Samsung's Reputation Management Strategies

This assignment analyzes Samsung's response to the public safety crisis surrounding its Galaxy Note 7 devices. It examines how the company utilized online platforms like social media to communicate transparently with consumers, explain the cause of the explosions, and outline steps taken to rectify the situation. The analysis highlights Samsung's proactive communication strategy as a key factor in mitigating reputational damage and rebuilding trust with its customers.

Running Head: Management Communication
Samsung Electronics
Management Communication

Management Communication P a g e | 1
Samsung group is a South Korean MNC which is headquartered in Seoul; it earned revenue of 174
Billion USD in the year 2016 and is headed by Kwon Oh-hyun. The company is mostly known for its
high technology enabled consumer electronics and appliances (Kovach, 2017). The company was
pivotal in establishing the operating system android in the market and it also gave major android
companies a run for its money. There was a time, in the recent past when Apple feared Samsung and
changed its marketing, production and advertising strategy to build up a strong game against
Samsung. It can be clearly said that Samsung was the first of the few players to take the smartphone
market by a storm (Thandu, Bharti, Malott & Chellapan, 2015)
Galaxy note 7 was a device in a product category of its own; it had many firsts like Gorilla Glass 5 on
the front and the back, a water resistant S-pen and HDR video. Samsung launched its Galaxy Note 7
with much of a fan fare among its Target audience. People across the globe were anticipating the
product very much, thanks to the brilliant marketing and advertising activities deployed by the
brand. Galaxy Note 7 was on the mind of every tech geeks, phone enthusiasts and the population.
People wanted to grab their hands on the phone as soon as possible. Early reviews from Technology
experts gave the phone thumbs up and people started standing in queues and ordering online and
wanted to have the experience provided by the Galaxy Note 7(Tuttle, 2016).The company was sure
of the success of its Galaxy Note 7 series and anticipating the fanfare it announced S8 in the year
2017. It was a very bold move, but Samsung was confident about its product and was sure that no
competitor can beat or match the competition. The Galaxy note 7 was received well amongst the
reviewers of the device, Weird, The Verge, Time and many more sang the device’s praises, and it

Management Communication P a g e | 2
even earned the prestigious Mashable Choice Award. Everything was going extremely well for
Samsung, until, the phone started catching fire while plugged into charging. This was the very
moment which untied the company officials, product, marketing team and all the relevant
departments to come forward and undo the damage it has already caused to its reputation and
legacy(Lan, qiu,He, H & Xu, 2017). The first explosion of the battery occurred on August 24, when a
Galaxy Note 7 device exploded while connected to a charging cable, henceforth more such incidents
came into light. The company later owed that there were errors in both the designing and
manufacturing of the affected batteries by two different manufacturers. Its lithium ion battery which
was jacked into a tight smartphone was unable to handle the heat, which caused the explosion, the
company accepted in one of the report published last year. (Saini & Austin, 2017)
Receiving the early news of explosion, Samsung delayed the shipment of the Note 7 to have quality
control testing, by September it issued a worldwide call of the phone affecting the company in losses
to the tune of billions and a tarnished image. Samsung Galaxy Note 7 can be considered as a worst
dream for the company, there were banners on the Airport that people cannot fly with Note 7 in
their pockets, and hence it was like the worst nightmare for the firm (Hartley, 2017)
The company in the month of September did a worldwide recall of its Note 7 in order to have any
further damage to the lives of people, by October 11 the company stopped the production of Note
7, hence the phone which was one of the most anticipated phones in the history of Smartphones
was removed from the market in a duration of 2 months(Simley, 2017) Samsung wanted to give a
message out in the world about the fiasco and wanted to take a full responsibility for the explosion
in the phone. The company wanted to communicate three distinct type of messages; Primary,

