Peer Review Form for Methodology

Running head: PEER REVIEW FORM FOR METHODOLOGY
Peer Review Form for Methodology
Name of the University:
Name of the Student:
Author Note:

1PEER REVIEW FORM FOR METHODOLOGY
Criteria Reviewer comments
(including guidance for
improvement)
My reflections on the
reviewer comments
A general overview: Is the
research to date clear and
presented appropriately?
Do you think the length is
appropriate at this point?
Is the information presented in
a suitable fashion that some
understanding can be given?
The length of the research is
appropriate. It consists of 3000
words and the topic is being
clearly addressed, along with
proper citations and references.
The information is being
presented in a suitable fashion
along with correct citations.
Please comment on the
content of the research to date
 Explains the theoretical
framework underlying
your assumption of our
social worlds and discuss
the relevance of a
qualitative/quantitative/m
ixed approach to your
own study.
 Selection of
samples/participants:
describe how many
people are to take part in
your study, their
For the research, the
information will be collected
from various sources, which
includes both primary as well
as secondary data sources.
Starting from the beginning the
primary data has been collected
from various sources such as
surveys, questionnaires and
observations. In addition to
these form of sources, the
secondary sources are also
there, which consists of the
information that are
particularly available on the