logo

People in Project Management Essay

   

Added on  2020-07-23

15 Pages3772 Words67 Views
PEOPLE IN PROJECTMANAGEMENT

Table of ContentsINTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1TASK 1............................................................................................................................................1BELBIN TEAM ROLE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION.........................................................1BTRSPI REPORT AND NEAMA PROJECT SUMMARY.................................................6TEAM ROLE BEHAVIOUR AND INFLUUENCES.........................................................10CONCLUSION..............................................................................................................................11REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................13

INTRODUCTIONThe report will cover research to undertake and identify personality types and personalstyles associated with various theories and models effectively. Team roles are identified andbehavioural cluster focusing on performance and design of team will be discussed in this report.Role theory of Bilbin and concept of emerged that individual behaviour could be predicted onthe team basis will be covered. Individual characteristics at workplace and conflictingcharacteristics required for a successful business operational activities and response will bediscussed in this report. Team benefits, project management and personalities combining withright benefits which optimise the behavioural strengths to minimise weaknesses will be discussedin this report.TASK 1BELBIN TEAM ROLE SUMMARY DESCRIPTIONTeam RoleContributionAllowable WeaknessesPlantCreative ideas, solve difficultproblems and free thinkingenvironment.Ignore incidentals and also too per-occupied to communicate. ResourceinvestigatorEnthusiastic, communicative,outgoing, explore opportunities anddevelop contacts.Over optimistic and loses interestonce initial enthusiasm has passed.Co-ordinatorConfident, mature, identify the talentsand clarify the goals and objectives.It can be seen as a manipulative andoffloads own work share.ShaperDynamic, challenging, thrives onstress and pressure. Has also driveand encourage to overcome obstacles.Prone to provocation and offendsfeelings of people.Monitorevaluator Sober, discerning and strategic. Allthe options should be analysed andjudges accurately.Lack of drive and ability to inspireothers and can be overly critical. Team workerCo-operative, perceptive anddiplomatic in nature. Listen to all andaverts friction.Indecisive in crunch conditions andavoid confrontation.ImplementerReliable, effective, practical and alsoSome what inflexible and slow also1

turn ideas into actions and organisethe work which needs to be done.to respond new opportunities.CompletefinisherPainstaking, anxious, polishes,conscientious and perfect.Reluctant to delegate service andinclined to worry unduly.SpecialistSingle and broad market, selfstarting, dedicated, provides effectiveknowledge and skills related tosupply.Contributes only on narrow anddwells on technicalities. Belbin team model and theory has highly and widely regarded across the world. It can besaid that it has not come with any critics (Kerzner and Kerzner, 2017). Academics havequestioned the true validity and reliability of the Belbin Team Role Self Perception Inventory(BTRSPI) as the predictive tool underpinning the theory along with criticisms relating to the“ipsative versus normative data debate” with stating that “no strong support was found forBelbins team role balance”. Belbins research progressed from psychometric causative testing toassessment methods that did not rely on forcing participants to chose when considering if aweakness existed alongside a team role strength. There are some strength and weaknessesassociated with team role.Team RoleAllowableNot allowablePlantPractical matters ideas are rejected.Strong ownership of idea when co-operation with others would yieldeffective results.ResourceinvestigatorLoss of enthusiasm once initialexcitement is passed.Letting clients down by neglecting tofollow arrangements.Co-ordinatorAn inclination to be lazy if any oneelse can be found to do work.Taking credits from the efforts ofteam.ShaperA proneness to frustration andtension.Responsibilities to recover situationand good humour or apologyMonitorevaluator Scepticism with logic at its core Cynicism without any logics.Team workerIndecision with important issuesAvoiding conditions that may entail2

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Belbin Team Theory and Reflection as an Intern Engineer
|20
|4732
|254

Reflective Writing on 4 Skills: Belbin Teamwork, De Bono's Thinking, GROW Model, and Critical Thinking
|8
|2229
|25

Project Planning Management and Control Case Study 2022
|27
|6181
|20

Team Building & Leadership Assignment
|13
|2656
|35

Effective Team Building - PDF
|16
|3270
|40

Belbin Team Role Theory
|11
|526
|29