Leadership and Organizational Outcomes

The assignment delves into the relationship between leadership styles and organizational outcomes. It encourages students to analyze various leadership theories, such as transformational and transactional leadership, and their impact on factors like employee motivation, productivity, and innovation. The provided references offer a foundation for understanding this complex interplay and guide students in developing a comprehensive analysis.

Organisational
Behaviour

Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3
Analysing influence of culture, politics and power within organisational context.....................3
Evaluating theories of motivation that enable effective achievement of goals in organisational
context.........................................................................................................................................5
Analysing effective team as opposed to ineffective team...........................................................7
Applying concepts and philosophies or organisational behaviour within organisational context
.....................................................................................................................................................9
CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................................10
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................12

INTRODUCTION
Organisational behaviour is basically a study of human behaviour or application of
knowledge that how an individual and group act within workplace. It examines human behaviour
in working environment and determines impact on job structure, performance, communication,
motivation and leadership which an individual in performing their task and duties (Ashenden and
Sasse, 2013). In this report organisation chosen is A David & Co Limited, an American company
of food and beverages situated in United Kingdom. This report is going to analyse how
organisation's culture, politics and power influence individual and team behaviour performance
within an organisation. Evaluating how content and process theories of motivation techniques
enable an organisation in effective achievement of goals in an organisation context. Moreover,
determining concepts and philosophies of organisational behaviour that influenced by both
positive and negative way within workplace.
Analysing influence of culture, politics and power within organisational context
In an organisation, organisational culture is defined as underlying beliefs, assumptions,
values which governs how an individual or group of people interact with each other within
workplace. For instance, each and every organisation need to develop and maintain a unique
culture which usually determines guidelines and boundaries for employees and staff members
within an organisation. Herein, human resource managers of A David & Co Ltd have adopted
Handy model of organisation culture in order to overcome impact of culture within work place
which are determined below:
Culture:
This is refers as a cumulative deposits of knowledge, values, beliefs, religion, spatial
relation, experiences obtain through group of individuals into the course of generations by people
as well as team striving. As culture of the A David Co & Ltd is friendly so employees as well as
other stakeholder behaviour also positive towards the company. They perform well in order to
attain objective of firm. Also create good impressions upon stakeholders.
Power culture: In an organisation the power remains in hands of few people only they
are authorised to take decision (Coxen, Van der Vaart and Stander, 2016). Herein, mangers are
ensuring that power should lies in hand of top management so that effective decision can be
taken which is beneficial for both organisation as well as employees. Moreover, of power is in

decentralised form that an employee may make of it that will adversely affected the goals and
objectives of an organisation. Herein, power culture plays an essential role in an organisation if
power lies with few hands the there is no disabilities among roles and responsibilities. Moreover,
each and every employees need to perform as per the instruction. Therefore, it lead to increase
performance of employees in an attractive manner.
Task culture: Task culture help a manger in forming effective team so that targets can
be achieved as well as problem can be solved in critical situations in an appropriate manner
(Carlos Pinho, Paula Rodrigues and Dibb, 2014). Moreover, managers need to ensure that team
should be developed as per same qualification, skills and knowledge so that they can contribute
their best in accomplishment of task in most innovative way . With such instance task culture a
manger will ultimately able to increase performance of team in an appropriate manner. Thus, it
lead to increase productivity and profitability of performance of both organisation and
employee's respectively.
Person culture: In person culture model employees feel that they are more important
than organisation. Herein, an individual are mostly concerned about themselves rather than
organisation. The mangers should ensure that beach and every employee member are equal
within an organisation so that uniformity prevail within workplace.
Role culture: In an organisation role culture indicates that each employees and staff
members are delegated with roles and responsibilities according to its specialization,
qualification and skills. Herein, mangers are forming team according to requirement so that best
output can be attained and able to work in challenging environment. Thus, this help mangers of
respective organisation to delegate roles and responsibilities as per working performance of
employees.
Therefore, the mangers of A David & Co Ltd should adopt Task Culture in their work
place as it will help an organisation to accomplish their goals and objectives with proper
formation of team. Thus, it will help them to increase their productivity and profitability in
competitive marketplace
Power:
This is the ability to perform something, ability to influence the behaviour of another
people (Laurie Mullins, 2016). Through this A David Co & Ltd workers as well as stakeholders
feel authorised and free to make decisions in respects of accomplishing organisational objectives.

Organisation power: In an organisation power is the ability to influence other or capacity to
affect behaviour of subordinates with control resources within workplace (Gelens and et. al.,
2015). Herein, mangers are using French and Raven's forms of power as to gain influence on
ability in order to grant harmony within workplace.
Legitimate power: This power is known as positional power within an organisation. It is
derived from position an individual hold in an organisation hierarchy. This power is used by
mangers of A David Co & Ltd so that power authorities lies within hand of an individual so that
decision are taken effectively which is beneficial for an organisation . Thus it will create impact
on both organisation and individual performance if proper level of hierarchy is maintained so
that there is no misunderstanding between employees and manger.
Expert power: Expert power is derived from having an expertise and knowledge in a
particular area. This power help a respective organisation to have a highly skilled employees in
performing task and activities in an appropriate manner. Moreover, having problem-solving
skills so that alternative decision can be taken when ever required.
Referent power: In an organisation referent power is built by a good interpersonal
relationship among employees and superior in a workplace. Herein, mangers of A David Co &
Ltd ensure that each and every employee and staff members have good interpersonal relation
among them so that good health workplace can be created.
Coercive power: Coercive power is adopted by a respective organisation so that they can
control behaviour of employees by ensuring that they are abided with certain organisation
policies and norms. This also help mangers to reward or punish their employees if their
performance does not match up with organisation goals and objectives.
Reward power: Reward power arises from ability of an individual to influence
allocation of incentives in an organisation (Coccia and Cadario, 2014). The mangers of
respective organisation should ensure that each and every employee are reward with incentives,
bonus and promotion as per their performance so that it does not influence action of other
employees.
Politics:
It is refers as a process of taking decisions which apply to member of a team. It is
generally considered as unofficial efforts to sell ideas, raise power as well as achieve other
targeted goals. Through this A David Co & Ltd employees and stakeholders behaviour impacted

as this creates conflicts among each others as well as reduced the firms and workers
effectiveness.
Organisational Politics
In today's context each and every organisation faces with internal and external politics
that arises within work place (Wehn and Montalvo, 2018). Moreover, in an organisation politic
play's an essential it do have both positive and negative aspect. In an organisation, politics refer
to inform, unofficial and sometimes behind the scenes efforts to sell ideas, influence an
organisation, increase power or attain other targeted objectives.
Positive impact: In an organisation politics have positive impact within workplace. This
will lead to reduce conflicts among employees, motivating employees to work harder to achieve
a desirable position they want to have.
Negative impact: Additionally, politics with in work place do have negative impact
within an organisation. Such as employees may be destructed from each other promotion and
incentives for their performance at same level. Moreover, it may result into divisiveness,
demotivated as well as decrease in productivity and profitability of a respective organisation.
From above discussion it has been determined that organisational culture, power and
politics plays an essential that influences behaviour of an individual or group of people within
workplace.
Politicking:
It is the method as well as behaviour into people interactions including power and
authority. This is utilise to assess the capability of operations and balance diverse views of
interested parties. This is also refers as a organisational politics or office politics. Through this A
David Co & Ltd decrease the disputes and encouraged employees to behave friendly with each
other.
Organisational power
It refer to the abilities and competencies to influence other people. It indicates to the
capacity to affect the behaviour of the subordinates with the control of resources (Laurie, 2016).
It is known as exchange relationship which occurs during the time of transactions between an
agent and a target.
Hofstede's theory:

