Management & leadership of a restaurant chain

LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT INTRODUCTION 3 MAIN BODY3 LO13 P1 Different classic administration hypothesis 3 P2 The function of leaders and various types of leadership styles 3 P3 Management and leadership styles in organization4 LO24 P4 Interior and outside component effecting the administration styles of the organisation 4 LO3 & LO46 CONCLUSION 6 REFERENCES 7 INTRODUCTION Below report will be identifying the management & leadership ofa restaurant chain named as Hazev, Haz and Tas. MAIN BODY LO1 1

LEADERSHIP AND
MANAGEMENT

Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3
MAIN BODY...................................................................................................................................3
LO1..................................................................................................................................................3
P1 Different classic administration hypothesis......................................................................3
P2 The function of leaders and various types of leadership styles.......................................3
P3 Management and leadership styles in organization...........................................................4
LO2..................................................................................................................................................4
P4 Interior and outside component effecting the administration styles of the organisation. 4
LO3 & LO4......................................................................................................................................6
CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................6
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................7

INTRODUCTION
Below report will be identifying the management & leadership of a restaurant chain named as
Hazev, Haz and Tas. An organization is basically a restaurant located in Turkey, including 12
subdivision located in British capital. These branches consist 3 cafes, seven eating house and
two bars. The study is going to classify administration and leading style utilized by manager or
leader in an enterprise. (Burns, 2016).
MAIN BODY
LO1
P1 Different classic administration hypothesis
The organizational structure of Hazev, Haz and Tas consists a finance manager,
managing director, warehouse manager & every restaurant have a particular restaurant and bar
manager.
The administrative hypothesis that is utilized in the company is Henri Fayol
administration hypothesis. Henri Fayol is popular as the male parent of administration as well as
has laid down fourteen principle for administration. This theory of management is used within
the organizational structure includes work division, equity, discipline, remuneration etc. All
these management principles assists leaders in ensuring improved administration of business
operations in a firm.
It is the administration which is successfully accomplished through the assistance of
advance technology. The method and software utilized by the business entity helps the business
in keeping a record of its worker performance and understand at what places value can be gained
and increased in order to achieve success and growth (Kirchmer, 2017). The computers used
allow the organisation to feed the employee data and evaluate their potential.
Along with it, the organizational structure of the organisation is top to bottom but it also
goes from bottom to top.
P2 The function of leaders and various types of leadership styles
The manager of the organisation is its Managing Director. He tends to make use of
effective leadership style such as Systems leadership in order to direct the organization towards
growth and success. In this leadership style, the managing director of the restaurant chain
purposely develop such situations where masses at all levels are working productively as per
their potentials.

In this style of leadership, the leadership designs its systems as such that each and every
employee is pleased while working in the organization’s working environment and is performing
freely to achieve personal and organizational goals.
In order to do this, the leading of organization makes utilization of effectual analogue
application practices. Such practices allow the organization to track analytics, training and
communication, and providing better directions to the employees with an ease.
The organization manages the flow, complexity level, and work relationship matrix for
achieving desired objectives and maintain better efficiency to ensure a better leadership and
decision making.
P3 Management and leadership styles in organization
The administration of the Hazev, Haz and Tas makes utilization of a combination of
Autocratic, Consensual and Democratic styles of management. The autocratic management style
helps the managers to make their decisions unilaterally.
It helps the restaurant's management to ensure faster decision making and consider only a
single persons preferences, which is often the managing director of the organisation (Zukin,
Lindeman and Hurson, 2017). The consensual style of management allows the management to
present problems to their team members for discussions and input of encourage them to make
required decisions. It results in team member increase and group decision commitment.
The democratic management style used within the organisation helps the managers to
offer the employees with an opportunity to engage in decision making practices. In this style, all
the decisions are majority agreed. Also, the information flow from both uppermost to lowermost
and bottom to upper in this sort of management.
The management styles within the company achieves prosperity through help of advance
technology. The management tends to make use of the digital technology in order to monitor
employee’s performance and to collect precise data. Along with it, it helps the organisation to
make better informed decisions and ensure better sales.
LO2
P4 Interior and outside component effecting the administration styles of the organisation
Inner Component SWOT Analysis:
Strengths The organizations' management style is often influenced by its core strengths

which are workers. Workers of company are adolescent and are encouraged
enough to obtain and maintain development. It assists the administration to
make better strategies to ensure and lead success.
Weaknesses The weaknesses of the organisation is its competition. In London, it is having
a number of restaurants which provides improved amenities to its clients
(Sussan and Acs, 2017).
Threats The threats which affects the management styles consisting new trends &
ranging choices of people in food and beverages.
Opportunities The opportunities which are influences the management style includes new
options to develop the food and provides services to ensure better customer
service. Along with it, availability of technology to make work more easy.
 PESTLE Analysis
Political The changes in the government in UK and the problems like Brexit creates
tough political conditions for the company’s management for decision
making that helps in achieving success & growth.
Economical Economic situations like fluctuations in monetary policies, inflation and more
influence financial as well as operational decisions of the management to
overcome any of the negative impact of these macro factors.
Social Purchasing behavior of the customers frequently changes along with the
trends and changing eating habits of the individuals. It enforces the
restaurants businesses to make changes in their menu items. (Teece and
Linden, 2017).
Technological The various development in technology for example better CRM systems,
new arrivals of technological tools develop such conditions in which
management needs to face challenges to make decisions for ensuring smooth
and better functioning of the firm.
Legal Strict legal implication makes it difficult for the management of the company

to develop conditions in which it can perform its business practices freely.
Environmental The issues of change in climate and global warming makes the company’s
management face troubles in fascinating foreigners to the restaurant.
LO3 & LO4
(Covered in Separate Presentations)
CONCLUSION
Assignment explores management as well as leadership of Hazev, Haz and Tas. It also
identified various methods in which digital technology is influencing the company and method in
through which management of the business deals with the change.

REFERENCES
Books and Journals
Burns, P., 2016. Entrepreneurship and small business. Palgrave Macmillan Limited.
Kirchmer, M., 2017. Business process governance. In High Performance Through Business
Process Management (pp. 81-101). Springer, Cham.
Sussan, F. and Acs, Z. J., 2017. The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Business
Economics. 49(1). pp.55-73.
Teece, D. J. and Linden, G., 2017. Business models, value capture, and the digital
enterprise. Journal of Organization Design. 6(1). p.8.
Zukin, S., Lindeman, S. and Hurson, L., 2017. The omnivore’s neighborhood? Online restaurant
reviews, race, and gentrification. Journal of Consumer Culture. 17(3). pp.459-479.(Zukin,
Lindeman and Hurson, 2017)