Termination/Closure Plan for Kerbs Construction
Added on 2019-11-12
6 Pages2972 Words427 Views
|
|
|
PROJECT AUDITAND TERMINATION REPORTKERB CONSTRUCTION PROJECTAT FISON AVE WESTPPMP20010 Project Audit and Termination Report 1PROJECT INFORMATIONProject Name: Kerb Construction Project at Fison Ave WestDate: 8th September 2017Project Ownership: Project Controls Department Prepared by:Student’s Name, Project Manager, Contractor FarmDistribution List:Tejas Mehta, Project ManagerHead, TMRSponsor, Contractor FarmProject Site Team Members, Contractor FarmHead Office Project Members, Contractor Farm2AUDITABLE CATEGORIESAuditable CategoryWBS ID and Item DescriptionApplicable metrics1.Performance / Progress(Estates Services, 2017)1.1Change in cost during the project life cycle due to increase in resource shortageYes, the baseline cost had tobe revised onceNo, the cost was never changed from its budget1.2Change in cost performance indexYes, the cost performance index (CPI) got below 1No, CPI never reached below 11.3Change in scope during the project life cycleYes, scope increased for twice instancesNo, scope was same since the planning stage of the project2.Compliance(TechTarget, 2015)2.1The change in cost was due to shortage of resources andeven increase in scope, so was the change control system used for the approvalof change requestYes, the path described in change control management plan was followedNo, the management plan was neglected and not followed at all instances2.2All the statutory complianceswere obtained from the Yes, the request letter or application was approved by ENTERYOURNAMEWITHSTUDENT IDPAGE1
PROJECT AUDITAND TERMINATION REPORTKERB CONSTRUCTION PROJECTAT FISON AVE WESTauthorities for the projectlocal authoritiesNo, the request was not approved at first go3.Quality (Shah, 2011)3.1The Kerb was built as per the defined standard in contractYes, kerbs was built by strictly following the standardsNo, it could not be built, at very few instance there werelapse in quality, however proper rectification was attended3.2Was the CV (Cost Variance) could be maintained positive throughout the project Yes, CV was +ve for the whole life cycleNo, CV could not be maintained +ve throughout3.3Was the SV (Schedule Variance) could be maintained positive throughout the project Yes, SV was +ve for the whole life cycleNo, SV could not be maintained +ve throughout4.Change / Exit(Microsoft, 2017)4.1The purchase of Kerb road furniture was concluded properly by submitting the procurement documents too Yes, all the items as per contract supplied and documentation also completedNo, the items are delivered as per contract, but the documentation was not submitted fully4.2The safety item supply and installation contractor has installed all the items at siteYes, the contractor has installed successfully and all contractual closure documentation submittedThe installation are done but final document submission after quality check is pendingyet5.Risk(Accounting-Simplified, 2013)5.1All the risks are responded according to the response plan developed earlierYes, all the risks responses are applied to the threatsNo, all the risks responses were not applied5.2All the identified opportunities are explored toenhance the occurrence probability and impactYes, all the identified opportunities are enhancedNo, the opportunities were neglected and no effort was made to enhance them6.Best Practices / Lessons to be Learned(Project Smart, 2017)6.1Always the execution planning need to be done with keeping rainy season in mind and work should not beplanned in this time to avoid any delay compared to Yes, the criteria was considered while planning the execution phaseNo, the criteria was not considered for planningENTERYOURNAMEWITHSTUDENT IDPAGE2
PROJECT AUDITAND TERMINATION REPORTKERB CONSTRUCTION PROJECTAT FISON AVE WESTbaseline6.2Procurement of critical items like safety must be started inadvance to avoid last moment rush and do extra expenditureYes, the procurement was done at early stage itself to save time and money bothNo, the procurement was notdone at early stage3AUDIT PLANAudit CategoryItemWhen will it be conducted? Who will conduct?Purpose (discovery or decision-making)?Performance / Progress1.1Cost audit after the approval of change orderProject Manager & SponsorDecision-making1.2Monthly auditProject ManagerDecision-making1.3Audit change request statusProject ManagerDecision-makingCompliance2.1Audit change request statusProject ManagerDecision-making2.2Quarterly auditSenior Executive,Contractor Farm, DiscoveryQuality3.1Quality Audit, as perrequestProject ManagerDiscovery3.2Monthly auditProject ManagerDecision-making3.3Monthly auditProject ManagerDecision-makingChange / Exit4.1Procurement Audit in-between the progress & last one after the task endsSenior executive, Contractor FarmDiscovery4.2Monthly Audit in-between the progress & last one after the task endsSenior executive, Contractor FarmDiscoveryRisk5.1Monthly auditProject ManagerDiscovery5.2Monthly auditProject ManagerDiscoveryBest Practices / Lessons to be Learned6.1Monthly Audit in-between the progress & last one after the task endsProject ManagerDecision-making6.2Monthly Audit in-between the progress & last one after the task endsProject ManagerDecision-makingENTERYOURNAMEWITHSTUDENT IDPAGE3
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.
Related Documents