Project Variance and Issue Analysis
Added on 2020-02-24
6 Pages2565 Words77 Views
|
|
|
PROJECT CONTROLS REPORTKERB CONSTRUCTION PROJECTAT FISON AVE WESTPPMP20010 Project Controls Report for Controls Assignment1PROJECT INFORMATIONProject Name: Kerb Construction Project at Fison Ave WestDate: 26 August 2017Project Ownership: Project Management OfficePrepared by:Student’s name, PMODistribution List:Engineer-In-Charge, TMRTejas Mehta, Project ManagerLocal Authority Officials, QueenslandSponsors, Contractor Organization2CONTROLLABLE CATEGORIESControllable CategoryItemApplicable PMBOK Knowledge Area(s)1.Deliverables1.1Ordering, Delivery and Erection of Kerb furnitureMain Group: Scope ManagementSub Group: Verify scope1.2Accomplishment of Underground work with proper quality as per contract termsMain Group: Quality ManagementSub Group: Control Quality1.3Erection of all the items required to maintain top class health safety at construction siteMain Group: Scope ManagementSub Group: define scope1.4Baseline time schedule need to be submitted to Tejas Mehta, Project ManagerMain Group: Time ManagementSub Group: develop schedule1.5Proper establishment of site office need to be executedMain Group: Integration ManagementSub Group: direct and manage project work2.Configuration2.1Tejas Mehta has revised the concrete quality Main Group: Quality ManagementENTERYOURNAMEWITHSTUDENT IDPAGE1
PROJECT CONTROLS REPORTKERB CONSTRUCTION PROJECTAT FISON AVE WESTstandard to cover the scope of extra vehicle loadenvisaged laterSub Group: Quality Control2.2Night work at the junction point is very difficult due to rushing vehicle, so extra precaution need to be provided Main Group: Integration ManagementSub Group: Integrated Change Control2.3For further safety reroutingof the existing service roadis proposed.Main Group: Integration ManagementSub Group: Integrated Change Control3.Status accounts3.1Mobilisation of resources and its demobilisation statusMain Group: Procurement ManagementSub Group: Administer Procurement3.2Cost status (Washington State Department of Transportation, 2008)Main Group: Cost ManagementSub Group: Control Cost3.3Time or schedule statusMain Group: Time ManagementSub Group: Control Schedule3.4Quality status (audits)Main Group: Quality ManagementSub Group: Quality Assurance and Control4.Logs (Fischer Consulting andManagement, 2017)4.1Weather information need to be recordedMain Group: integration ManagementSub Group: Direct and Manage Execution4.2Site verification visit through drone, for taking photographs from any desired place because of heavy vehicular movement.Main Group: integration ManagementSub Group: Direct and Manage Execution4.3Contractor’s claim need to be cross verified, so site visit is requiredMain Group: integration ManagementSub Group: Direct and Manage Execution5.Issues5.1All relevant u/g facilities are already taken out or rerouted, but few more also discovered, which needs to be rerouted too.Main Group: Integration ManagementSub Group: Monitor and control work5.2Local market is unable to fulfil the requirement of construction materials, so need to explore outside one which would definitely Main Group: Procurement ManagementSub Group: Conduct and Control ProcurementENTERYOURNAMEWITHSTUDENT IDPAGE2
PROJECT CONTROLS REPORTKERB CONSTRUCTION PROJECTAT FISON AVE WESTinvite additional time and cost5.3Night visibility concern need to be rectified by installing more lights to avoid any quality and safety issueMain Group: Risk ManagementSub Group: Monitor and Control risks3CONFIGURATION PROCEDURAL OUTPUTSConfiguration ItemProcedural OutputsConfigurationControl LevelCoding System UsedBaseline Used in this projectStatus AccountingPeriodicityVerificationand Audit Review Period and Level of Detail1.2Accomplishmentof Underground work with properquality as per contract termsQuality ControlExecutionUsedWeeklyMonthlyAll details2.1Tejas Mehta has revised the concrete quality standard to cover the scope of extra vehicle load envisaged laterQualityTime & CostExecutionUsedWeeklyMonthlyAll details2.2Night work at the junction point is very difficult due to rushing vehicle, so extra precaution needto be providedTime Cost &ScopeExecutionUsedWeeklyBi-weeklyAll details2.3For further safety rerouting of the existing service road is proposed.Time Cost &ScopeSafetyUsedWeeklyBi-weeklyAll details3.2Cost statusCostBudgetUsedWeeklyMonthlyAll details5.1Night visibility concern need tobe rectified by installing more ScopeSafetyUsedWeeklyMonthlyAll detailsENTERYOURNAMEWITHSTUDENT IDPAGE3
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.
Related Documents