivated so they give their best efforts to the company (Alavosius, Houmanfar and Biglan,
2016). At their internal environment CAPCO use two different theories and they are as follows:
Maslow's Need hierarchy theory
10

As per the case scenario, it has been considered that various satisfaction level of
individual is considerations. By using this motivational theory, management of CAPCO
motivated their all employees. The need and expectation of motivation is different for all staff
members like some people motivated with monetary benefits further, the other people are
motivated with promotions and recognition (De and Den Hartog, 2010). For this, it is important
form management to motivate their all employees by providing them appraisal, incentives and
adopting reward system. Maslow's theory is based on needs and expectation of staff workers
from their company. It starts with the workers basic needs and end on self acquisition. It is
divided into five parts where the first one is explains the physiological needs and it includes such
as water, food, shelter (Leaders and teamwork, 2012). The second level is described the safety
11
Illustration 1: Maslow's Need hierarchy theory
(Sources: De and Den Hartog, 2010)

needs of safety and security and safety. Third level is based on love and belongingness needs,
fourth level is retreated to self esteem and the last level based on self actualization level.
Herzberg's theory of motivation
Herzberg theory has identified as two factors theories and it can be used to improve the
satisfaction level of all staff workers of Capco (CAPCO Case study, 2016). These factors are
based on hygienic factors and motivators. Motivators includes growth opportunities, promotion,
responsibilities, recognition achievement. These factors help the management to boost up the
motivation of workers and in the absence of this factor they are not able to survive to workplace.
Apart from these, an employee cannot live without hygienic factors. It also provides good
working conditions, relations and compensation, job supervision and job security. These all the
basic need which every employees want form their management. Company provide all the basic
facilities to their all employees so they can easily do their work and give their best performance
to company.
12
Illustration 2: Herzberg's theory of motivation
(Sources: CAPCO Case study, 2016)

3.3 Evaluation of usefulness of motivational theory for managers
Nowadays the competitions in the organisation growing so fast as compare to last few
decades and all management want from their employees that they perform well and show their
best capabilities at workplace (Parikh, 2010). So it is important for manager to motivate their all
staff members and understand their problems and changing behaviour toward their work. By
applying an appropriate motivation theories, they can easily boost up the efficiency of their
employees. On other hand, it will also reduce the turnover and apply relevant motivation
theories. At CAPCO Company provide all the basic facilities like; water, good, transportation
services etc. to their all employees so they can easily give their best performance to firm and
increase their profit (De and Den Hartog, 2010). Apart from this, management time to time
ensure that organisation have strong relationship between the reward system and motivation
theories. For better motivation, company adopt Maslow's and Heidelberg theory at their
workplaces. There are some benefit for motivational theories and they are as follows:
 By adopting rewarding system at CAPCO, management can easily achieve their goals
and objective. The reason behind this is motivated employees give their best efforts to the
company and increase their profit.
 Staff members of firm, have become more motivated and they can easily accept all the
necessary changes which are related to workplace.
 Motivation theory provides Better coordination, team work and productivity (Chiang and
Hsieh,2012).
 Development in communication channel
 It has developer the creativity and innovation of all staff members at the workplace
 It provides positive culture and with the help of this, employees feel more empowered
 Reduction in absenteeism and employee turnover
By adopting two different motivational theories' management can easily understand their
requirement of all employees (Anderson,otočnik and Zhou, 2014). Furthermore, by this they can
easily understand their satisfaction level of each staff members. With the help of Herzberg theory
the can easily understand the satisfaction and dissatisfaction level which are presentable at
workplace (Alavosius, Houmanfar and Biglan, 2016). On other hand, with the help of Maslow
theory management can easily change their human resources theories and make them better as
13

per the demand of employees of CAPCO. The manager has to ensure that, they undertaken
appraisal and induction program, as to check the effectiveness of all programs.
TASK 4
4.1 Explanation of nature of groups and group behaviour in CAPCO Company
CAPCO management believes in team work rather than individual work and the reason
behind this is when peoples do their work into the teams so they can easily do their work and
improve their capabilities (Hashim and Wok, 2014). Furthermore, it also increases the
knowledge of all employees as well. Team work are more effective as compare to individual
work and the reason behind this is, it involves the contribution of different staff members. On
other hand, it also provides the learning opportunity and growth to all employees. In company,
every task divided into the teams and it is a combination of 5-6 peoples. Organisation follows
some standard format and at the time of making team there will be one team leader who guide
their all teams and solve their queries (Oplatka and Stundi, 2011). Moreover, they also ensure
that all the members get equal rights and opportunities at CAPCO. By adopting this format, all
employees can easily do their work and give their best concentration at workplace. When
members do their work into the teams so it increases the power of trust and creates a positive
relationship among all staff members. In company all work are divided into two types of teams
where the first group is known as formal group (Oplatka and Stundi, 2011). This group follow all
the rules and regulation which are provided by the top management. Further, it lo the foll the
standard format at workplace. In the formal group, all members share their ideas and views to
each other and complete the task which are provided by the top management. Formal groups are
important for CAPCO and with the help of this they can easily increase their profit.
Apart from this, informal group are based on the hobbies and person interest. The
employees do not follow any kind of rules and regulation in this group (O’Rawe, 2010). On other
hand, they do not perform any kind of task at workplace and they all are free to share their ideas
with teach other. All the decision are taken by workers quickly and there are no communication
gaps. The major disadvantage of informal group is, they do not follow any kind of rules and
regulations so due to this, lot of misunderstanding creates and the discipline into the environment
goes down.
CAPCO manager usually for all the formal structure at their workplace and by doing this
group they maintain their standard into the employees mind (Ranganayakulu, 2005). With the
14