This theory was introduced by Geert Hofstede, it is a structure utilise to know about the
variations in culture across nation as well as distinguish the manner that business is done across
various cultures (Hooi, 2016). The author identified six categories which explain the culture that
mentioned below:
Power distance index: It expresses the level to which less powerful members of
community excepts and evaluate that distribution power takes place not equally.
Collectivism vs. Individualism: It concentrates upon the questions regarding either
individuals has a preference for being left alone in order to seek after itself or want to be alone in
nearly knitted network.
Uncertainty Avoidance Index: This is refers as a dimension which explain the level at
which individuals into society are not at comfort with uncertainty as well as ambiguity
(Ashenden and Sasse, 2013).
Femininity vs Masculinity: Masculinity implies a preferences of society for
accomplishment, positivity, heroism as well as material reward for achieving success. Femininity
presents a preferences for decency, cooperation, life quality and caring about weak.
Short term and long term orientation: long term orientation explain the society
tendency towards searching for merits. Short term positioning concern to those communities
which are strongly inclined towards formation of exact truth.
Restraints vs. Indulgence: It revolves around the level at which societies can exercise
control over its expectations and desires.
Therefore, this theory is applied by A David Co & Ltd so that they can understand the
different culture and way to operate business in various cultures.
Evaluating theories of motivation that enable effective achievement of goals in organisational
context
In organisational context motivations plays an effective role by encouraging employees
top perform their best (Coccia, 2014). It is process of stimulating and encouraging person to
carry out their task which will ultimately increase productivity and profitability of both
organisation and employees receptively. The gaols of an organisation is have an good employee's
power so that their targets can be achieved within stipulated period of time.
Moreover, A David Co & Ltd are evaluating content and process theory of motivation that
enable in effective achievement of goals in an organisational context.

Content theory of motivation: Content theory basically deals with what are the factors that
motivate people to perform their best within organisation. This theory is concerned with
individuals need and wants (Coccia and Cadario, 2014). The mangers are analysing Maslow's
Need Hierarchy in order to motivate their employees and staff member as to achieve targets
within stipulated time period.
Physiological needs: These needs are basic needs that are essential for survival of human
being such air, food and shelter etc. If the mangers of respective organisation need to make sure
that its employee's physiological needs are fulfilled as per their requirement (Coccia, 2014).
Moreover, if such needs are achieved then an individual will be highly motivated and will work
towards to gain goals and objectives accordingly.
Safety needs: In an organisation if employees feel safe and secure in workplace they feel
motive to perform their task in an effective manner. Moreover, mangers are providing job,
financial and health security to its employees and staff member.
Esteem needs: This need is related to recognition of one's achievement within an
organisation. Such as an individual is having a unique identity, power, competency and respect
etc. Moreover, if mangers are able to provide satisfaction of needs to its employees so that they
feel motivated and become more confident in performing their task.
Social needs: In an organisation, if an individual have a comfortable environment such
as love, affection, care and belongingness in their workplace place then they feel comfortable
carrying out their work effectively. Thus, from such instance a good relationship is formed
among employees and superiors.
Self-actualisation needs: These needs are related to development of one's intrinsic
capabilities that can be utilised in real life situation. The mangers of respective organisation
ensure that this theory will include individual growth and opportunities that keep cropping on
continuous basis.
Herzberg- Two factor Theory:
This theory is also known as a motivation hygiene theory. It explains that there are few
factors which cause job satisfaction and motivation as well as another factors which cause
dissatisfaction. As per the author, job satisfiers deal with factors interested in performing job. Dis
satisfiers deals with the factors that describe the context of job (Coxen, Van der Vaart and
Stander, 2016). Factors used by A David Co & Ltd are mentioned below:

Motivators factors: This factors motivates the workers to perform harder. It presence
effects the hard work of employees. They are identified in the actual job themselves. It includes
recognition, duties, growth, achievement, advancement and so on (Harper, Randall and
Rouncefield, 2012). All these utilise to encourage employees so that they can attain
organisational objectives.
Hygiene factors: This factors do not encourage workers to perform well but it cause them
to become unmotivated. This is not present in actual job itself but environs the work. It involves
supervision, condition of work, salary, relation, security, policies of firm, status and so on
(Hashim and Wok, 2014). A David Co & Ltd use this factors for direction, if they do not get
motivated but work well to accomplish the goals of firm.
For example: If A David Co & Ltd have poor hygiene factors then job satisfaction of
workers reduced. In case, its motivation factors maximise the workers job satisfaction.
Process theory of motivation: Process theory of motivation basically deal with how motivation
will occur within an organisation in order to motivate employees and staff members so that target
goals and objectives can be achieved (Vasconcelos and Kimble, 2016,). Herein, managers are
adopting Vroom's expectancy in order to motivate their employees within workplace. Such as
Valency: It refers to value of an individual on a particular outcome or strength of an
individual’s preference for expected rewards of outcome. Such as if employee's gets motivated
by promotion, bonus and incentives that ultimately create value for an individual as well as
motivate work perform more effectively in future. Thus, in this way both organisation and
employees are benefited.
Instrumentality: If an employee feels or desire to have promotion then an individual
perform their best to achieve their goals and objectives respectively. Moreover, employee's of
respective organisation feel that superior performance is the key factor to achieve high growth
path. Thus, employee will be motivated to perform efficiently with a desire to get promoted.
Expectancy: Expectancy is another factor that determines motivations of an individual
with a particular course action that will lead to have a desired outcome. Moreover, mangers of
respective organisation ensure that an employee should have probability to perform their best in
order to have appropriate outcomes.
Thus, the mangers are adopting expectancy theory in order to encourage their employees
and staff members by facilitating them with desired rewards of their working criteria.

Locke's goal-setting theory:
This theory was introduced by Edwin Locke, it is considered as a framework to utilise
when goals are set for the teams (Hyde, Harris and Boaden, 2013). It depends upon the research
which shows the correct goals can enhance motivation as well as productivity. Also, describe
that if set goals are challenging and suitable as well as obtain regular feedback about the
employees progress. With the help of this theory A David & Co Ltd. Set their goals effective by
following some of its principles:
Clarity: The clear, important goals is more attainable than poorly defined one. So, A
David & Co Ltd can set effectual objectives so that it can be achieved by them on time.
Challenge: The goals of the company should be at decent difficulty level so that
employees get encouraged towards objectives.
Commitment: Here, a deliberately efforts are placed into accomplishing the goals of firm.
So, A David & Co Ltd have to share their objectives with employees so that they their
accountability will enhanced in order to meet its goals.
Feedback: Continuous goals can encouraged workers towards it as regular feedbacks are
received. So, A David & Co Ltd. Set goals of team member then organised a weekly check in
order to monitor their performance.
Task complexity: For setting the motivating goal, so it should be complex. As highly
complex goals can be overpowering as well as demotivating. So, if goals are complicated then
manger of A David & Co Ltd advice employees to break down the task into sub targets.
Therefore, if goals of A David & Co Ltd are clear, challenging, explicit committed,
include regular feedback and complicated but not very much complex then this help them to
keep their team encouraged towards accomplishment of organisational objectives.
Motivational techniques:
Enhancing motivation at job can assists to develop performance, rise morale as well as
advanced productivity. Some of the motivational techniques used by A David & Co Ltd in order
to encourage their workers that are mentioned below:
Facilitating incentives: Company can give incentives to all workers so that they feel
motivated. A David & Co Ltd can provide financial incentives such as gift cards cash prize etc.
also non monetary incentives like vacations and so on. With the assistance of this, their workers
get motivated and perform effectively in order to accomplish their objectives.

Achievements and accomplishments: Achievements of the employees can be celebrated
by star performer awards, employee of the month and so on. For this A David & Co Ltd can print
certificates or post names on firm websites. Recognise group attainments and people efforts
(Kazemipour and Mohd Amin, 2012). This techniques help them to encourage workers and give
its best to achieve the objectives of organisation.
From the above information it can be monitored that the management of the company can
used Maslow needs hierarchy and VROOM theory to motivate the employees so that they can
completed their work in an effective manner.
Analysing effective team as opposed to ineffective team
In an organisation, a team is created for both long and short term duration of time.
Generally, a team consist of group of members that work together towards achievement of
common goal. Moreover, there are two types of team such as;
Effective team: An effective team consist of group of individuals who are have same
skills, knowledge and talent that is necessary in fulfilling a team's goals and objectives in an
appropriate manner .
Ineffective team: On contrary of effective team, ineffective team is opposite in nature.
Ineffective team refers to group of people who are working in team but lacking behind in
achieving goals and objectives of an organisation.
Effective team would make through the respectful communication, innovation and
creativity, involve in continuous development, resolve problems and disputes of teamwork and
many more. All these help A David & Co Ltd to to feel motivated and accomplish the goals of
company.
Ineffective team can be formed because of knowledge gap, lack of unity, lack of cohesion
and so on. So, A David & Co Ltd leaders have to monitor that all members are knowing each
other, have appropriate knowledge regarding work so that ineffectiveness can be remove from
company (Robbins and et. al., 2013).
Difference between effective and in effective team:
Effective Team Ineffective Team
In effective team goals and objectives are
predefined among team members so that they
In ineffective team, it usually become difficult
to understand what are the task that are need to

can perform accordingly to the requirement of
an organisation.
perform for achieving targets within framed
time period.
Herein, most of the decision are taken by the
consent of all team members of respective
organisation so that an appropriate decision
can be taken to perform their task and
activities.
Moreover, in ineffective team decision are
taken forcefully by a leader. Thus, mangers
need to creates issues in performing actives
which are need to achieve goals and objectives
(Thomson and Van Niekerk, 2012).
In effective team leaders does not dominate
this team member in providing suggestion for
having an appropriate result in performance of
team work. Thus, in this way the mangers of an
respective organisation can have an effective.
Hence, in this type of team a leader does not
allow its team members to come up with
suggestion. Moreover, mangers ensure that
each activity and task need to be perform
according to instructing given so that goals can
be achieved.
The above mention is difference between effective team and ineffective team members
with workplace. Moreover, in order to get better understanding of activities of effective team
mangers are adopting Tuck man's theory in order to have a dynamic team with in organisation.
Tuck man's theory focuses on ways how a team tackles a task from of initial performance of
team through the completion of project in an effective manner .
Forming: In this stage a new team is formed or organised for completion of a particular
project. Herein, mangers of A David & Co Ltd need to ensure that team is formed according to
need and requirement so that goals and objectives can be achieved within stipulated period of
time.
Storming: In this stage an individual sees themselves as team members. Herein, mangers
of respective organisation ensure that there is a better understanding among team members so
that they are able to assist each other and provide suggestion for completing project in an
effective way (Harper, Randall and Rouncefield, 2012).
Norming: In this stage, team members become more efficient towards their performance.
Herein, they are no longer focused on individual goals rather that focused on developing a way

of togetherness. Moreover, each and every team member are involved in decision making
process and problem solving skills so that an effective result can be outputted. Thus, leader
should always ensure that team members are working collaboratively as to achieve targeted goals
within estimated time frame.
Performing: This stage focuses on achieving goals within a group. The team members
work with group effectively and continue to monitor progress so that productivity of team can be
maintained. Moreover, a team function excellently and capable of making decision
independently without having confer with team leader (Wang and Ritchie, 2012).
Adjourning: Adjourning is the last stage of team formation. In this stage team members
are moving into different directions after completion of project (Weng and et. al., 2015). Herein,
mangers of A David Co & Ltd. ensure that team form was perspective in nature as well as well
being in completion of project within stipulated period of time.
Thus, Tuck man's theory help human resource managers of A David Co & Ltd in
developing an effective so their projects and targets can be achieved in an effective manner.
Moreover, this will help them to maintain their productivity and profitability in competitive
marketplace.
Belbin's theory:
It is the theory which was introduce by Meredith Belbin in year 1981. This is considered
as a most approachable as well as widely applied tool to support team building. Here, the roles of
the team are created to predict and explain the potential management team success, also
recognise that effective team has a variety of personality and characters kinds. Author explain
that a roles of team as a tendency to behave, contribute as well as associate with another in
specific manner. A David Co & Ltd. Used this theory that help to develop effective team and
understand their roles that are mentioned below:
Implementer: This is generally considered as a practical organiser in team. They are
disciplined systematically as well as task oriented. It has to puts thoughts and plans in simple
implementable task. Also, it can be too functional as well as conservative when new ideas
usefulness is not clear. So, A David & Co Ltd team can be effective organiser and clear
instructor so that work can be done on time (De Vasconcelos, Gouveia and Kimble, 2016).
Resource Investigator: It is cheerful, extroverted individuals with many contacts inside
or outside the team. They are usually adventurous, open minded, enthusiastic and always

