Management and Leadership Styles of Hazev, Haz and Tas

This report discusses the functionality of Hazev, Haz and Tas, different classical management theories, role of leaders and different leadership styles, reviewing the management and leadership styles of Hazev, Haz and Tas chains, and investigation of digital technology.

Running head: Hazev, Haz and Tas
Hazev, Haz and Tas
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author note

1Hazev, Haz and Tas
Table of Contents
Case Scenario.............................................................................................................................2
Different classical management theories...................................................................................2
Role of leaders and different leadership styles..........................................................................3
Reviewing the management and leadership styles of Hazev, Haz and Tas chains....................4
Investigation of digital technology.............................................................................................4
Bibliography...............................................................................................................................5

2Hazev, Haz and Tas
Case Scenario
Hazev, Haz and Tas has been the concern of the entire scenario. The restaurant has 21
food and beverages operations around the globe. Cafes and bars are the major highlights of
these organizations that are based in New Zealand. Introduction of digital technology has
been the major concern for the processing of the entire business organization. Digital
technology is to be implemented in the financial field as well as the marketing field, which
will provide advantages as well as disadvantages. This report will discuss about the
functionality of Hazev, Haz and Tas.
Different classical management theories
The different classical management theories include scientific management theory,
administrative management theory and the bureaucratic theory. The Scientific theory was
industrialised by Fredrick Taylor, in the year 1911 (Hsu, Wiklund and Cotton 2017). This
management theory includes the functioning of temporal factors and the proper investigation.
According to Taylor Fredrick, scientific management theory will act as a solution to all the
problems that are related to business. This management theory will also help in bettering of
the business management of Hazev, Haz and Tas. Administrative management theory was
stated by Fayol in the year 1916 (Remane et al. 2016). This theory deals with six functions
and the fourteen-management principle as per the requirement of the business organization.
The six management functions that are taken into consideration includes predicting, planning,
organizing, commanding, coordinating and monitoring. These steps are performed in a serial
method. This is the foremost cause that the functioning of the development will get
performed as per the completion of the process. This guarantees the fact that the organization
of the development will get achieved as per the results that are estimated by the management
section. In the initial stage the predicting the outcome of the project will is performed. In case
the management of the business organization plans before starting of the project the main
advantage that will be received is having a better understanding of the risks that might affect
the functioning of the project. This guarantees the datum that the functioning of the project
will be performed in manner that will helps in stopping of wasting resources. After planning
of the project organizing of the project will be performed (Hess et al. 2017). This guarantees
the circumstance that the administration of the project will get easy as per the completion of

3Hazev, Haz and Tas
the project. Commanding of the employees of the project will ensure that the project will get
performed in an efficient manner. Developing of proper coordination will increase the
efficiency in the commencement of the project. With the help if proper coordinating among
the employees of the Hazev, Haz and Tas, the outputs that will be gained will be much
higher. Despite having a proper coordination among the employees of Hazev, Haz and Tas,
monitoring the employees in a better manner helps in increase their motivation and hence the
project will get confirmed as per the process enhancement. Bureaucratic theory also ensures
that social and economic aspect of the project is taken into consideration. This guarantees the
circumstance that the organization of the business organization gets functional as according
to this theory the main central that will be received includes better understanding of the
requirements and hence planning of the project. This guarantees the circumstance that the
administration of the project will get achieved in an improved method (Yinqi and Baizhou
2017).
Role of leaders and different leadership styles
The different roles that are included in the process includes inspiring trust among the
employees of the organization. This ensures the fact that the employees of the organization
will be having higher motivation and hence performance of the employees will get better.
Creating of vison is also considered as a main role of the leaders. The leaders are responsible
developing strategies as per the completion of the project. This includes the fact that the
management of the development will get achieved as per the strategies that are set by the
leaders. This is one of the major reason that the functioning of the project will get executed as
per the planning that is performed by the leader in charge (Barrett et al. 2015). Unleashing
the ability of the employees are also the main role of the leaders. In case the potentials of the
employees are not well retrieved the main issue that will be present includes gaining of better
results. Hence Hazev, Haz and Tas will be getting benefitted after the deployment of proper
leadership quality. This is one of the major reasons that leadership has been benefitting the
entire business management process.
Different styles of leadership include Autocratic leadership, democratic leadership
and Strategic leadership. In case of autocratic leadership the process that is followed by the
leaders include centralized leadership. In this case the leader acts as the boss (Hartmann,
King and Narayanan 2015). With the help of this technique the leader has entire control over
the entire business functioning process. In the democratic process the leader involves the

4Hazev, Haz and Tas
employees in decision making of the project. In this case the employees play active role in
progress of the business organization. In case of strategic leadership, the main aspect that will
be taken into consideration includes better commencement of the project as per developing
the strategies for the business organization. In this case the leaders are solely responsible for
taking decisions.
Reviewing the management and leadership styles of Hazev, Haz and Tas
chains
The management and leadership style of the Hazev, Haz and Tas has been highly
efficient. The main reason of high efficiency includes better coordination among the
management team and the leadership team (Bamberger and Lobel 2017). The success of the
projects has been the major proof of good combination structure. Proper monitoring of the
project is also seen. Implementation of classical management theory is used by the managers.
Investigation of digital technology
Implementation of digital technology has affected the external and internal
management section in appositive manner. The main reason of increase in efficiency of the
process is that the functional process gets performed in a manner that affects in popularising
of the project in a better manner. Due to this popularising of the products, marketing of the
products gets easier. Usage of the digital technology in internal management system, helps in
better analysing of the job structure. This ensures the fact that the management of the projects
gets performed in a positive manner. With regards to the fact that the performance of the
employees can be checked, the entire scenario of the project will get benefitted. This section
also includes the fact that the communication process in between the employees of the
organization will also get benefitted from the process. With better communication among the
employees, coordination among them will get established in a proper manner.

5Hazev, Haz and Tas
Bibliography
Bamberger, K.A. and Lobel, O., 2017. Platform Market Power. Berkeley Tech. LJ, 32,
p.1051.
Barrett, M., Davidson, E., Prabhu, J. and Vargo, S.L., 2015. Service innovation in the digital
age: key contributions and future directions. MIS quarterly, 39(1), pp.135-154.
Hartmann, B., King, W.P. and Narayanan, S., 2015. Digital manufacturing: The revolution
will be virtualized. McKinsey Quarterly, Aug.
Hess, T., Matt, C., Benlian, A. and Wiesböck, F., 2016. Options for formulating a digital
transformation strategy. MIS Quarterly Executive, 15(2).
Hsu, D.K., Wiklund, J. and Cotton, R.D., 2017. Success, failure, and entrepreneurial reentry:
An experimental assessment of the veracity of self‐efficacy and prospect
theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), pp.19-47.
Remane, G., Hildebrandt, B., Hanelt, A. and Kolbe, L.M., 2016, June. Discovering New
Digital Business Model Types-a Study of Technology Startups from the Mobility Sector.
In PACIS (p. 289).
Yinqi, L. and Baizhou, L., 2017. Comparative Analysis of Autonomy and Cooperatively of
Enterprises′ Technology Innovation under the Knowledge Networks——Based on Spatial
Panel Durbin Error Model. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, (3), p.12.