Management Communication P a g e | 3
secondary and tertiary. Primary message was communicated by company intentionally accepting
that it was a design and a manufacturing fault that leads to such a troubled state, hence the primary
message was clear. The company communicated the secondary message by recalling the Note 7 and
stopping the operations in just a span of two months, sending out a strong message that company
will not cause any probable harm in the future. Auxiliary message was communicated by Samsung in
the form that it gave the buyers a provision to exchange the Galaxy note 7 to either S7 edge or
updated Note 7. Hence, the company used Primary, secondary and Auxiliary messages to convey its
intention and not to shy away from what have happened. The company was clear in the delivery and
the intention of its message, it wanted users to know across the globe that it cares about people’s
safety, and it is their priority to take care of its customers. Many statements came out in the process
regarding the worldwide call off of the product, asking the carrier and partners to stop sales and
exchanges of the Galaxy note 7, taking customer’s safety as the first priority, and statements like
that resonated well with the users(Boyce, 2018) They appreciated the efforts of the company in
doing whatever it could to control the damage caused by the explosion, they perceived it as an
honest mistake which can happen to any company and thus the intent of the communication by
Samsung was fairly successful.
Words have two types of meaning, denotative and connotative, attention to both is necessary to
reduce the possibility of misinterpretation. The denotative meaning is the common meaning, often
found in the dictionary, while the connotative meaning is often not found in the dictionary but in the
community of the user itself. Samsung played with the words to manage the Galaxy note 7 fiasco in
both denotative and connotative meanings. If statistics are to be believed, there were more than 92

Management Communication P a g e | 4
reports of batteries overheating in the phone alone in the US, out of which 26 reports were of burn
and 55 reports of property damage, reports surfaced wherein an SUV burst into flames(Maier,
2017). The stocks of the company stumbled by 10% in the entire duration, the entire management
was at loggerheads with the tech and the product team, but the company still stood united to
control the damage and pose a strong picture in front of its consumers.
Overall, Samsung recalled 2.5 million of the new notes across 10 markets, including one million in
the US alone. The management and tech team at Samsung came up with a Software update for the
Note 7 which helped the users to distinguish if there smartphone is affected or not, the software
displayed a green battery icon in the phone’s status bar to indicate whether the phone has been
affected. It was certainly a good strategy by management which was both defensive and combative
at the same time. The representatives were vocal about this strategy and the consumers accepted
the move by Samsung (Mboga, 2017) The company urged its users to return the device as soon as
possible; it announced over the air that it would limit the charging of the phone to 60% of its
capacity to reduce incidents of catching fire, another bold communication strategy by Samsung.
Samsung’s communication strategy post the explosion have been very open and it acknowledged
and accepted its mistake, it did not run away from the incidents and took full responsibility of it,
certainly a sing of a customer centric company.
The staff at Samsung had sleepless nights, they cancelled their holidays, heated boardroom meeting,
frequent brainstorming session and a constant social media monitoring were some of the high lights
at its Seoul office. Samsung after halting the production of the phones asked the users to shut down
their devices permanently, it also shipped the users fireproof boxes with the instructions on how to
pack the device and send it back to the company. All this communication was made public through
all the channels possible, Social media, TV, Radio ads, Print, Samsung websites and so on, in short an
entire plethora of communication channels were used to put out the communication in the market
and do the best to control any further damage. One of the flaws in Samsung’s communication
strategy was that it was not the same for all the countries. For example, India was a huge market for
Samsung, there were thousands of Pre orders which the company failed to ship, and Indians were
simply told that there shipment is delayed, and nothing else. Some of the customers got a
complementary VR headset to compensate for the delayed time. However, Samsung loyalists still
believed that it was just one-off incident and not a big deal; this went strongly in favour of Samsung.
Samsung’s Note 7 Fiasco basically exposed the dangers and the limitation of the lithium ion batteries
in Smartphones, it certainly was a lesson learnt for other smartphone manufacturers, as the
explosion could have happen with any other phone as well. Even after facing such troubled times,

Management Communication P a g e | 5
where the company losses were in thousands of million, it did not cut any jobs, retained all of its
employees and supported them throughout. In the month of December, Samsung completed its
detailed investigation about the explosion and made the report public and sent out to the
regulators. Another example of company being transparent in its business findings, it wanted to gain
the trust of its users and hence made all the records public. Despite all the efforts company did,
certain corporate crisis managers still believe that the company could have handled the situation in a
much better way. They believed that Samsung kept allowing information coming to it piece by piece
which did hurt it more than it should have. A spokesperson pointed to the way Samsung
communicated with the public during the early days of explosion, it was unable to explain the cause
of explosion which was mocked in several daily in the US and other states. It was also felt that
Samsung initially suspected it was the design flaws which lead to explosion but later on further
investigation it realized it was battery problems. Hence, the company was a laughing stock at several
tech meets due to its changing communication to the users.
The world with a throbbing population of 7 Billion, internet penetration of more than 3.75 billion has
connected the world seamlessly. People are connected regardless of border, language, caste, creed
and all the information of the world is available online for public use. Hence, keeping a clean
reputation becomes really important in such a fast pace world, where the information can be
consumed with just a click of a button. Online reputation management is therefore the key word
which is trending in the social circles and companies are taking good care of its online image.
Samsung, whose business mostly depends on learning the consumers behaviour and creating
products based on their demands, it becomes extremely essential to take care of its target audience.
The company not only maintained its image in the press releases or in TV commercials, it took it to
whole another level on Social media platforms. It curated content in-house explaining to the users
about the causes of explosion, ensured that people knew what the company is doing to redo what
has already happened and in the due process built a strong connection with them. Samsung realized
that communication is the key to success and any fiasco can be overturned if the company is
proactive, not concealing anything from its users, posing a strong face in front of the users and
drawing in contingency plans in case any of its future phone encounter such problems. Samsung’s S9
is in for a release and the company realizes that all the eyes are on the phone; hence company is
coming up with another interactive communication strategy and also doing multiple testing of all the
hardware and software in the new phone. Samsung has shown support towards its users, by being
open and transparent in the communication, its time that its users extend the support to Samsung
and make up for all the losses the company underwent.

Management Communication P a g e | 6
References
Boyce, S., 2018. The Science Behind Lithium Cell Characteristics and Safety. Science.
Hartley, S. (2017). The case of the exploding Samsung phones. Busidate, 25(1), 9.
Kovach, S. (2017). Samsung announces what caused the Galaxy Note 7 to overheat and explode.
[online] Business Insider.
Lan, W., Qiu, S., He, H., & Xu, W. (2017). A continuously growing dataset of sentential
paraphrases. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.00391.
Maier, M. S. (2017). Corporate diversification strategies and their effects on firm performance-the
case of Samsung's venture into healthcare (Master's thesis, BI Norwegian Business School).
Mboga, J. (2017). ELICITING MILLENNIAL PERSPECTIVES ON ETHICS IN SAFETY PRODUCT RECALLS TO
ENSURE CONSUMER PROTECTION AND INDUSTRY SUSTAINABILITY. European Journal of
Economic and Financial Research.
Saini, A., & Austin, M. (2017). Manufacturing Li-ion batteries for safety and performance. MRS
Bulletin, 42(6), 414-415.
Simley, J. L. (2017). Teaching Software Testing Concepts Using Learning Objects.
Simley, J. L. (2017). Teaching Software Testing Concepts Using Learning Objects.
Thandu, S. C., Bharti, P., Malott, L., & Chellappan, S. (2015, June). On the feasibility of leveraging
smartphone accelerometers to detect explosion events. In Mobile Data Management
(MDM), 2015 16th IEEE International Conference on (Vol. 1, pp. 191-196). IEEE.
Tuttle, H. (2016). Samsung's vertical integration challenge. Risk Management, 63(10), 6.