searching for innovative ideas. It is good at forming as well as maintaining contacts but careless
at the time of novelty wears off. Therefore, A David & Co Ltd team have this type of members
so that creative ideas can be developed in order to meet the targets successfully.
Plant: These are mostly innovative thinker of group. A free spirit who required space to
fantasize regarding surprising and new solutions for difficult issues. They are not always
practical and many times missed out other requirements from them (Wong, Wong and Ngo,
2012). In A David & Co Ltd, this helpful to resolve issues so that task can be accomplish
effectively.
Monitor: It is critical, sensible, thoughtful. This role is the team analyst and always
examine situations and wants to get deeply into things. With the help of this A David & Co Ltd
can make impartial judgements so that members do not feel inequality.
Shaper: It is generally passionate, driven and wilful as well as also have strong urge to
perform, seeks for challenges and gets things going (Wood and et. al., 2012). Shaper ensures that
deadlines are made and objectives are accomplished. This help A David & Co Ltd to facilitates
essential drive to assure that team keep moving and do not lose concentration from the work and
also perform effectively.
Coordinator: These are the natural team coordinator. It looks after process, assists group
members to clear intentions and state all wants. It has nose for talent as well as knowledge to
used potential of individuals. Coordinator generally trusts others and delegates easily but
sometimes have tendency to leave task upon others. This assists A David & Co Ltd to
concentrate on the goals of the team and delegate task properly.
Completer Finisher: These have talent to know about if anything are going not correct. It
leads towards more attention to details, rechecking, tendency to perfectionism. It monitors the
safety as well as quality but many times become overprotective and identify it challenging to lie
upon others. A David & Co Ltd can use it effectually at task ending so that works errors can be
polish and scrutinise.
Team worker: these are refers as a most sensitive members of the group, useful,
accommodating as well as concentrated towards developing a pleasant atmosphere. It prefer as
balance and harmony and close to others. It have complexity with disputes and may has trouble
in making decisions at complex times (Coccia, 2014). This assists A David & Co Ltd team to
perform as they re versatile to find out the needed task and accomplish it on behalf of group.

Specialist: This is not measurable knowledge sources into their field. Advisor who is
gladly refers and will facilitate knowledge about particular topic with feeling and quality. Its
contribution to group are their substantial understanding and technical skills (Carlos Pinho,
Paula Rodrigues and Dibb, 2014). It aids A David & Co Ltd to get deep understanding about
team key area.
Applying concepts and philosophies or organisational behaviour within organisational context
In an organisation, organisational behaviour basically investigates its effect or impact of
workplace in performance of individual and groups. Herein, mangers of A David Co & Ltd are
having a good employee as well as organisational development. The objective of organisation
behaviour includes providing positive working culture to employees as a positive environment
increases employee retention and satisfaction. Furthermore, the mangers are adopting path goals
theory within organisational context.
Path Goal Theory:
Path goal theory is a usually based on specifying a leadership style or behaviour that best
fits the employee and work environment in order to achieve goals. This goals increase
employee’s motivation, empowerment and satisfaction so that employees become productive
within an organisation (Hashim, 2014). Herein, mangers of A David Co & Ltd are having
multiple leadership in performing their task and day to day activities. It encourages employees to
be motivated and bring efficiency in accomplishment of set goals and objectives. Some steps are
involved in this theory that are mentioned below:
 Value the characteristics of workers
 Choose suitable style of leadership
 Focus on the factors of motivation which will aids employees to complete the goals. It
will lead towards growth and success of firm.
Some characteristics are focussed through path goal theory in following way:
Employees characteristics: Employees are find out as per the experiences controlled by them
and their capacity in order to handle its responsibilities. Work are given according to employees
skills and ability. So, it is crucial for A David & Co Ltd to motivate their employees as well as
groups (Coccia and Cadario, 2014).
Task and environmental characteristics: Task characteristics rise in organisation are of 3 types
such as team work, design and authority formal system. This is important to understand that