help of this group they can easily solve complex problems of employees and all staff members
provide creative ideas. Apart from this, it leads to the development of every members of the
team.
4.2 Factors that may promote or inhibit the development of effective teamwork within CAPCO
Company
CAPCO has been very supportive for their all staff members. By providing flexible
working environment, management encourage the capacity of all employees (Aquinas, 2006).
Furthermore, at their workplace they adopt ' Rocket team' concept. On other hand there are so
many factors that affect the teamwork in CAPCO company and they are as follows:
Individual commitments
In this, management divide their all work into the team and by doing this they decrease
the work load from staff members (Ranganayakulu, 2005). In team all peoples can easily share
their ideas and views to each other and do their work without any pressure.
Synergy
Group performance give better results due to the combined efforts of the staff members.
In groups they share their ideas, views and knowledge to each other. Rocket teams have given
better result as compare to individual performance.
Size of the groups
At the time of planning rocket teams appropriately 5-6 members are the part of the team.
The major benefit of rocket team is it reduce the negative impact of misunderstanding and
increase the working capabilities (Oplatka and Stundi, 2011).
Norms
All groups having their norms and rules and it is important for all staff members to follow
all the legislation and maintain the standard of organisation (Alavosius, Houmanfar and Biglan,
2016). CAPCO company also take negative actions against those who does not follow all the
rules and legislation at workplace.
Leadership
Every team having one team leader and this person guides the whole team and solve their
queries which are related to the workplace (Bissell and Dolan,2012). A leader should be
knowledgable and allow other members to share their opinions to everyone.
15

Communication
In CAPCO it is management responsibility to make the communication proper and by
adopting all the latest technology reduce the level of misunderstanding among all department.
4.3 Impact of technology on team functioning in CAPCO Company
Communication plays an important role at the time of decision making process. With the
help of an appropriate technology CAPCO company can easily reduce the negative impact of
misunderstanding at the workplace (French, 2011). At their workplace, management improve
their technology and also increase their profit as well. For completing any tasks they update their
software and the process of information are also improved. Company update their website and
with the help of this site they communicate with their customers. For improving the working
capabilities of all staff member they time to time organised training and development session. In
this, they improve their working quality and solve their queries. For reduce the work load, they
divide the whole work into the teams (Parikh, 2010). For check the quality of their products they
use total quality management and with the help of this they check the positive and negative
aspects of each products. For check the performance of every staff member they use balance
scorecard and according to the performance of employees they declared star performance of the
month. For an appropriate communication at different level of department, CAPCO use email,
video conferences, messages, Google Drive etc. The reason behind using such types of
technologies at the workplace is working in diversify products and increase the business in
various countries with the help of different workforces (Ranganayakulu, 2005). So it is important
for the engagement to use all the technologies for communication at workplace. There are a
possibility of positive and negative aspects on the CAPCO company. The positive impacts are
based on that, with the help of the latest technology all employs can easily do their work and
reduce the negative impact of misunderstanding. By adopting all the new technologies'
management can makes the work faster and easier (Oplatka and Stundi, 2011). The second major
advantage of the latest technology is all employees can easily send the information from one
county opt another country. With the help of cloud computing, company can also store the
customer data, business partners, vendors list and market research very easily. The negative
impact is that, anyone can access the secure data of the organisation and use for their personnel
benefits. On other hand, promotion, incentives all things are based on the performance of
workers (Oplatka and Stundi, 2011). CAPCO ahas started using Database management system
16

(DBMS) and with the help of this company save all the data of their staff members and
customers as well.
CONCLUSION
According to the present report it has been concluded that, organisation behaviour helps
in the development of human resources in the organisation. CAPCO also adopted flat
organisation structure at their workplace and they also provide all kind of freedom to their all
staff members. So they can easily share their idea and views to each other. For better motivations
company use Maslow's and Herzberg theory at their workplace and boost up employees'
satisfaction level. On other hand, they also divide the whole work into the teams and increase the
level of satisfaction at workplace. Organizational behaviour helps to identifies the working
pattern of employees working in a firm (Hashim and Wok, 2014). Company's structure and
culture affects human behaviour. By this way they will feel motivated and perform better in work
place that will help to enhance profitability of enterprise. Leaders motivate their staff, by getting
positive motivation workers perform their best to achieve organization goal. There are several
factors which enhance team building. As strong coordination is between team member then
much more effective and quality work will be there. Market is changing day by day that latest
technologies are in used to be in the competition it is very important to keep update yourself to
do better task in an organization. If there is more effectiveness in working pattern then it will be
good sign for organization.
17

REFERENCES
Books and Journals
Alavosius, M., Newsome, D., Houmanfar, R. and Biglan, A., 2016. A functional contextualist
analysis of the behavior and organizational practices relevant to climate change. The Wiley
Handbook of Contextual Behavioral Science. pp.513-530.
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K. and Zhou, J., 2014. Innovation and creativity in organizations a state-
of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of
Management. 40(5). pp.1297-1333.
Ankli. E. R. and Palliam. R., 2012. "Enabling a motivated workforce: exploring the sources of
motivation". Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal. 26(2).
pp. 7 – 10.
Aquinas, P., 2006. Organisation Behaviour. Excel Books India.
Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K. and Li, N., 2013. The theory of purposeful work behavior: The role
of personality, higher-order goals, and job characteristics. Academy of Management Review.
38(1). pp.132-153.
Bissell, G. and Dolan, P., 2012. Organisational Behaviour for Social Work. Policy Press.
Borkowski, N., 2015. Organizational behavior in health care. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
Carr, A., 2002. Organisational Culture: Organisational Change?. Journal of Organizational
Change Management. 15(4). pp.425 – 432.
Chiang, C.F. and Hsieh, T.S., 2012. The impacts of perceived organizational support and
psychological empowerment on job performance: The mediating effects of organizational
citizenship behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(1). pp.180-190.
Curtis, S., 2003. Lies, damned lies and organisational politics. Industrial and Commercial
Training. 35(7). pp.293 - 297.
Daft, L. R., 2010. Organization Theory and Design. Cengage Learning.
De Jong, J. and Den Hartog, D., 2010. Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and
Innovation Management. 19(1). pp.23-36.
French, R., 2011. Organizational Behaviour. John Wiley & Sons.
Hashim, J. and Wok, S., 2014. Predictors to employees with disabilities’ organisational
behaviour and involvement in employment. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An
International Journal. 33(2). pp.193 – 209.
18

Hosie, P. and Smith, R., 2009. A future for organisational behaviour?.European Business
Review. 21(3). pp.215 – 232.
McKenna, E., 2000. Business Psychology and Organisational Behaviour: A Student's Handbook.
Psychology Press.
O’Keeffe, T., 2002. Organisational learning: a new perspective. Journal of European Industrial
Training. 26(2/3/4). pp.130 – 141.
O’Rawe, M., 2001. Mastering Organisational Behaviour. Leadership & Organization
Development Journal. 22(8). pp.402 – 404.
Okurame, D., 2012. Impact of career growth prospects and formal mentoring on organisational
citizenship behaviour. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 33(1). pp.66 – 85.
Oplatka, I. and Stundi, M., 2011. The components and determinants of preschool teacher
organisational citizenship behaviour. International Journal of Educational Management.
25(3). pp.223 – 236.
Pan , F. X., Qin , Q. and Gao , F., 2014. Psychological ownership, organization-based self-
esteem and positive organizational behaviors. Chinese Management Studies. 8(1). pp.127 –
14.
Parikh, 2010. Organisational Behaviour. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
Ranganayakulu, K., 2005. Organisational Behaviour. Atlantic Publishers & Dist.
Singh, K., 2009. Organizational Behaviour: Text and Cases. Pearson Education India.
Singh, N., 2001. Organisational Behaviour: Concepts, Theory and Practices : Managing People
and Organisations in the 21st Century. Deep and Deep Publications.
Online
CAPCO Case study. 2016. [Online]. Available through:<
http://businesscasestudies.co.uk/CAPCO/organisational-structure-in-an-innovative-
environment/communication-channels.html#axzz4Bu5CWdKf>. [Assessed on: 4th July,
2016].
Leaders and teamwork. 2012. [Online]. Available through:< CAPCO Case study. 2016.
[Online]. Available
through:<http://www.forbes.com/sites/hbsworkingknowledge/2012/12/28/why-leaders-need-
to-rethink-teamwork/#9cfb363662b4>. [Assessed on: 4th July, 2016].
19