2 BSC PM Part 1 1. Project Initiation Document Project Initiation Document or PID is a file that is used for defining the scope of an undertaken project. Effective scope management is integral to manage the overall success criteria of a selected project. 1.1. Project Background QAHE business management faculty has planned to design a new degree course in sustainable business that focuses on the ethical and the environmental issues. For that, the faculty has planned to arrange and execute a field trip for the students of final year. A PID is prepared that documents the budgetary information, timescales and the stakeholders’ involved with this project. 1.2. Budgetary Information The Programme convener has allocated a maximum budget of £2,000 for each student for the field trip. This makes a total budget to be £60,000 for 30 students. The budget includes all the related booking cost, trip cost, payment of project coordinator and the guide. However, apart from the field trip, there are certain additional costs, which include the payment of project manager and other project resources. All these costs are to be borne by the University. The resources cost considered are indicated in the picture below-
3 BSC PM Figure 1: Illustrating the Resource Cost (Generated from MS Project) The estimated total budget of the entire field trip project including project planning and closure are indicated in the figure below-
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
4 BSC PM Figure 2: Demonstrating the total Project Budget The above figure indicate that the phase “field trip” is planned in such a manner that it is possible to complete the same within the allocated budget of £60,000. The cost of that phase is
5 BSC PM £56,980. The cost of project planning and preparation is $9,080 and the cost of project closure is £2,200. This makes the total cost of the project £68,260. 1.3. Timescale The field trip is scheduled to be completed in 2 weeks or 14 days. However, the entire project, staring from planning to closure phase, is estimated to take 47 days as lot of preparations are to be done prior to the students being send to the field trip. The Gantt chart below represents the time needed for execution of the entire project- Figure 3: Demonstrating the Timescale for the entire Project
6 BSC PM The above picture indicates that the estimated time required for project completion is 47 days. The actual trip will take 14 days for completion. The above figure further indicates the key milestone of the project. 1.4. Objectives The key objectives of the trip to Uganda project are indicated as follows- To schedule a trip of 2 weeks in March To plan the project in such a way that the total cost of trip does not exceed £60,000 To ensure that the students inspect some interesting and sustainable projects in Uganda To develop a comprehensive report on the findings of the trip 1.5. Approach A sequential approach is chosen for planning and execution of the field trip project. The entire project will be executed as per the formulated plan. Figure 3, represents the sequence in which each of the tasks would be executed in an undertaken project. 1.6. Key Staffs The key staffs linked with the “Trip to Uganda Project” are listed below- 1. QAHE Business management faculty 2. Students 3. Project Coordinator
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
7 BSC PM 4. Project Guide 5. Programme Convenor 6. Project Manager The above mentioned human resources are the key staffs linked with the project and are the primary stakeholders of the project. 1.7. Stakeholder Analysis Stakeholder Analysis can be detailed as a process of identifying the human resources in a project who are influenced by the outcome of the project and the extent to which they are affected by the project execution. The stakeholder register below analyses influence and power of each of the stakeholders of the project. StakeholdersPower/InfluenceInterest 1.QAHEBusiness management faculty HighHigh 2. StudentsLowMedium 3. Project CoordinatorMediumMedium 4. Project GuideHighMedium 5. Programme ConvenorHighHigh 6. Project ManagerLowMedium 7.ProjectOwnersofthe selected sites in Uganda HighMedium
8 BSC PM Table 1: Showing the stakeholders’ Analysis The power/interest matrix below represents the stakeholders who are needed to be managed closely, kept satisfied, kept informed and monitored. Figure 4: Illustrating the Power/Interest grid of the Stakeholders 2. Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) The WBS for the trip to Uganda project is indicated in the figure below-
9 BSC PM
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
10 BSC PM Figure 5: Illustrating the WBS of the selected Project The above figure represents the phases, the tasks in each phases, the dependencies and the milestone. 2.1. WBS in managing Tasks WBS helps in management of the tasks by reducing the complexities of the key project activities (Zecheru and Olaru 2016). WBS helps in breaking down a particular tasks into smaller and manageable section thus allowing the manager in planning an undertaken project in a more accurate manner. 2.2. Importance of Critical path analysis Critical path analysis helps in identification and easier management of the most important tasks in a project, which in turn helps in easier identification of the dependencies (Heagney 2016). It is important to identify the shortest time/duration required to complete a particular project.
11 BSC PM Bibliography Carvalho, M.M.D. and Rabechini Junior, R., 2015. Impact of risk management on project performance: the importance of soft skills.International Journal of Production Research,53(2), pp.321-340. Crawford, J.K., 2014.Project management maturity model. Auerbach Publications. Flouris, T.G. and Lock, D., 2016. Compiling the Work Breakdown Structure. InAviation Project Management(pp. 111-126). Routledge. Harrison, F. andLock,D., 2017.Advancedprojectmanagement:astructuredapproach. Routledge. Heagney, J., 2016.Fundamentals of project management. Amacom. Lock, D., 2017.The essentials of project management. Routledge. Rowe, S.R., 2015.Project management for small projects. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Zecheru,V.andOlaru,B.G.,2016.WorkBreakdownStructure(WBS)inProject Management.ReviewofInternationalComparativeManagement/RevistadeManagement Comparat International,17(1).
12 BSC PM Appendices Appendix 1 (WBS)
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser