Project Plan for CQU Educational Hubs for Indigenous Studies Project

PMMP 20008 – Initiating and Planning Projects (T2) Assignment 2
PROJECT NAME: CQU EDUCATIONAL HUBS
FOR INDIGENOUS STUDIES
PROJECT
TERM & ASSIGNMENT # TERM 2, ASSIGNMENT 2
TITLE: PROJECT PLAN
STUDENT
NAME
STUDENT NUM-
BER
QUESTIONS AN-
SWERED (BE SPECIFIC)
Please Insert Please Insert Please Insert
Please Insert Please Insert Please Insert
Please Insert Please Insert Please Insert
Please Insert Please Insert Please Insert
CAMPUS: Please Insert
TUTOR: Please Insert
TUTORIAL NUMBER: Please Insert
Assignment 2 PPMP20008 (T2 – 2019) V5

PMMP 20008 – Initiating and Planning Projects (T2) Assignment 2
1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION (TOTAL = 4 MARKS)
1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION, BACKGROUND AND MAJOR DELIVERABLES (1
MARK)
Response Table
1 Description A project is undertaken by the School of Engineering
and Technology (SET), to provide visibility and
sustainability to the some of the oldest culture in the
world. The project aims in development of the
educational hubs
2 Background The project of establishing the educational hubs are
considered for encouraging and supporting the need of
education among the local indigenous people
3 Major Deliverables The main deliverables of the chosen project include-
1. Finding suitable Facility Space
2. Designing and Building Educational Hubs
3. Organizing and conducting opening ceremonies.
1.2 JUSTIFICATION (3 MARKS)
Response Table
Output Outcome Benefits
Development of
Educational Hubs
Awareness among local
indigenous people
Acknowledge of the
traditional culture
2 STAKEHOLDERS (TOTAL = 10 MARKS)
2.1 KEY STAKEHOLDER LIST (6 MARKS)
Response Table
# Stakeholder Category (i.ie Sponsor /
Supplier / User)
Description of
Interest
Description of
Influence
1. Local Indigenous
People
User High Medium
2. SET Sponsor High High
Assignment 2 PPMP20008 (T2 – 2019) V5

PMMP 20008 – Initiating and Planning Projects (T2) Assignment 2
3. NAIDOC
committee
Supplier Medium High
4. CQU Campuses Sponsor High High
5. Students Users Low Low
6. Project Manager Supplier High Low
2.2 STAKEHOLDERS ENGAGEMENT ASSESSMENT MATRIX (3 MARKS)
Response Table
# Stakeholders Unaware Resistan
t
Neutral Supportive Leadin
g
1. Local Indigenous
People
C D
2. SET C D
3. NAIDOC
committee
C D
4. CQU Campuses D C
5. Students C D
6. Project Manager C D
Assignment 2 PPMP20008 (T2 – 2019) V5

PMMP 20008 – Initiating and Planning Projects (T2) Assignment 2
2.3 STAKEHOLDER COMMUNICATION (1 MARK)
Response Table
Communication Method Interactive, Pull or Push Justification
Email and
communication in face
to face mode
Interactive The interactive type
of communication is
chosen for this case
as it will help all the
stakeholders to easily
communicate with
each other. Prompt
response is absent in
Push type of
communication and
therefore it should be
avoided, while the pull
type of
communication is
accessible to a
recipient on his terms
and therefore
indicates delayed
communication (Butt,
Naaranoja &
Savolainen, 2016).
2.4 OBTAINING EXPERT JUDGEMENT (1 MARK)
Response Table
Experts Methods / Techniques
SET Brainstorming (Iglesias et al. 2016)
NAIDOC Interview (Wilson 2017)
Assignment 2 PPMP20008 (T2 – 2019) V5