which kinds of task are to be allotted to workers. A David & Co Ltd manager have give support
to accomplish the goals of firm.
Furthermore, this theory exhibits the different styles that helps leaders to face issues with
regards to leadership, procured in different situations:
Directive Leadership: In this type of leadership focuses on communicating the main
motive of leader and schedule the day to day actives. Moreover, according goals and targets can
be achievable with an estimated time period of time (Xerri and Brunetto, 2013). This style of
leadership aids A David & Co Ltd to communicate clear goals of company and direct employees
to do perform task on time.
Supportive Leadership: In supportive style of leadership, a leader deals with
subordinates with friendly and supportive nature so that team members feel comfortable in
discussing their ideas and views (Ashenden and Sasse, 2013). Moreover, this type of leadership
is useful if a team member of A David & Co Ltd has a personal issue, not able to believe in
himself or is consequently results in to demotivated.
Achievement-oriented leadership: This approach helps a leader to sets out challenging
targets in order to increase the capabilities of team members or to assess the existing capabilities.
Moreover, this approach motivates members to achieve the sated challenging goals or target and
assist them in order to increase capabilities. Thus, this is beneficial for both A David & Co Ltd
and their employees to gain its objectives and goals in an effective manner respectively.
Participative Leadership: In participative style of leadership are trying to engaged in
participation of team members so that a productive can be developed. It also enables employees
and staff member to share their ideas and views with new innovation in it. Thus, it one of the
most and effective way to develop organisational behaviour within an organisation. This style
assist A David & Co Ltd leaders to involve their employees into work and attain goals
successfully.
Different Situations of organisational context
Poor communication: In organisations context communication plays and effective role.
Herein, if leaders fail to explain goals and objectives to its employees than an organisation will
not be able to accomplish their aims in an effective manner (Ashenden and Sasse, 2013).
Multitasking: In an organisation it essential for leaders to perform multitasking. If
leader fails to do so than the performance of employee will not able concentrate on a particular

job or task given. For such instance a proper training and development should be provide to
employees so that task can be performed in an appropriate manner.
From the above mention it has been clear that A David & Co. Ltd are adopting different
types of leadership in order to motivate their employees and staff members (Coccia and Cadario,
2014). Moreover, organisational behaviour concepts and theories are applied by management so
that it is beneficial for leaders and team members to coordinate with each other and develop
positive work culture within workplace.
Contingency theory:
This theory is developed by Frederick Fielder in the year 1960. It emphasizes the
Significance of personality of leaders and situations at which that leaders operates. Leadership
traits assists in particular crisis and so leadership will required to modify provided sets of
circumstances. An affects of this on leaders who are very effectual at one place as well as time
may become not successful whether when transplanted to other situation (Coccia, 2014). This
assists A David & Co Ltd leaders to represent work clearly and with objectives. So, that
problems regarding situations can be resolved easily. It help leaders of A David & Co Ltd to
make effective decisions, lead organisation towards accomplishment of objectives.
These all theories and models are beneficial for improving the performance and
productivity of the company because if the company use motivational theories then it can
encourage its employees to complete their work in an effective manner by using their all efforts
and effectiveness. With the help of using effective leadership styles the leaders of the company
can also provide proper guidance to the workers so that they can clearly understand and have
information about the vision, mission and objective of the task.
CONCLUSION
From the above discussion it has been concluded that organisational behaviour is
essential within an organisation as it help how an individual and group act within workplace. It is
important for an organisation to have a unique culture within workplace so that employees feel
comfortable in performing their task. Moreover, the managers have adopted content and process
theory so that employees feel motivated, safe and secure in workplace and carry out their work
effectively and achieve their goals and objectives within stipulated time period. Additionally, by
making a dynamic team an organisation is able to carry out their projects with best result with

proper strategies of problem-solving skills. Thus, organisational behavioural plays a pivotal role
within an organisation.

