Team Work - Progress Report, Meetings, Employee Satisfaction Survey, Conflict Management

Running head: TEAM WORK
Team Work
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author Note:

1
TEAM WORK
Answer 1:
Progress report:
Progress Report of .........................................
Designation and department: ..................................................
Reporting manager: ..........................................
Skip level manager: ............................................
Tenure:...........................(months)
For the period: 2018
Criteria One week
score
One month
score
One Quarter
score
Annual
score
Technical skills D1:
D2:
D3:
D4:
D5:
W1:
W2:
W3:
W4:
M1:
M2:
M3:
Q1:
Q2:
Q3:
Q4:
Team work D1:
D2:
D3:
D4:
D5:
W1:
W2:
W3:
W4:
M1:
M2:
M3:
Q1:
Q2:
Q3:
Q4:
Knowledge and skills D1:
D2:
W1:
W2:
M1:
M2:
Q1:
Q2:

2
TEAM WORK
D3:
D4:
D5:
W3:
W4:
M3: Q3:
Q4:
Leadership skills D1:
D2:
D3:
D4:
D5:
W1:
W2:
W3:
W4:
M1:
M2:
M3:
Q1:
Q2:
Q3:
Q4:
Presentation power D1:
D2:
D3:
D4:
D5:
W1:
W2:
W3:
W4:
M1:
M2:
M3:
Q1:
Q2:
Q3:
Q4:
Analytical skills D1:
D2:
D3:
D4:
D5:
W1:
W2:
W3:
W4:
M1:
M2:
M3:
Q1:
Q2:
Q3:
Q4:
Conflict management skills D1:
D2:
D3:
D4:
D5:
W1:
W2:
W3:
W4:
M1:
M2:
M3:
Q1:
Q2:
Q3:
Q4:

3
TEAM WORK
Total score
Grading as per score:
Good/Average/Excellent/Poo
r
Actions to
be taken:
Assessor 1 Assessor 2 Assessor 3
Signature of manager:
Signature of CEO:
HR Department:
Signature of employee: Received and accepted on...........................
Note:
1. The original should be received by the employee and a signed photocopy should
be handed to the HR department.
2. Ratings: 1 to 5 (very poor to excellent)
3. Yellow area to be filled by the employee only
4. Score area to be filled by the assessors.
5. Red area to be filled by departmental head only
Review of the employee:
The employee under question would be reviewed according to the reports of the progress
report and as per decisions taken by the three assessors. The review would consist of detailed
analysis of the performance of the employee, his achievements and weaknesses. The outcome of
the review would be recognising areas where the employee needs to improve and framing of skill
development programme for him (Dall’Ora et al. 2016).