REFERENCES
Books and Journals
Ashenden, D. and Sasse, A., 2013. CISOs and organisational culture: Their own worst enemy?.
Computers & Security. 39. pp.396-405.
Carlos Pinho, J., Paula Rodrigues, A. and Dibb, S., 2014. The role of corporate culture, market
orientation and organisational commitment in organisational performance: the case of
non-profit organisations. Journal of Management Development. 33(4). pp.374-398.
Coccia, M. and Cadario, E., 2014. Organisational (un) learning of public research labs in
turbulent context. Int. J. Innovation and Learning. 15(2). pp.115-129.
Coccia, M., 2014. Structure and organisational behaviour of public research institutions under
unstable growth of human resources. International Journal of Services Technology and
Management. 20(4-6). pp.251-266.
De Vasconcelos, J. B., Gouveia, F. R. and Kimble, C., 2016, July. An organisational memory
information system using ontologies. In Atas da Conferência da Associação Portuguesa
de Sistemas de Informação (Vol. 3, No. 3).
Harper, R., Randall, D. and Rouncefield, M., 2012. Organisational change and retail finance:
An ethnographic perspective. Routledge.
Hashim, J. and Wok, S., 2014. Predictors to employees with disabilities’ organisational
behaviour and involvement in employment. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An
International Journal. 33(2). pp.193-209.
Hyde, P., Harris, C. and Boaden, R., 2013. Pro-social organisational behaviour of health care
workers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 24(16). pp.3115-
3130.
Kazemipour, F. and Mohd Amin, S., 2012. The impact of workplace spirituality dimensions on
organisational citizenship behaviour among nurses with the mediating effect of affective
organisational commitment. Journal of Nursing Management. 20(8). pp.1039-1048.
Muchiri, M.K., Cooksey, R. W. and Walumbwa, F.O., 2012. Transformational and social
processes of leadership as predictors of organisational outcomes. Leadership &
Organization Development Journal. 33(7). pp.662-683.
Robbins, S., and et. al., 2013. Organisational behaviour. Pearson Higher Education AU.
Thomson, K. and Van Niekerk, J., 2012. Combating information security apathy by encouraging
prosocial organisational behaviour. Information Management & Computer Security.
20(1). pp.39-46.
Wang, J. and Ritchie, B. W., 2012. Understanding accommodation managers’ crisis planning
intention: An application of the theory of planned behaviour. Tourism Management.
33(5). pp.1057-1067.
Weng, R. H., and et. al., 2015. Exploring the impact of transformational leadership on nurse
innovation behaviour: A cross‐sectional study. Journal of Nursing Management. 23(4).
pp.427-439.
Wong, Y. T., Wong, C. S. and Ngo, H. Y., 2012. The effects of trust in organisation and
perceived organisational support on organisational citizenship behaviour: A test of three
competing models. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 23(2).
pp.278-293.
Wood, J., and et. al., 2012. Organisational behaviour: Core concepts and applications. John
Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Xerri, M. J. and Brunetto, Y., 2013. Fostering innovative behaviour: The importance of
employee commitment and organisational citizenship behaviour. The International
Journal of Human Resource Management. 24(16). pp.3163-3177.
Laurie J.. Mullins, 2016. Management and organisational behaviour. Pearson.
Coxen, L., Van der Vaart, L. and Stander, M. W., 2016. Authentic leadership and organisational
citizenship behaviour in the public health care sector: The role of workplace trust. SA
Journal of Industrial Psychology. 42(1). pp.1-13.
Gelens, J. and et. al., 2015. Affective commitment of employees designated as talent: signalling
perceived organisational support. European Journal of International Management. 9(1).
pp.9-27.
Wehn, U. and Montalvo, C., 2018. Knowledge transfer dynamics and innovation: Behaviour,
interactions and aggregated outcomes. Journal of Cleaner Production. 171. pp.S56-S68.
Hooi, L. W., 2016. Organisational Justice and Citizenship Behaviour in Malaysia. Springer
Singapore.
Online
Tuckman forming storming norming performing model. 2018. [Online]. Available through:
<https://www.businessballs.com/team-management/tuckman-forming-storming-
norming-performing-model/>.